CarpForum.co.uk brand mark, a blue stylized fish with a white eye and a smooth modern look, set in the site header against a clean background CarpForum.co.uk wordmark in a bold flowing script style, reading CarpForum.co.uk, displayed in the site header
Menu
Utils
Go Premium Who's Online Members Weather Photo Gallery Articles
Account
Login Register
7 40s - makes sense (728 posts / 73,037 views)
AndyClark AndyClark
Posts: 5,815
Post #397 5 Nov 2021 21:36
0
surely I they're all using/were using the product their catch rates are going to drastically slow down.
nicksmith1 nicksmith1
Posts: 668
Post #398 5 Nov 2021 21:49
0
In reply to Post #397
That is going to be the interesting bit about this... can't wait to see how ‘the accused' get on in matches in the future. I guess their future results will help us all determine whether they were ‘guilty' or not?
Sussexcarper93
Posts: 279
Post #399 5 Nov 2021 22:11
0
In reply to Post #393
Even if they earned £100k a year, which they don't, it's soon swallowed up with loads of individual legal cases. It's all ********, nobody will get sued.
Alby
Posts: 306
Post #400 5 Nov 2021 22:11
0
In reply to Post #393
Peanuts.
Alby
Posts: 306
Post #401 5 Nov 2021 22:13
0
In reply to Post #399
Nobody has or will get sued.

And they wont stop using either, addicts.
Barbel-Arch Barbel-Arch
Posts: 157
Post #402 5 Nov 2021 23:04
0
In reply to Post #379
Christ, whos written that, a 9 year old ??

If they want to be taken seriously, they need someone composing their statements who can string a few sentences together, and someone to proof read it before they post it. Awful.
noj
Posts: 11,459
Social photographer...
Social photographer... Post #403 5 Nov 2021 23:17
0
In reply to Post #402
They're just trying to keep the trolls off their flatform
Little pussies threatening to tell the teacher, what an embarrassment
Alby
Posts: 306
Post #404 5 Nov 2021 23:19
0
In reply to Post #402
If these idiots were serious dont you think they would of spent £250 on a solicitors letter to this forums owner asking for this thread to be taken down?

Guilty as charged
bluebeat13
Posts: 2,168
Post #405 6 Nov 2021 05:03
0
In reply to Post #404
Please correct me if I'm wrong, but are all the names mentioned part of the ‘England Carp Team' or whatever they want to call themselves?

And is the manager of said team, Rob Hughes, not a qualified lawyer? They made enough of a song and dance about it on his Carp Cast bits.

This is pure conjecture, but would the manager of a team who is well versed in the law at the very least spell check a public statement from his team members?
darkoL darkoL
Posts: 1,822
Post #406 6 Nov 2021 05:13
0
In reply to Post #405
Did they now figure out what they are using or are they still changing stories every few hours?
Sussexcarper93
Posts: 279
Post #407 6 Nov 2021 06:23
0
In reply to Post #406
No, it's not available from tackle shops and the last thing you'd choose out of a list of 100 things but it's CC Moore bloodworm liquid
scozza
Posts: 18,421
Post #408 6 Nov 2021 07:43
0
Legal action? lower than a snakes belly springs to mind

Why, because some “anglers” whoever they really are have been called out for using a hormone substance that is prescribed by a medical professional to give them a distinct and unfair advantage over others. In return falsified catch results to claim fame and then not admit to it when questioned

All this to try and save face, i guess there is something in the old saying “cheats never win”

Busted is the word we are looking for I guess? disgraceful could be another, as is trying to threaten legal action to silence the masses. It's a pastime based on merit and respect that's why people have taken serious offence, I guess they feel cheated?

What's the saying, sometimes you have to look in the mirror at YOURSELF and reflect. Don't try and blame others, blame yourself. You get what you get
Chuffy Chuffy
Posts: 6,794
Post #409 6 Nov 2021 08:32
0
Interesting what Ian Russel says about the BCAC HERE (@2hrs 45seconds)
AndyClark AndyClark
Posts: 5,815
Post #410 6 Nov 2021 08:44
0
like previously mentioned,the only legal advice theyve taken is pick the phone up to Rob Hughes....if legal advice had been given they would have given them a prepared statement to issue....
I'm not one to pick up people's literacy and spelling as mine isn't the best,however in this case you would think they would have taken the time to at least spellcheck or asked the so called legal professional they consulted to write it for them.
Tadpole2 Tadpole2
Posts: 125
Post #411 6 Nov 2021 08:57
0
In reply to Post #410
''Interesting what Ian Russel says about the BCAC HERE (@2hrs 45seconds)''


Methinks Ian knows......
Are you sure?

This action cannot be undone.

Yes, continue

Loading…