CarpForum.co.uk brand mark, a blue stylized fish with a white eye and a smooth modern look, set in the site header against a clean background CarpForum.co.uk wordmark in a bold flowing script style, reading CarpForum.co.uk, displayed in the site header
Menu
Utils
Go Premium Who's Online Members Weather Photo Gallery Articles
Account
Login Register
Live streaming and making video banned on a venue (31 posts / 4,713 views)
g4fne g4fne
Posts: 15,110
Post #1 15 May 2026 13:12
0
A club have posted this on social media (im not a member), and I get that i am of a certain age (older) ....

..... but this to me doesnt feel a particularly contentious or controversial rule/decision, however the outcry would suggest it is a really big deal for many, some even claiming they won't rejoin because of this rule and others claiming its not legally forceable anway (im not sure what difference that makes?)

I dont really understand why people would have such strong feelings about this, but no publicity waters have been a thing for decades, and this isnt even that!.

Screenshot-2026-05-15-13-11-16
THEBIGUN THEBIGUN
Posts: 1,109
Post #2 15 May 2026 13:33
0
In reply to Post #1
My lake is similar. We have had a publicity ban for over 25 years. No pictures to be posted on any social media platforms what so ever. They have recently bought in the no live streaming on tiktok or instagram etc as well. No exceptions.

I've kind of got used to it, so it doesn't really effect me. I don't get how taking a picture of the fish only (with no background of the lake) is a problem really, but rules are rules if you want to fish the lake.
framey framey
Posts: 5,319
Post #3 15 May 2026 14:50
0
Club I am on has the same on one of our rivers
blackfield blackfield
Posts: 2,651
Post #4 15 May 2026 15:29
3
Don't like or can't live with the rules = don't join or move on. Simples.
vossy1 vossy1
MODERATORMOD
Posts: 9,046
Post #5 15 May 2026 15:30
0
In reply to Post #4
+1
inzenity inzenity
Posts: 473
Post #6 15 May 2026 15:44
0
I was watching a yt video this winter, nobody on the lake, apart from two yt anglers, who proceeded to interview each other. OMG. What i am trying to say, pretty sensible rule, i can imagine it's near on impossible to reach a swim on things like linear without getting on video, when there's a vlogger in every second swim. Same btw with nice old streets or cities, you walk there minding your own business, and there comes a vlogger live streaming their city walk being annoyed that you walk there too spoiling their unique take on things. Etc, etc.
silverfish silverfish
Posts: 2,652
Post #7 15 May 2026 16:05
2
In reply to Post #1
good, off with the needy twots
essesxandy essesxandy
Posts: 3,197
Post #8 15 May 2026 18:13
0
In reply to Post #1
This was the BDAC, one of, if not the largest clubs in Essex.
I did wonder if it was to do with safeguarding issues, what with their large number of junior members?
In the last couple of years I've had a couple of potential members ask if it's ok to post stuff on their 'socials'. Lol
maplecream
Posts: 723
Post #9 15 May 2026 20:07
0
In reply to Post #4
Yep totally agree, my local club has similar, never heard any complaints, I'm sure most are in agreement.
Karlos Karlos
MODERATORMOD
Posts: 14,187
Post #10 15 May 2026 21:36
6
My syndicate has been no publicity for years and the other club I am in has turned non-publicity April 2026 (Martin Locke kept the venue name quiet on the Korda podcast when he was talking about THE fish from there). Waiting list on that one is circa 10 to 12 years at the moment according to the newsletter/application form when I rejoined...

I don't tend to post any photos on FB / Insta etc anyhow...I just spam my mates with them (if they are in the syndicate)

I'm all for keeping things a bit private. Do whatever photos/videos you want for your own pleasure...to look back on...but often publicising venues ends with them getting rammed and spoiling it for the locals/regulars.
Karlos Karlos
MODERATORMOD
Posts: 14,187
Post #11 15 May 2026 22:47
3
In reply to Post #10
Weirdly...I just clicked a video and started watching it and a similar question cropped up in the rotary letter. Gaz poses the question, 1m 42s in ...

