High I'm looking for a lens for my Canon M50 mirror less camera. I've seen the Canon EF-M 32mm f1.4 recommended, but I've also seen the Sigma 30mm f 1.4 which is considerably cheaper.
Can anyone advise if there are any pros or cons between the two lens , I'm also assuming they do the Sigma in an m fit version to fit the M50 camera .
Can anyone advise if there are any pros or cons between the two lens , I'm also assuming they do the Sigma in an m fit version to fit the M50 camera .
In reply to Post #1
I may be wrong with that lens, but sigma offer a mount swap service. Might be useful down the line now canon have bought out an apsc r mount camera. The m mount will now be defunct and the lenses won't be adaptable to other systems
I may be wrong with that lens, but sigma offer a mount swap service. Might be useful down the line now canon have bought out an apsc r mount camera. The m mount will now be defunct and the lenses won't be adaptable to other systems
In reply to Post #1
Yes the Sigma is available in that mount for your camera. It's a good quality lens and produces nice images.
Yes the Sigma is available in that mount for your camera. It's a good quality lens and produces nice images.
In reply to Post #1
The comparison sites say the EF-M is better but not by much:
https://versus.com/en/canon-ef-m-32mm-f-1-4-stm-vs-sigma-30mm-f1-4-dc-dn-c
There's a thread comparing the 2 on dpreview and the consensus is if you want the best (optically) then you need the EF-M. If you just want very good, the Sigma is a sound lens.
Not used the Sigma myself but the EF-M is the best lens I've ever used.
The comparison sites say the EF-M is better but not by much:
https://versus.com/en/canon-ef-m-32mm-f-1-4-stm-vs-sigma-30mm-f1-4-dc-dn-c
There's a thread comparing the 2 on dpreview and the consensus is if you want the best (optically) then you need the EF-M. If you just want very good, the Sigma is a sound lens.
Not used the Sigma myself but the EF-M is the best lens I've ever used.