CarpForum.co.uk brand mark, a blue stylized fish with a white eye and a smooth modern look, set in the site header against a clean background CarpForum.co.uk wordmark in a bold flowing script style, reading CarpForum.co.uk, displayed in the site header
Menu
Utils
Go Premium Who's Online Members Weather Photo Gallery Articles
Account
Login Register
Compact rucksack (16 posts / 2,153 views)
Apps316 Apps316
Posts: 2,115
Post #1 3 May 2023 21:19
0
Evening all,

Are there any other Rucksacks on the market like the Thinking anglers one ( size wise & having two carry straps and which stand up on their own) but that are more comfortable to actually use as a rucksack as I love the TA one but just find it uncomfortable whatever I do.

Size wise the TA one is about perfect for me.

Thanks!
NickGordon NickGordon
Posts: 3,121
Post #2 4 May 2023 06:52
0
In reply to Post #1
Have a look at non fishing branded military rucksacks.

They are much better quality than tackle brands.

I've got an MTP Bergen in 100l, but if you want something smaller there are 50-60litres available

https://www.surplusandoutdoors.com/shop/camping-equipment/rucksacks-bags.html
carpyclarkey carpyclarkey
Posts: 1,901
Post #3 4 May 2023 07:13
0
In reply to Post #2
I swapped my TA one for a bag like this one below, far more comfortable and same capacity. Molle loops on the side are great for bank sticks and you can get 4 or 5 pegs in the loops on the lower section at the front

https://www.surplusandoutdoors.com/assault-pack-british-woodland-734926.html
jamescain12
Posts: 87
Post #4 4 May 2023 08:27
0
Speero
Belch Belch
MODERATORMOD
Posts: 4,661
Post #5 4 May 2023 09:34
2
In reply to Post #1
40l Drennan Specialist is comfy enough to lug miles up and down the river for me - sternum strap stops its slipping about and you can clip a quick draw mat to the outside as well as compression straps on the lid for jackets etc - they also do a smaller 30l
Bivvybug Bivvybug
Posts: 2,458
Post #6 4 May 2023 10:38
0
In reply to Post #1
I agree the ta is not that comfortable I think the esp is a good comfortable rucksack
wandle1 wandle1
Posts: 7,469
Post #7 4 May 2023 10:44
0
In reply to Post #5
I use the 30 litre version as said..

I find it good as it 'trains you 'to only take what is needed..plus it is comfy ,I walk to lake using it from home..
Belch Belch
MODERATORMOD
Posts: 4,661
Post #8 4 May 2023 15:07
0
In reply to Post #6
ESP 40l is essentially the same bag as the Specialist 40l with a few differences -

1- ESP top section clips on and off and is a mini tackle pouch with divides / Specialist is a zipped lid that's foil lined / insulated for baits etc

2 - Specialist has compression straps on top of top lid to retain jackets / small mats / ESP does not

3 - ESP has elasticated loops / pouches on all pockets to accept banksticks and alarms / Specialist does not

Other than that they're the same; check the snaplocks if you're using these with Quickdraw mats - I think the ESP ones are a different size to the Specialist even though the Compact ESP Mat is the same size / detail as the Specialist
DarthMullet
Posts: 321
Post #9 4 May 2023 15:10
0
I chopped the straps off my TA rucksack, makes a great carryall.
NickGordon NickGordon
Posts: 3,121
Post #10 4 May 2023 19:37
0
In reply to Post #3
Nice rucksack that Mate, good choice.



In reply to Post #2
I swapped my TA one for a bag like this one below, far more comfortable and same capacity. Molle loops on the side are great for bank sticks and you can get 4 or 5 pegs in the loops on the lower section at the front

https://www.surplusandoutdoors.com/assault-pack-british-woodland-734926.html   
dickweed dickweed
Posts: 1,268
Post #11 4 May 2023 20:23
0
In reply to Post #1
Dutch army daypack.

30 quid for a minter.
framey framey
Posts: 5,320
Post #12 4 May 2023 20:52
0
I'm currently trying one of these

https://www.military1st.co.uk/14002083-mil-tec-molle-us-assault-pack-small-mandra-tan.html

Can clip an unhooking Mat on it with a carabiner
essesxandy essesxandy
Posts: 3,199
Post #13 5 May 2023 08:16
0
Am I the only person who thinks you're better off having a larger rucksack only partially filled, than a small rucksack filled to the gunnels?
I use a Nash 60ltr and can basically fish from the outside pockets, but can easily accommodate coats, waterproofs, etc. when required.
scaley&dark
Posts: 5,565
Post #14 9 May 2023 18:04
0
In reply to Post #13
I agree with you, Larger for me - minimum gear, but spare space in the main compartment if needed.

Medium to larger rucksacks are better to carry as there are designed to fit on the whole spine/hip points and distribute the carrying weight so much better, and more comfortably than small ones.
IMHO A 38 litre NI Patrol pack is probably the best compromise.

I have owned a TA Rucksack, but although a lovely design, I found it uncomfortable to carry it with a full load in it, as it didn't sit lower on my back or hips.
Just my personal opinion.

AndyClark AndyClark
Posts: 5,815
Post #15 9 May 2023 18:24
0
In reply to Post #14
you're not alone there,I've got the compact and full size speero rucksacks and the full size is so much more comfy,the compact sits across my shoulder where as the full size goes down my back to the small of my back. better distribution of the weight in the rucksack...I only ever throw my compact on my barrow.
finbob finbob
Posts: 3,466
Post #16 10 May 2023 08:18
0
In reply to Post #13
Spot on -The TA ruck type sacks are too small for me -the main compartment needs to hold more (clothing ,bait ,food) so 50/60litres is far more user friendly. God knows why TA,ESP etc dont do a bigger version of an existing rucker.

The Greys prodigy is my go to but the sabre one looks good.
Reading ALL pages
Are you sure?

This action cannot be undone.

Yes, continue

Loading…