In reply to Post #15
The waters I will be fishing are all pretty small including canals so I won't need to hit big distances and the shorter length will help in the tighter swims where a 12ft rod would be a hinderance. I generally prefer to keep mobile and find the fish where possible, heaving around loads of gear and being stuck in one swim just doesn't appeal to me. I also have limited storage space at home. From experience with the other types of fishing I do I find casting accuracy is better with shorter rods. Rod styles go through phases when I first started Carping in the late 80s rods were generally 11 ft and much lighter test curves than nowadays, so a 12ft 3lb test curve rod was also a latest craze at some point. In beach fishing, which I also do, the latest fashion is for much longer rods 14-15ft rather than 12 ft which was the norm a decade ago but again all depends on the style of fishing you do.
The waters I will be fishing are all pretty small including canals so I won't need to hit big distances and the shorter length will help in the tighter swims where a 12ft rod would be a hinderance. I generally prefer to keep mobile and find the fish where possible, heaving around loads of gear and being stuck in one swim just doesn't appeal to me. I also have limited storage space at home. From experience with the other types of fishing I do I find casting accuracy is better with shorter rods. Rod styles go through phases when I first started Carping in the late 80s rods were generally 11 ft and much lighter test curves than nowadays, so a 12ft 3lb test curve rod was also a latest craze at some point. In beach fishing, which I also do, the latest fashion is for much longer rods 14-15ft rather than 12 ft which was the norm a decade ago but again all depends on the style of fishing you do.
In reply to Post #3
I have to agree with that in terms of Nash gear.
Shocking quality, overpriced. I am surprised it sells tbh. Maybe it's just well marketed to the kids.
I have to agree with that in terms of Nash gear.
Shocking quality, overpriced. I am surprised it sells tbh. Maybe it's just well marketed to the kids.
In reply to Post #15
I'm fishing an old quarry at the moment with tiny swims you couldn't swing a cat in. I had one session with my 12ft rods and they were not only horrible to use there but also an absolute nightmare to carry around with through all the narrow gaps. There is a market for them and a practical reason for some even if they are fashionable.
I'm fishing an old quarry at the moment with tiny swims you couldn't swing a cat in. I had one session with my 12ft rods and they were not only horrible to use there but also an absolute nightmare to carry around with through all the narrow gaps. There is a market for them and a practical reason for some even if they are fashionable.
In reply to Post #18
Fashionable maybe but short rods for carp are not a new idea. Chris Yates caught the former British record on a 9ft 11 cane rod in 1980 and that was built by Richard Walker in the 50s!
Fashionable maybe but short rods for carp are not a new idea. Chris Yates caught the former British record on a 9ft 11 cane rod in 1980 and that was built by Richard Walker in the 50s!
In reply to Post #12
For hooks all I use these days are Gardner muggas. Perfect for bottom baits ,wafters or pop ups. Sting, reliable and sharp out of the packet.
For hooks all I use these days are Gardner muggas. Perfect for bottom baits ,wafters or pop ups. Sting, reliable and sharp out of the packet.
In reply to Post #1
I'd get a full Dymag setup including the rod bag and net. The whole concept is exceptional. It's certainly not cheap, but high quality craftsmanship never is.
I'd get a full Dymag setup including the rod bag and net. The whole concept is exceptional. It's certainly not cheap, but high quality craftsmanship never is.
In reply to Post #21
I'm seriously considering the rods, not sure about the net which I'm sure is superb but the price tag puts me off compared to some of the other options out there.
Any idea how the dymag stalkers compare to the Harrison stalkers in terms of playing action?
I'm seriously considering the rods, not sure about the net which I'm sure is superb but the price tag puts me off compared to some of the other options out there.
Any idea how the dymag stalkers compare to the Harrison stalkers in terms of playing action?
In reply to Post #22
I'm sure they are the same blank
I'm sure they are the same blank
In reply to Post #22
I've not tried the Harrison's for a comparison so I can't say. Although Dymags are on Harrison blanks, they're to Dymags own spec from what I gather with a 1k weave. I loves my Dymags, coupled together with SS2600's, it's the tits. One hand casting, no problem. They are through action. Had cats to 35lb on them and they handled moggies without a hitch, and if you've ever had a reasonable size cat, you'll know how insanely hard they fight.
Net wise, you could buy a JRC two piece net that would fit in the Dymag side compartment. I didn't go for the Dymag net at first and instead got the JRC one which is very well made, nice and stiff unlike many other nets out there. Then I went all fancy pants and brought the Dymag net...well bling. The one thing I would say that's very good with the Dymag net is that you can get the extension which is great for when you're fishing high banks etc which is the only stalking net I know of that does this and that's super compact.