RKB
Posts: 1,731
Post #12 16 May 2026 08:14
1
I definitely differentiate between sharing of captures vs "creating content."
MJTee
Posts: 53
Post #13 16 May 2026 09:54
0
PAAS have had this type of rule for several years now ....
Baitman Baitman
Posts: 5,233
Post #14 16 May 2026 14:04
1
In reply to Post #13
And often abused
kells kells
Posts: 6,017
Post #15 16 May 2026 19:42
0
Never could get my head around publicity bans. Even back in the day. Let alone now..

I think Carp fishing Media is slowly eating itself anyway. So anything to stop the proliferation of Media content out there is a good thing in my opinion..

But if your filming for your own enjoyment or just sharing with a few mates. Can't see nothing wrong in that
AideyKaye
Posts: 1,010
Post #16 17 May 2026 17:18
2
In reply to Post #1
They've all admitted that their content destroys waters, yet they do it anyway as they have bills to pay and tackle to sell.

Pound notes come first. Especially if you're a twenty something youtuber begging for a freebie.

I hate being so negative about this industry, but they don't help themselves.
scozza
Posts: 18,421
Post #17 17 May 2026 17:48
1
Different game now. Gone are the days of sharing your pictures in the angling times, anglers mail and carp talk etc. Along came the internet, game changer and now vlogs.

Personally if people are making their own little blogs and are not bothering others, crack on for me. If they are annoying others then fair play, ban it.

The problem. As soon are you are fishing a water and somebody puts a film on about it, expect the worst, no different to pictures on face ache etc. The problem is there are a lot of desperate people in this game who don't want to do the work or don't know how to. Expect to struggle for a swim once it's out there. I learned this a long time ago, once bitten 5 times as shy. Never again would I post pictures, if you do expect a circus at the lake the following week and it can ruin the fishing for years

From a syndicate perspective, why not have them exclusive, keeps the idiots away

Imagine if they banned content on all carp lakes, what would all these scoungers do who are trying to scrape a living through sponsorship that is ultimately funded by the working man. The good news is these people won't want to fish these waters because they can't get anything from them, £. Potentially a good idea. The anglers can though, just pleasure, fishing as it should be, why we go ain’t it
Singlebleep Singlebleep
Posts: 2,380
Site deviant...
Site deviant... Post #18 18 May 2026 11:24
4
I suppose I'm old school (not Old Skool) due to the length of time I've been doing this hobby.

I suppose I'm Old school due to my age as I don't do most forms of social media. I don't generally watch much fishing content, the odd YouTube vid normally for some tech info ( setting ATT remote etc), I don't watch fishing programmes unless accidentally finding one when flicking through tv channels, but did watch 'The Great Rod Race' with Matt Haynes some years ago. I still have some DVD's and even a video from years back, usually Christmas stocking fillers gathering dust somewhere.

So in short the modern trend of blogs, vlogs et etc just pass me by. Not only am I unaffected ( as in watching it) by it but I actively dislike it. I don't dislike the perpetrators individually as I don't know them but because of what they turn my hobby into, so I would happily support a ban on them. I also have no problem with waters that have a publicity bans. It makes sense to keep things in-house for the good of the membership. I suppose being ex forces mean I'm more of a rule taker than breaker and that's been inbred in me. Go back to the 70's when it was possible to stumble onto an unknown patch of water with exceptional fishing. Would you quietly fish it or write to the Angling press with pictures shouting about your little bit of paradise? Like hell you would. You'd fish it quietly dreading the day when others found it and eventually but surely it leaked out in drips and drabs. Even in the 90’s when Carp Talk arrived there were plenty of pics being sent in from ‘unknown’ waters.

tomsher01 tomsher01
Posts: 998
Post #19 24 May 2026 01:23
3
In reply to Post #1
The reason certain people have strong feelings about this is , is fairly straight forward ... we are actively breeding and have bred a generation of instant gratification gammon bred attention seeking morons.. end of..
James_9
Posts: 502
Post #20 24 May 2026 06:53
6
Ban them all vlogs, drones the lot. Get the time bandits off your waters and telling everyman and their dog what is in there so they can have a free tub of pop ups and then move to the next water and **** that up also.

