CarpForum.co.uk brand mark, a blue stylized fish with a white eye and a smooth modern look, set in the site header against a clean background CarpForum.co.uk wordmark in a bold flowing script style, reading CarpForum.co.uk, displayed in the site header
Menu
Utils
Go Premium Who's Online Members Weather Photo Gallery Articles
Account
Login Register
Sewerage rats (16 posts / 3,473 views)
mal mal
Posts: 8,986
Post #1 21 Aug 2022 22:44
0
For those interested in how our rivers and beaches are now allowed to be dumping grounds for raw sewage

https://www.nationalworld.com/news/politics/how-did-my-mp-vote-on-sewage-list-of-mps-who-voted-for-and-against-dumping-raw-sewage-into-seas-and-rivers-3433000


Bloody disgraceful
noj
Posts: 11,459
Social photographer...
Social photographer... Post #2 21 Aug 2022 22:58
0
In reply to Post #1
snapper1 snapper1
Posts: 3,101
Post #3 22 Aug 2022 11:07
0
In reply to Post #1
The worrying thing is I'm not shocked enymore
joe_echo joe_echo
Posts: 905
Post #4 22 Aug 2022 11:55
0
In reply to Post #2
My local area is the Norfolk Broads, sadly the MP for area also voted to allow the dumping of raw sewerage.

Our local conservative MP couldn't care less, he doesn't exactly represent the local people. As long as he gets to keep claiming for his expenses, including gas and electric he doesn't seem bothered. If you asked local people if they wanted sewerage dumped into the rivers you would get a resounding no.
Vanhorne
Posts: 319
Post #5 22 Aug 2022 12:44
1
In reply to Post #4
What are the locals doing about this parasite? It continues for as long as the masses accept it by staying complacent.
Rhetorical question I know, if voting changed anything it would be banned.
joe_echo joe_echo
Posts: 905
Post #6 22 Aug 2022 13:11
2
In reply to Post #5
Problem is a big chunk of the residents in my area are older, retired, well off and life long conservatives, lots of farmers too. Its traditionally a conservative safe seat, sadly.

I like to think I'm becoming a thorn in my MP's side as I enjoy pulling him up on his parliamentary votes and asking why he voted to not feed starving kids, or voted not to tax energy companies on profits, or voted not to give nurses a raise but did give himself a nice pay boost.


https://www.theyworkforyou.com/mps/
Singlebleep Singlebleep
Posts: 2,380
Site deviant...
Site deviant... Post #7 22 Aug 2022 18:02
0
In reply to Post #2
Ahh.....when the effluent hits the affluent then things tend to happen
framey framey
Posts: 5,319
Post #8 22 Aug 2022 19:40
1
In reply to Post #7
Everyone needs to go down to sandbanks and curl one out then lol
mal mal
Posts: 8,986
Post #9 6 Sep 2022 22:25
0
And more.....

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-62813573

mal mal
Posts: 8,986
Post #10 30 Oct 2022 22:30
0
St Agnes in Cornwall today....



https://vm.tiktok.com/ZMFAr9jTh/
Goose Goose
Posts: 12,901
Post #11 30 Oct 2022 22:39
0
In reply to Post #6
The affluent are profiting from dumping the effluent if not financially they vote to keep in favour of their parliamentary college's to climb the political leader, all pig at the trough.
mark1009
Posts: 4,738
Post #12 30 Oct 2022 23:18
0
In reply to Post #11
If you look at their voting record, all conservatives vote the same. The whipping system ensures they do so. Also if they want a cabinet post they have to toe the line. Unless the young get off their backsides and vote elsewhere, it's never going to change. Viva la revolution. Don't forget to duck when the bullets start flying.
scozza
Posts: 18,421
Post #13 31 Oct 2022 06:41
0
There is one shocking think about all of this for me. God knows how many years I've bought a fishing license for but the EA have been promoting cleaning the rivers systems up for as long as I can remember!

So now, we can just put virtually anything down them, I wonder how they made the judgement, research papers or back patting ffs. The wold is full of idiots and in a few years time, as usual somebody will say, hey, this is damaging the environment, when the damage has been done ffs
Doing_a_brew Doing_a_brew
Posts: 3,035
Post #14 31 Oct 2022 20:54
0
In reply to Post #5
Voting can change things - it's just that a lot of the population are stupid and easily led by right wing newspapers that tell them what to believe, and that somehow immigration is more important than sewage, gas bills and people literally going to work for next to nothing because the money always funnels upwards.

Ironically, these same people call others ‘sheep'.
NickGordon NickGordon
Posts: 3,121
Post #15 1 Nov 2022 06:53
0
In reply to Post #1
The big problem is that the water companies are privately owned, with many MP's on boards or shareholders so getting their lovely dividends.

These companies should NEVER, like gas and electricity, be in private ownership, they should be nationalised.

The EA is a loser as well, they are not particularly strong in terms of what they can or can't do, and government or councils frequently override them. They are also trying to either do too much or too little. Cover the environment totally and completely, or have a particular brief to cover specifically rivers (as an example).

The watchdogs, need to be bringing cases up against these water companies. Pollution is unacceptable unless it makes money...
Are you sure?

This action cannot be undone.

Yes, continue

Loading…