In reply to Post #101
Once they really had a loaded gun in their hands they wouldn't have a clue what to do with it
I would shoot Braders first
Once they really had a loaded gun in their hands they wouldn't have a clue what to do with it
I would shoot Braders first
In reply to Post #104
16000+ I should give up
16000+ I should give up
In reply to Post #105
Don't you mean effluent.
Don't you mean effluent.
In reply to Post #106
You can't even shoot your load at your age
You can't even shoot your load at your age
In reply to Post #109
Can still hang a towel off mine
How about you?
Can still hang a towel off mine
How about you?
In reply to Post #110
Did it freeze?
Sorry, I'll stay out of it
Did it freeze?
Sorry, I'll stay out of it
In reply to Post #110
A hand towel
A hand towel
In reply to Post #112
What!! One of these???

That's impressive 😮
What!! One of these???

That's impressive 😮
In reply to Post #113
Full bath robe
Full bath robe
In reply to Post #113
If its from a dolls house he might just be able rest it on
If its from a dolls house he might just be able rest it on
In reply to Post #114
In reply to Post #72
The local retail park near me was gridlocked all around today, and there isn't one cycle lane....
I don't get the ‘just keep piling more cars onto the roads' argument. It's ridiculous. We HAVE to provide a safe, greener alternative wherever possible, otherwise cities will just become gridlocked pollution-fests. It's not a conspiracy, it's common sense. The cities with the best cycling infrastructure have the most cyclists commuting, and the majority of those are each taking a car off the roads.
And what's with people in cars (almost always one person per car) always blaming cyclists and cycle lanes for the congestion they're sat in...oh the irony.
The local retail park near me was gridlocked all around today, and there isn't one cycle lane....
I don't get the ‘just keep piling more cars onto the roads' argument. It's ridiculous. We HAVE to provide a safe, greener alternative wherever possible, otherwise cities will just become gridlocked pollution-fests. It's not a conspiracy, it's common sense. The cities with the best cycling infrastructure have the most cyclists commuting, and the majority of those are each taking a car off the roads.
And what's with people in cars (almost always one person per car) always blaming cyclists and cycle lanes for the congestion they're sat in...oh the irony.
In reply to Post #117
Spot on
I'm not going to wade in on all this lock down conspiracy nonsense, but nice to hear some sense.
Spot on
I'm not going to wade in on all this lock down conspiracy nonsense, but nice to hear some sense.
In reply to Post #117
Common sense indeed. The caveat here is that it doesn't seem to be that common.
Common sense indeed. The caveat here is that it doesn't seem to be that common.
Forgetting about Oxford for a moment.
Is it common sense to gentrify an area where councillors, ex MPS and people of influence live, an area where there is high car ownership and high property prices. Then close off their roads and divert the traffic, cause gridlock to an area where poorer people live and there is low car ownership. An area where Ella Adoo-Kissi-Debrah who used to live previous to the scheme before pollution helped to kill her and that was put on her death certificate. This area is now worse.
A scheme that her mum Rosamund who's a clean air campaigner is against.
Do you think common sense has been applied to this scheme?
Is it common sense to gentrify an area where councillors, ex MPS and people of influence live, an area where there is high car ownership and high property prices. Then close off their roads and divert the traffic, cause gridlock to an area where poorer people live and there is low car ownership. An area where Ella Adoo-Kissi-Debrah who used to live previous to the scheme before pollution helped to kill her and that was put on her death certificate. This area is now worse.
A scheme that her mum Rosamund who's a clean air campaigner is against.
Do you think common sense has been applied to this scheme?