Non publicity waters are they way ahead in this fishing lark. "No celebrities allowed, only blokes that work a full time job (not in the fishing game)"...48hrs on - 48hrs off......instant ban for clowns taking the piss, no bucketing, drones will be shot on sight.

Keep on keeping on....
roosterbooster roosterbooster
Posts: 539
Post #21 24 May 2026 21:00
3
i think they should ban it all on fisheries, its ruined allot of fisheries, just get out and enjoy your fishing no need to film it and ruin it for others
wandle1 wandle1
Posts: 7,469
Post #22 25 May 2026 00:07
3
In reply to Post #21
Yes agreed and remove the digitalisation of angling as far as possible, it's evil and ruinous ..

Not in the spirit of angling ,at all..
daveman daveman
Posts: 2,377
Post #23 28 May 2026 09:40
0
In reply to Post #20
This is exactly what my last is like, absolutely nothing on Google except there's a lake there, it's lovely, only way on there is to know someone who's a member, and it's very well priced for the working man. Have moved away now and doubt I'll find another jem like that one.
Belch Belch
MODERATORMOD
Posts: 4,660
Post #24 28 May 2026 10:09
0
In reply to Post #1
Last water I was on we had a wannabe vlogger with all the camera kit etc . . .allegedly 'sponsored' by a B league bait company (code for paying ?6 per kg if you order 300kg) you could frequently hear him waffle on about his every move if you were in the next peg . . .

To be honest I wasn't that bothered myself as he caught f all most of the time and eventually decided to be a little more social in the hope of gleaning info off the 'old' dudes which is a category I'm rapidly approaching . . .(but obvs in denial)

Fed him some total bs about spots and he walked away happy . . .should have asked him for some free pop ups to be fair
Canalcarper71 Canalcarper71
Posts: 1,389
Post #25 28 May 2026 10:36
2
I can?t be done with all the carpers posting on social media and getting places rammed if they catch a big fish,this is why I like to fish public waters which are surprisingly quiet,I?m currently on a stretch of canal the carp have spawned and the stretch apparently holds a few mid 20?s and a couple of low 30?s no people around no vloggers rabbiting on what the are going to do,2/3 swims on my side to fish from and the stretch is long,and most of all peace and quiet,i saw a badger and the thunder and lightning in early hours of this morning it was fantastic just to be out.
sirch454 sirch454
Posts: 180
Post #26 28 May 2026 11:29
2
In reply to Post #24
This is the problem with society in general, a lot want to be TikTok or Insta Famous and get money for doing F all. What the feck is an Influencer anyway? Apart from being a jumped up entitled pr!ck that think the world owes them a living. surely no one with a functioning brain cell is influenced by anything these people say or do.
Belch Belch
MODERATORMOD
Posts: 4,660
Post #27 28 May 2026 15:16
3
In reply to Post #26
TBF I'd do only fans way before any carp vlog . . . . . . just trying to work out my audience atm
vossy1 vossy1
MODERATORMOD
Posts: 9,046
Post #28 28 May 2026 15:28
0
In reply to Post #27
Baitman Baitman
Posts: 5,233
Post #29 28 May 2026 17:36
4
In reply to Post #27
Camo slags
Belch Belch
MODERATORMOD
Posts: 4,660
Post #30 28 May 2026 21:02
2
In reply to Post #29
Heresy! Everyone should know my utter distaste for all things camo (apart from the new Korda dark stuff which I have a weird lust for) . . .was thinking more upmarket, perhaps including my elongated and hobbit like hairy toes and some bait mixing whilst naked in a pinny?
Singlebleep Singlebleep
Posts: 2,380
Site deviant...
Site deviant... Post #31 29 May 2026 15:48
1
In reply to Post #27
Blue Rinse Brigade and WI
Reading ALL pages
Are you sure?

This action cannot be undone.

Yes, continue

Loading…