JRC two piece landing net: https://www.anglingdirect.co.uk/jrc-stealth-landing-net-42
I've not tried the Harrison's for a comparison so I can't say. Although Dymags are on Harrison blanks, they're to Dymags own spec from what I gather with a 1k weave. I loves my Dymags, coupled together with SS2600's, it's the tits. One hand casting, no problem. They are through action. Had cats to 35lb on them and they handled moggies without a hitch, and if you've ever had a reasonable size cat, you'll know how insanely hard they fight.
Net wise, you could buy a JRC two piece net that would fit in the Dymag side compartment. I didn't go for the Dymag net at first and instead got the JRC one which is very well made, nice and stiff unlike many other nets out there. Then I went all fancy pants and brought the Dymag net...well bling. The one thing I would say that's very good with the Dymag net is that you can get the extension which is great for when you're fishing high banks etc which is the only stalking net I know of that does this and that's super compact.
JRC two piece landing net: https://www.anglingdirect.co.uk/jrc-stealth-landing-net-42
In reply to Post #24
Thanks for the reply, do you have the 2.75 tc? I was thinking of one of each tc but wasn't sure if I may be a bit under gunned with the 2.25 which I was thinking to use as a dedicated freelining and surface rod (and maybe even for twitching sprats for pike in the winter). That JRC net looks perfect for what I need.
I am going to get some build options priced up, the Dymag brochure is a little sparse on details so will fire him an email to see what guides he has etc.
Thanks once again for all the replies gents.
Cheers
J
Thanks for the reply, do you have the 2.75 tc? I was thinking of one of each tc but wasn't sure if I may be a bit under gunned with the 2.25 which I was thinking to use as a dedicated freelining and surface rod (and maybe even for twitching sprats for pike in the winter). That JRC net looks perfect for what I need.
I am going to get some build options priced up, the Dymag brochure is a little sparse on details so will fire him an email to see what guides he has etc.
Thanks once again for all the replies gents.
Cheers
J
In reply to Post #25
Personally I'd get both the same test curve, though it's all very personal. I've got the 2 3/4 and love them for small waters or tight swims. They're the perfect stalking rod for me.
There are other options out there. Century do a small rod. One of my mates raves over his set
I'd call the guy at Dymag if you get the chance. It might take a while to get to speak to him as he is very busy and it's not his day job from what I gather. Don't get disheartened if it takes ages to contact him as some do from what I've read. Just leave a message or two on his phone and I'm sure he'll get back to you soon enough. He is decent to deal with and not a knob.
Personally I'd get both the same test curve, though it's all very personal. I've got the 2 3/4 and love them for small waters or tight swims. They're the perfect stalking rod for me.
There are other options out there. Century do a small rod. One of my mates raves over his set
I'd call the guy at Dymag if you get the chance. It might take a while to get to speak to him as he is very busy and it's not his day job from what I gather. Don't get disheartened if it takes ages to contact him as some do from what I've read. Just leave a message or two on his phone and I'm sure he'll get back to you soon enough. He is decent to deal with and not a knob.
Hi All,
Got offered a pair of Harrison stalkers in good condition for a decent price so that's rod and reels sorted thanks for the advice. Now onto a rucksack or carryall. I have a drennan roving ruckbag which is the perfect size but has begun to fall apart after a few months use so got to get something else but not sure which just needs to hold a flask some food and a few bits of end tackle. I have the korum accessory chair and bag which far to big and heavy for what I need so was looking a using a bait bucket as a seat. Any recommendations greatly appreciated.
Cheers
J
Got offered a pair of Harrison stalkers in good condition for a decent price so that's rod and reels sorted thanks for the advice. Now onto a rucksack or carryall. I have a drennan roving ruckbag which is the perfect size but has begun to fall apart after a few months use so got to get something else but not sure which just needs to hold a flask some food and a few bits of end tackle. I have the korum accessory chair and bag which far to big and heavy for what I need so was looking a using a bait bucket as a seat. Any recommendations greatly appreciated.
Cheers
J
In reply to Post #27
id go thinking anglers for your rucksack, ive had mine a year and use it every week and its never missed a beat.
compact but well laid out, and you've got the buckles on the top to attach a roll up mat.
id go thinking anglers for your rucksack, ive had mine a year and use it every week and its never missed a beat.
compact but well laid out, and you've got the buckles on the top to attach a roll up mat.
In reply to Post #28
Thanks for the suggestion, I will check that out now.
Thanks for the suggestion, I will check that out now.
In reply to Post #27
I have a Miltec rucksack for short sessions. It's got loads of pockets as it's based on a military rucksack. Well made and robust and it was only £32!
I have a Miltec rucksack for short sessions. It's got loads of pockets as it's based on a military rucksack. Well made and robust and it was only £32!