Ive got the high version already and love it but its quite a bulky chair - what is the difference between hi and lo

Is it worth having both or just overkill

In reply to Post #1
I replied on the other thread - difference is 12cm (seat height). I actually considered keeping both; the low for under a brolly, and a high for lounging around in the sun, but concluded that was preposterous, so just have the low version now.

In reply to Post #2
Thanks for the reply - is the 12cm just the extension in the legs or is the actual seat back higher?

sorry if thats obvious but I too am considering having both versions

Is there an elastic on thses chairs?

In reply to Post #3
To be honest, I am not sure, but I didn't notice a significant difference.

@Sundance - there's no elastics.

In reply to Post #4
Not sure what you mean by elastics?

Its the chair not the bed Im referring too - I have the bed and its no elastic Im almost certain my chair doesnt have elastic either

No elastic on chairs.

Rob the only difference is the legs are longer on the high version. The seat part itself is exactly the same size and shape on both models.

Thanks guys.

In reply to Post #8
I've had many “seats” over the years,the solar low is so comfortable......it's a keeper👍

In reply to Post #1
I would rather keep the high chair and get one of the trakker bedchair chairs that can be used as a low chair. 3 chairs for all scenarios.

In reply to Post #10
I already have the trakker levelite transformer chair the solar is in a completely different league - no comparison

In reply to Post #10
Exactly what i have - I use the trakker one for all my UK fishing as it doubles up on the bed or as a low chair.

Solar High chair for longer session (Usually in france) and also as a make shift office chair