In reply to Post #49
Used to have a few pictures of mine
All northern of course
Used to have a few pictures of mine
All northern of course
In reply to Post #50
What, like Maidstone?
What, like Maidstone?
In reply to Post #51
Never heard of that, is it a **** hole?
Never heard of that, is it a **** hole?
In reply to Post #52
Yup. Not as bad as Croydon tho 💩
Yup. Not as bad as Croydon tho 💩
In reply to Post #40
Dave Moore and Paul Fowler would be very interesting.......
Dave did a little facebook video a few months back on Rollin Baits doing a Q&A session.
Paul is very much under the radar quietly turning out established baits
Dave Moore and Paul Fowler would be very interesting.......
Dave did a little facebook video a few months back on Rollin Baits doing a Q&A session.
Paul is very much under the radar quietly turning out established baits
I would rather listen (and talk) to under the radar bait people than those commercially involved.
In reply to Post #55
But on the flip side, you run the risk of it being just a platform for people to discuss bait theories.
But on the flip side, you run the risk of it being just a platform for people to discuss bait theories.
In reply to Post #56
If you're interested in bait making surely that is a good thing?
If you're interested in bait making surely that is a good thing?
In reply to Post #56
The most controversial subject in angling
The most controversial subject in angling
In reply to Post #58
Mark from specialized hookbaits would, I'm sure, make an interesting guest. He always seems to look at things with a questioning mind and causes much thought and debate.
Mark from specialized hookbaits would, I'm sure, make an interesting guest. He always seems to look at things with a questioning mind and causes much thought and debate.
In reply to Post #59
oh blimmey....
oh blimmey....
Did I hear correctly? I thought I heard Jason Ryder say he never calculated the protein content of his baits or the amino acid percentages. Surprised me.
In reply to Post #63
baits based on results and not theories
Careful what you are saying, this is close to the bait thread you know, could cause an uproar
Theory is one thing, the results are everything, for me anyway
baits based on results and not theories
Careful what you are saying, this is close to the bait thread you know, could cause an uproar
Theory is one thing, the results are everything, for me anyway
In reply to Post #57
What percentage of anglers make their own baits? Very very minimal. A bait podcast it would just be the same subjects week in week out. Most anglers just want a bait that works, not listen to theories about stuff that isn't in any of the bait they use, or in any bait in fact. Nor would they want three hours of "we found this, can't tell you what it is though. It's Top notch, secret squirrel stuff, but you can only find out how good it is if you buy XYZ bait"
Angler catches **** all, blames the bait and the cycle continues. It's why there are literally hundreds of bait companies, because there is no one magic bait. It's as simple as that.
What percentage of anglers make their own baits? Very very minimal. A bait podcast it would just be the same subjects week in week out. Most anglers just want a bait that works, not listen to theories about stuff that isn't in any of the bait they use, or in any bait in fact. Nor would they want three hours of "we found this, can't tell you what it is though. It's Top notch, secret squirrel stuff, but you can only find out how good it is if you buy XYZ bait"
Angler catches **** all, blames the bait and the cycle continues. It's why there are literally hundreds of bait companies, because there is no one magic bait. It's as simple as that.
In reply to Post #61
Just a quicky , is protein content a blind ally, isn't it all about what thay can get from a bait before thay have a poo
Just a quicky , is protein content a blind ally, isn't it all about what thay can get from a bait before thay have a poo