CarpForum.co.uk brand mark, a blue stylized fish with a white eye and a smooth modern look, set in the site header against a clean background CarpForum.co.uk wordmark in a bold flowing script style, reading CarpForum.co.uk, displayed in the site header
Menu
Utils
Go Premium Who's Online Members Weather Photo Gallery Articles
Account
Login Register
YouTube carp videos (80 posts / 9,484 views)
Cypry1994 Cypry1994
Posts: 86
Post #61 22 Apr 2020 00:08
0
In reply to Post #60
Really? I had a quick look but couldn't find anything not that I would fish it most likely too far away for me
NOJOAKES NOJOAKES
Posts: 3,289
Post #62 22 Apr 2020 07:17
0
Jacob London carper is a good watch 👍🏻
bluebeat13
Posts: 2,168
Post #63 22 Apr 2020 07:46
0
In reply to Post #62
Again, he seems like a good kid, but I wouldn't be surprised if they found him floating in the Coppermill!
clicky clicky
Posts: 9,545
Post #64 22 Apr 2020 08:20
0
In reply to Post #61
its day ticket anyway.
The_Saint The_Saint
Posts: 2,072
Post #65 22 Apr 2020 08:33
0
In reply to Post #62
agree, absolutely lovely lad, feet on the ground, public transport fishing at its best.
yonny yonny
Posts: 7,934
Post #66 22 Apr 2020 08:34
0
In reply to Post #65
There was a feature on the guy on Cypography. It was decent
Hooterman
Posts: 316
Post #67 22 Apr 2020 09:30
0
In reply to Post #64
Not for nights it isn't season ticket only.
NOJOAKES NOJOAKES
Posts: 3,289
Post #68 22 Apr 2020 10:20
0
In reply to Post #59
That's my only gripe, tbh not only them. They go onto waters get there footage catch the fish then piss off and stick it all over the web. That poor guy that's been chasing a target fish now has a load of sheep turning up. Luckily they'd never have a hope in hell of getting on my syndicate. Which is good as they aren't to far from where I live
yonny yonny
Posts: 7,934
Post #69 22 Apr 2020 10:32
0
In reply to Post #68
This is a catch 22 though. We're all raving about how great it is to have so much content to enjoy during lock down but at the same time we're slating anglers for publicising waters. They have to fish somewhere. I was looking at the stick Greg Ellis got for naming Nazeing. It was ridiculous. It's not like some top secret water that nobody's heard of is it lol. Now fair play if someone was doing it down the Mere I might agree with some of the criticism but it's hardly a crime on well known waters that are pretty much open access.
NOJOAKES NOJOAKES
Posts: 3,289
Post #70 22 Apr 2020 10:37
0
In reply to Post #69
I totally agree it is catch 22. But I think when you look at some of the lesser known intimate waters like ditching, I can't imagine it's done that lake much good with Carl and Alex broadcasting it. But as you say, the content has to come from somewhere
yonny yonny
Posts: 7,934
Post #71 22 Apr 2020 10:55
0
In reply to Post #70
For sure. What we don't need is 8 videos a week filmed at Linear which is what we'd end up with if these guys didn't fish somewhere a little interesting.
clicky clicky
Posts: 9,545
Post #72 22 Apr 2020 11:17
0
In reply to Post #67
yes I know..
bluebeat13
Posts: 2,168
Post #73 22 Apr 2020 12:05
0
There's an endless number of day ticket waters and probably some clubs that would be happy for the publicity. Plenty of variety available out there to feed the hunger of the masses.

I just think if a club or syndicate has been quietly going about its business for years without the need or desire to court publicity it's a bit disrespectful to blow those waters wide open in the name of entertainment, earn a living from doing so, then move on to the next place. Just my opinion.
yonny yonny
Posts: 7,934
Post #74 22 Apr 2020 12:14
1
In reply to Post #73
I can think of nothing worse than watching these guys queuing up to fill it in on a day ticket water.
If a water has no publicity ban in place then they are happy with publicity imo, regardless of how many years they've been quietly going about their business. Most of these waters have websites lol.
I agree that you don't do it on no-publicity venues, but as far as I can tell no-one has?
bluebeat13
Posts: 2,168
Post #75 22 Apr 2020 13:09
0
In reply to Post #74
It's not the club management or lake owners I'm talking about, they obviously want full banks and subs coming in, and they will be the ones who decide on any publicity restrictions. It's the anglers, who likely have no control of these things, who see the negatives of fishing as YouTube entertainment.
Are you sure?

This action cannot be undone.

Yes, continue

Loading…