CarpForum.co.uk brand mark, a blue stylized fish with a white eye and a smooth modern look, set in the site header against a clean background CarpForum.co.uk wordmark in a bold flowing script style, reading CarpForum.co.uk, displayed in the site header
Menu
Utils
Go Premium Who's Online Members Weather Venues Photo Gallery Articles Events calendar
Account
Login Register
Why ? (79 posts / 5,532 views)
duggs
Posts: 5,559
Post #61 30 Sep 2020 13:57
0
In reply to Post #59
When I was making my bait there was a bit of fuss with one company marketing 'steamies' heavily, so I gave it a try in the mrs vegetable steamer I think a lot of people tried it and it didn't really skin the baits but cooked them through, which went against the idea of lower heat affecting the bait less.

Experimenting was a big part of the draw of making my own bait, once I had a mix I was confident in that rolled well I realised I was only saving about a pound per kilo before I factored my own time in, so really it was more expensive than a quality bait with a proven track record.
ip100 ip100
Posts: 12,499
Post #62 30 Sep 2020 14:03
0
In reply to Post #60
Thank you for that, not really sure what you think I'm going to do with it though. I'm perfectly happy boiling my baits, just like I have since 1989 when I rolled my first lot. Experience will beat theory(science) for me every time
christian
Posts: 1,377
Post #63 30 Sep 2020 15:05
0
We've had boilies since when, late 70s? They worked from the off and still work. They work for large companies and us home rollers alike, they have stood the test of time.

Now I could believe that a large producer might invest in an oven capable of baking baits and might have space to locate it but a home roller, errh, don't think so, my missus would divorce me if I used the kitchen oven for baking my baits and I'm not thinking of buying one for the shed anytime soon.

Boiling works, it's convenient because it can be done anywhere and it's inexpensive, nobody in their right mind could suggest otherwise.
jhhilton1983 jhhilton1983
Posts: 1,950
Post #64 30 Sep 2020 15:54
0
In reply to Post #1


Some absolute tripe being spouted in this thread


" Boiling relies on convection, Baking relies on radiation as a means to transfer its energy" the efficiency of both can vary widely, but fundamentally its the transfer of energy from heat to boilie which differs/

The data is out there if you spend the time to research it on the web. My personal opinion on bait (and I have very limited knowledge on bait making):- If I was a home roller I would boil, if I was producing large quantities in a industrial way I would use steaming. Baking would be my last choice - it costs a lot to heat air when baking
viking
Posts: 1,225
Post #65 30 Sep 2020 16:05
0
In reply to Post #64
Bake a potato or boil a potato. Look what finishes first and at a lower temperature.
Case closed?

I just use paste 😊
Happycarpingedw
Posts: 103
Post #66 30 Sep 2020 16:56
0
In reply to Post #64
Cheers and perhaps it's just cheaper and easier to boil them and it's tried and tested so they have stuck with that.
jhhilton1983 jhhilton1983
Posts: 1,950
Post #67 30 Sep 2020 17:04
0
In reply to Post #65
Look at what finishes first - are they in a race?

how do you define finish? internal temperature, remaining moisture, remaining dry matter, cell structure, carbohydrate structure, startch leaching?

Think you need to define what you want from your end product before saying what the best way to heat treat it
scozza
Posts: 18,429
Post #68 30 Sep 2020 17:14
0
In reply to Post #64
Some absolute tripe being spouted in this thread

You sure, can't see anybody from the non carp section

Something that has always interested me though, how much so called food baits can denature, precisely calculated mixes, boiled, or cooked lol, air dryed, frozen, sometimes for extended periods and defrosted before being air dryed again in some cases
Smurf Smurf
Posts: 3,505
Post #69 30 Sep 2020 17:30
0
In reply to Post #68
And why is denaturing a bad thing? (I keep saying this and have been for years)

To quote Tamberly Powell, M.S., R.D on nutrition " Once proteins are denatured or uncoiled, then enzymes have an easier time facilitating the breakdown of proteins through enzymatic digestion. Enzymatic digestion breaks the protein into smaller peptide chains and ultimately down into single amino acids, which are absorbed into the blood."

They are talking about human digestion which is a little different to fish but the principles of releasing the AA by denaturing allowing better digestion (and detection ) still holds true to our fishy friends

A balanced protein base will break down into a balanced AA mix
scozza
Posts: 18,429
Post #70 30 Sep 2020 17:43
0
In reply to Post #69
Agree about the breakdown. I would love to see some test analysis though from fresh rolled baits that had followed that process if only to put my mind at rest

Now after all that if the AA profile is still very good that's brilliant. I suppose the degradation of the bait regenerates them in a way as they degrade, even after all the above
razorback razorback
Posts: 1,597
Post #71 30 Sep 2020 17:52
0
In reply to Post #56
With any cooking process (or scalding process) its a very simple equation of contact time verses temperature.....the hotter the temperature the less contact time for sealing. The difference with baking to boiling is that the moisture (read that any liquids) would be taken from the bait through baking however boiling would take significantly less out of the bait simply because the transfer medium from Water to air is very easy but liquid to water isn't as there more of an equilibrium.

Steaming (and boiling) are completely different to baking as the high humidity of the steam (and saturated boiling water) inhibits the enthalpy effect on the bait whereas the dry heat of baking increases enthalpy effect and actually 'draws' the moisture out.

In all 3 scenarios you would lose far more liquid additives out of the bait through baking than the other 2 even if all were carried out at the same temperature.

In a nutshell, I am completely with Smurf on this one.
Happycarpingedw
Posts: 103
Post #72 30 Sep 2020 18:00
0
In reply to Post #69
When you denature protein it loses some of its amino acids, also since aminos acids are absorbed in the intestines there better absorbed with less “damage” that's why it's beneficial to take enzyme tablets or acidic foods along with protein to aid in digestion and absorption.

I'm pretty sure carp are carnivores which would mean there system is best suited to digestion raw flesh which means no denatured at all because there is no cooking process.

This would also aid (I assume) in detection due to it being more natural ie raw if that makes sense.
razorback razorback
Posts: 1,597
Post #73 30 Sep 2020 18:09
0
In reply to Post #72
I'm pretty sure carp are carnivores which would mean there system is best suited to digestion raw flesh which means no denatured at all because there is no cooking process.

I would imagine that the whole process of denaturing the proteins and the Holy grail of baitmakers sourcing enzymes to faciltate the breaking down of specific peptide chains are done with the main purpose of giving 'their system' a benficial, helping hand...
framey framey
Posts: 5,324
Post #74 30 Sep 2020 18:31
0
In reply to Post #44
Yup
I found fish meals didn't Often turn into pop ups either when microwaved lol
Happycarpingedw
Posts: 103
Post #75 30 Sep 2020 18:51
0
In reply to Post #73
You do have a point and I agree. I guess it depends on whether your looking at it from a natural approach or a possible more Optimum approach.

If carp can detect amino acids in the water, the real question is can they detect denatured amino acids or the denaturing of them.

Are you sure?

This action cannot be undone.

Yes, continue

Loading…