CarpForum.co.uk brand mark, a blue stylized fish with a white eye and a smooth modern look, set in the site header against a clean background CarpForum.co.uk wordmark in a bold flowing script style, reading CarpForum.co.uk, displayed in the site header
Menu
Utils
Go Premium Who's Online Members Weather Photo Gallery Articles
Account
Login Register
Has mystery become irrelevant or just solved? (30 posts / 3,232 views)
Slackrack Slackrack
Posts: 125
Post #1 26 Dec 2020 19:01
0
A massive thrill since childhood in angling was the unknown mysterious lure of beneath the surface of the water and piecing together my own picture of below through basic watercraft and marker work to build up the pieces to cracking a water but it always left that air of mystery still which I find exiting, my point being with the prevalence of fish spy and deeper tactics becoming a main stay much like when the baitboat entered the scene, I'm of the opinion that personally it serves only to dilute the essence of mystery and am interested in others views.
framey framey
Posts: 5,319
Post #2 26 Dec 2020 19:05
0
In reply to Post #1
There's already a thread like this running involving drones
Richpp1989 Richpp1989
Posts: 2,078
Post #3 26 Dec 2020 19:20
0
In reply to Post #1
I don't think any of that takes away the mystery at all bud, I use my deeper for deep and feature finding that doesn't help towards figuring out the inhabitants of a lake im fishing but yes I think in this day and age you can pretty much find out what lives in each lake I'd go to which is a shame really
Justin_Time Justin_Time
Posts: 370
Post #4 26 Dec 2020 19:51
0
In reply to Post #3
Ive got an exclusive lease on a lake and only I fish it. I don't know whats in there so every bite is a surprise for me, unless Ive seen the fish take. Its a joy and a privilege that ive become used to. I went fishing with a pal on a busy club lake as his guest. It was utterly sole less and I quite sad. I couldn't see the point, until I realised most of the anglers were simply trying to avoid a blank. We discussed whether it was the very bottom of fishing until my pal described another lake where the committee had killed off the weed to make catching and landing the fish easier and I knew he was describing hell.
Richpp1989 Richpp1989
Posts: 2,078
Post #5 26 Dec 2020 20:13
0
In reply to Post #4
Your own lake sounds very interesting bud, you are very lucky to have such a unique opportunity I don't think I'd be able to stay away
Andydave
Posts: 840
Post #6 26 Dec 2020 20:19
0
In reply to Post #1
Angling is whatever you want it to be, whether you use things like a deeper, or lob out marker floats. I generally dont worry about others, that normally keeps the fire ticking over
wandle1 wandle1
Posts: 7,469
Post #7 26 Dec 2020 21:08
0
In reply to Post #4
I know what you mean,one I have had sole use of for over 30 yrs,I never bore of the place,the ecosystem and wildlife,and another,3 acres of again sole use, and I dont really know what's left in the place...sometimes I go to a doubles runs type lake,I enjoy it,but it makes me appreciate the other two places,and a rock hard old school syndicate I'm in too..

I'm lucky...very...the fish dont have to be monsters, but the anticipation has to be big ...or no point in going..
Halfcentury
Posts: 1,284
Post #8 26 Dec 2020 21:49
0
In reply to Post #6
Fishing can be anything you want, trawling, seine netting, harpooning, anything that catches a fish. Cameras, sonar, aerial surveillance, sat nav/chart plotting are used. Then create bespoke fisheries, stock them to the max and feed the fish in marked swims. I could go on but that's enough.
ANGLING is not anything you want it to be, it is a contest between a fish and a man/woman. You pursue the fish in its natural environment to overcome the advantages that this gives the fish with its acute senses and the ability to learn. There is a sporting contract based on respect for the fish for what it is, not its weight. A rod, reel, line, hook, maybe a weight a float and bait are all that is needed for angling. All the tech is disrespectful to the fish and to angling. You can find out anything you need to know using angling gear, learn some skills. If you haven't got the soul to be an angler, all you are is a fisherman. Very different thing.
I know I'm p*ssing in the wind but that's how I feel. Much of modern carp fishing is a parody of skilled angling
Andydave
Posts: 840
Post #9 26 Dec 2020 22:13
0
In reply to Post #8
Tbf, I generally dont take any notice of other anglers, I dont see why you need to, I'll watch a few on YouTube but I wont judge them. Angling is a solitary past time, I honestly dont care about others, I think too many people do, especially carp anglers.
Halfcentury
Posts: 1,284
Post #10 26 Dec 2020 22:29
0
In reply to Post #9
Not a problem, not sitting in judgement. Fish how you want to fish, be a fisherman and enjoy it. Angling is a different philosophy with different values and I don't like to see it devalued.
joe_echo joe_echo
Posts: 905
Post #11 27 Dec 2020 00:13
0
In reply to Post #10
I recently bought a deeper, I was very much in 2 minds about it. I enjoy mystery and working for my fish. However I'm not blessed with my own private lake to fish, I'm also very lacking in time due to having a small child, better 3 quarters, full time job and part time masters to complete.

The deeper saves me valuable time as I can quickly find likely spots without having to thrash the water with a marker float and lead. I do not use it as a fish finder instead I still rely on my water craft and experience to locate them.

For me the mystery is still there and the deeper doesn't detract from that. It just allows me to optimise my limited time.
thicky
Posts: 369
Post #12 27 Dec 2020 04:28
0
In reply to Post #8
Aint that the truth. Spot on.
TeeCee
Posts: 2,009
Post #13 27 Dec 2020 06:54
0
In reply to Post #1
The only difference I see between a Deeper, a float or climbing a tree looking down on the same area that the Deeper is scanning or float trawling is that both the Deeper and float are varying degrees of exactness whereas looking from a tree, you might be able to see obstacles, weedbeds etc, depth on the other hand is going to be a guesstimation. All three methods remove mystery to one degree or another. You can take it one step further and say that counting your drops is removing the element of mystery, making the unknown known.

I suppose it comes down to what you're happy with. Are you happy with an imagined representation in your mind's eye using a float, a bird's eye view from a tree, or a digital snapshot using a Deeper?

Unironicly, the only real possibility of any real sense of mystery I'd say would be to blindly cast out without any aid or any knowledge of where you're fishing and just hope for the best.
essesxandy essesxandy
Posts: 3,197
Post #14 27 Dec 2020 13:08
0
In my experience of running a water mystery seems to be the last thing potential members want. Almost everyone asks "what's the biggest in there" as their first or second question. Tell them that you don't know exactly what the numbers and sizes are and they think you're lying.
Deepers, Fishspys etc. are just fishing aids you can choose to either use or not, I remember people thought that using a marker float was cheating, as for using an old roach pole for lowering a rig under a tree well.........
Justin_Time Justin_Time
Posts: 370
Post #15 27 Dec 2020 13:34
0
In reply to Post #14
'I've got no time so it's fair'

Waraloadash1te

You're missing the point and always will. I hope you find it in golf, although you'll use AI to make it easier...
Are you sure?

This action cannot be undone.

Yes, continue

Loading…