CarpForum.co.uk brand mark, a blue stylized fish with a white eye and a smooth modern look, set in the site header against a clean background CarpForum.co.uk wordmark in a bold flowing script style, reading CarpForum.co.uk, displayed in the site header
Menu
Utils
Go Premium Who's Online Members Weather Photo Gallery Articles
Account
Login Register
Oh dear.....shocking fish care.... (114 posts / 11,661 views)
Greekskii Greekskii
Posts: 3,434
Post #31 17 May 2022 14:09
0
It's the amount of people that have just commented and ignored it that does it for me. The fact there's even some on this forum that think it's acceptable too.
frothey frothey
Posts: 3,575
Post #32 17 May 2022 15:34
0
In reply to Post #31
Using a tree isn't the problem, its the wandering off for a cuppa and letting the fish flap around. I usually put one end of a weighbar in the crook of a branch and the other on my shoulder.

I'd rather use a tree than those tripod things with big fish TBH......
Greekskii Greekskii
Posts: 3,434
Post #33 17 May 2022 15:56
0
In reply to Post #32
Yeah I'm not against using a tree to weigh a fish, especially if you're on your own. This prat wasn't so there is absolutely no need to do it. Two people and a heavy duty storm pole or a hefty branch if you have to.
MiniWelsh MiniWelsh
Posts: 2,383
Post #34 17 May 2022 16:58
0
In reply to Post #33
And over a mat
scozza
Posts: 18,421
Post #35 17 May 2022 17:22
0
In reply to Post #33
It was probably nice and dry after 10 minutes too. Another thought from me, and something I don't think anybody cares about because we fish for them. All that mass sat on its internal organs that are usually suspended in water, and as usual dragging it to the bank with its lip, I suppose looking at it, leaving it with a chance of dropping a few feet from a tree onto the floor is something else
frothey frothey
Posts: 3,575
Post #36 17 May 2022 17:40
1
In reply to Post #35
Going off on a tangent - people spend far too much time with fish out of the water getting shots. You see some fish photo'd from every angle on the land (and lets face it, it won't just be one pic from each angle), then the ubiquitous "in the lake shots". People checking the shots are ok before moving to the next angle - is it really needed? Chucking a bit of water over them every now and then isn't the answer, as below - think what their internals are going through.....
scozza
Posts: 18,421
Post #37 17 May 2022 17:49
0
In reply to Post #36
The fish is not important any more, all about the “angler” the carper
Fivenil Fivenil
Posts: 2,037
Post #38 17 May 2022 17:54
0
In reply to Post #36
Weigh it, take a photo, put it back. There really isn't any need for multiple shots of the same fish.
ron83 ron83
Posts: 2,061
Post #39 17 May 2022 18:03
0
In reply to Post #38
Maybe if it goes on to die they might think about banning him. Thankfully his names out there so other fisheries can make their own choice.
Goose Goose
Posts: 12,901
Post #40 17 May 2022 18:20
1
In reply to Post #38
No need to weigh it as it was only caught the week before. At least that video has condemned him to never getting a ticket for any half decent venue.
mark1009
Posts: 4,738
Post #41 17 May 2022 18:21
2
Social media is to blame. Everyone wants to be a hero. I'm glad I'm not in/on any of it. This forum excepted.
scozza
Posts: 18,421
Post #42 17 May 2022 19:46
0
In reply to Post #41
Same as
Mozzi Mozzi
Posts: 1,900
Post #43 17 May 2022 20:27
0
In reply to Post #17
Because it's been done since the day we got scales haha.

Not saying it should touch the tree but if you're in attendance you can manage all tge risk perfectly well. If someone tried to smack me for safely weighing a fish they'd get a snack right back mate 😂

Yes tge way he did it is unacceptable like I said
braders1978 braders1978
Posts: 18,195
Post #44 17 May 2022 20:54
2
In reply to Post #43
What snack would you give them
Carpy-Angler Carpy-Angler
Posts: 541
Post #45 17 May 2022 20:55
0
In reply to Post #43
If Bluebell don't ban him serious questions need to
be asked, 🤡
Are you sure?

This action cannot be undone.

Yes, continue

Loading…