CarpForum.co.uk brand mark, a blue stylized fish with a white eye and a smooth modern look, set in the site header against a clean background CarpForum.co.uk wordmark in a bold flowing script style, reading CarpForum.co.uk, displayed in the site header
Menu
Utils
Go Premium Who's Online Members Weather Photo Gallery Articles
Account
Login Register
How easily can carp discard barbed hooks? (23 posts / 3,609 views)
kcon1
Posts: 88
Post #1 21 Jun 2023 09:21
0
If your line snaps and a carp is left trailing a barbed hook in its mouth how easy can it discard it? Is it basically stuck until it is next caught or can carp get rid of them after some time?

Just curious as I am thinking of switching to micro barbs, but the only thing putting me off is carp being unable to get rid of them in the event of the line snapping.
oldgeezer oldgeezer
Posts: 27,037
Mr Linky Poo
Mr Linky Poo Post #2 21 Jun 2023 09:28
0
In reply to Post #1
they can get rid of micro barbs very easy and has now been proven and people are realising micro barbs cause less mouth damage to
Ged
Posts: 477
Post #3 21 Jun 2023 09:58
0
In reply to Post #1
A couple of years ago I got snapped off floater fishing in weed using a Super Specialist to 12lb mono. The fish was caught a few months later with my hook and 6" of hooklength still attached.
Whilst I think they can often get rid of them, it's not always the case.
500kg
Posts: 157
Post #4 21 Jun 2023 11:07
1
In reply to Post #3
I hope you claimed the catch as your own.
Goose Goose
Posts: 12,901
Post #5 21 Jun 2023 11:12
1
In reply to Post #2
Disagree Gerry, the amount of dead fish removed from snags whare I live with rigs and leaders still attached suggests they are not the easy to get rid of. Also from this evidence an even bigger problem is lead clips not dropping the lead as the tail rubbers are being pushed on to hard. People seem to think it's acceptable to do this and even tie them on to prevent the lead dropping on the cast when they use a pva bag/ stick . Also the very large club lake complex over the road from me went barbless only a few years ago and now sees less snagged fish and less mouth damage. Sadly carp angling is now full of inexperienced people that haven't got a clue about fish care and many seem to resort to pulling for a break as soon as they snag a fish rather than report it so the bailiffs can get the boat out to free the fish.
CityKoi CityKoi
Posts: 3,243
Post #6 21 Jun 2023 11:22
0
In reply to Post #5
I think the damage question is something that will go on forever and for me its more about the rig and how hard you bully the fish. However a barbless hook is always going to be more likely to come out (I don't mean in an actually landing a fish scenario, I've never noticed any difference to landing rates). I know what id prefer to get hooked in my finger as well
Goose Goose
Posts: 12,901
Post #7 21 Jun 2023 12:37
0
In reply to Post #6
Agree , sadly carp angling is made easy for the lazy barbed hook bolt rig pub chuck angler ,sit back with a few tins .
Greekskii Greekskii
Posts: 3,434
Post #8 21 Jun 2023 12:43
0
In reply to Post #7
All about sense. Fish responsibly and barbed hooks aren't an issue. Barbless cause more mouth damage during the fight imo with them slipping and moving. When it comes to unhooking then barbed is harder and more potential for mouth damage but when you know how to unhook them properly they don't cause any more than a barbless would.

I've seen more mouth damage on runs waters with barbless rules than waters with barbed hooks allowed.
Goose Goose
Posts: 12,901
Post #9 21 Jun 2023 14:30
0
In reply to Post #8
Quote "Barbless cause more mouth damage during the fight imo with them slipping and moving" not the case with the large club over the road from me, this is a very large club and the decision to go barbless wasn't taken on a whim but is proving successful. They also carry out regular rig checks and offer tutorials.
NickGordon NickGordon
Posts: 3,121
Post #10 21 Jun 2023 14:38
0
What prevents hooks being ejected is the weight or tension on them, the lead still on the lead clip, the feeder still attached to the line, what was termed a fixed lead or fixed rig.

Although fixed rigs are banned, the 'new' fixed rig is those badly used items of tackle and ignorance.

If the Mainline breaks, if the lead attachment can slide off the line, then as long as there is no other weight on it the hook can be ejected; however a metre of leadcore is enough weight to stop it being ejected.
If the fish gets snagged, there is tension on the line, preventing the hook being ejected. With 15 or 18lb Line being able to take roughly 4 times its breaking strain in water, a fish is going to have to exert 60lb of thrust to break it.


If you fish with those items of tackle, then a barbless hook may be better, but as pointed out barbless slip and cut causing more damage.


Personally I'd rather fish safely, WITHOUT leadclips, using a run ring and lead that can slide off any broken line, and a micro barb hook
Goose Goose
Posts: 12,901
Post #11 21 Jun 2023 16:59
0
In reply to Post #10
I've not fished lead clips for many years, always use running rigs now. Barbless hooks slipping and cutting is debatable and I believe long shank hooks do more damage. The majority of mouth damage I believe is caused by poor hook hold and poorly constructed rigs and poor angling while playing a fish.as I've said few anglers today actually test and understand the mechanic's of the rigs they use and I'm convince the majority just copy what they see on the net rig wise. The lakes surrounding me are solid with weed now but plenty still fish chods with barbed hooks and cast out to stress they have no chance of playing and landing the fish from.
madi madi
Posts: 345
Post #12 21 Jun 2023 18:20
1
In reply to Post #5
Do those members of that lake normally snog their fish
NickGordon NickGordon
Posts: 3,121
Post #13 21 Jun 2023 20:17
0
In reply to Post #11
Goose,
I know we don't always agree on everything, but I'm with you on this.

Years ago, back in the 1990's I played with helicopter setups (with the original leadcore fly line and naked) in weed and had a massive loss rate compared to inline and pendant setups. Hookpulls, line breaks, lack of indication all convinced me to avoid helicopter setups if possible.

When I started fishing Earith I switched almost exclusively to run rings, either as a bolt rig with tight lines or running leads with slack lines.
Barbless hooks were the rule, so I made sure my rigs were efficient, line aligners on Carp-R-Us Nailers. I lost one or two fish, to hookpulls, one at the net, one after a few minutes as it hit the reeds. The same rig caught minutes later.

These same rigs with barbed hooks worked on Nazeing, Alton, Ardleigh and others effectively.
I did try on a small water with curved hooks and no shrink tubing, and lost fish, yet go back to the line aligner and hooked and landed fish.

Rigs have become fashionable, media, magazines, internet, forum etc.
Old-Cornishman
Posts: 688
Post #14 22 Jun 2023 07:06
0
In reply to Post #1
Perhaps we should also consider the resident wildlife as well as the carp.
I recently rescued a moorhen that had a hook through the skin above its beak ( front shield) and the barb was preventing it coming out. They can be a pest but I don't think any of us would want to see one have a lingering death hung up in a tree.
Greekskii Greekskii
Posts: 3,434
Post #15 22 Jun 2023 07:37
0
In reply to Post #14
Comes back to being responsible though doesn't it. You get stuck in a tree you either get it out or contact a bailiff to report it. Last thing you do is pull for a break. Barbed or barbless, leaving hanging rigs or snagged up rigs is irresponsible and you should do your utmost to retrieve what you've lost instead of leaving it.
Are you sure?

This action cannot be undone.

Yes, continue

Loading…