CarpForum.co.uk brand mark, a blue stylized fish with a white eye and a smooth modern look, set in the site header against a clean background CarpForum.co.uk wordmark in a bold flowing script style, reading CarpForum.co.uk, displayed in the site header
Menu
Utils
Go Premium Who's Online Members Weather Photo Gallery Articles
Account
Login Register
Small rucksack (62 posts / 6,032 views)
NickGordon NickGordon
Posts: 3,121
Post #16 26 Apr 2020 07:43
0
In reply to Post #1
Go to British Army rucksacks.
They last, take the abuse and all the gear you need
Bivvybug Bivvybug
Posts: 2,458
Post #17 26 Apr 2020 07:57
0
In reply to Post #16
The esp rucksack is very comfortable very basic at a good price
MARKerz
Posts: 1,944
Post #18 26 Apr 2020 08:22
0
In reply to Post #1
As your looking for a small 20 ltr rucksack I take it it's on your back and not a barrow? Day short sessions? What you looking to put in it?

All the above have a bearing, I fish short sessions of 3 - 6 hours with minimal equipment and use a cheap crappy Karrimor rucksack, it works fine and has lasted 3 years so far.

If your walking miles then I'd be looking at Osprey rucksacks, if on a barrow then whatever you like.

I brought a Trakker rucksack 10+ years ago, it was so uncomfortable, never purchased a fishing one again.
RobbyMalfliet RobbyMalfliet
Posts: 15,952
Post #19 26 Apr 2020 08:29
0
I use the ESP one and i love it.
Speero Tackle brings out a small rucksack as well soon and it's gonna be spot on!
Carew Carew
Posts: 404
Post #20 26 Apr 2020 08:46
0
I like the korum set up too. Everything you need for a short session, including a chair, for a short session or a day trotting on the river.
crablegg
Posts: 6
Post #21 26 Apr 2020 15:27
0
In reply to Post #19
Any idea when
RobbyMalfliet RobbyMalfliet
Posts: 15,952
Post #22 26 Apr 2020 18:30
0
In reply to Post #21
Spoke to one of the employees a few weeks ago and the last prototype was on test, so i expect it to be out shortly after this Covid-19 thing has slowed down a bit.
Factory is closed now i think.
CatertonCarper CatertonCarper
Posts: 72
Post #23 27 Apr 2020 10:40
0
In reply to Post #1
Thinking Anglers, ruck sack is small, but takes a lot of tackle. The benefit I found is that I only now take what I really need, used to take a huge carryall with loads of extra stuff.
The TA stuff is very well made and will stand the test of time.
BlankasorusRex BlankasorusRex
Posts: 5,282
Post #24 27 Apr 2020 10:53
0
There was a company exhibiting at NAS. I think they were called Cult Tackle. Although I didn't really pull their stuff around, it did seem well made from the little bit of time I played with it.

Might be worth a look?


Also the sonik sk trv ruckbag maybe.
essesxandy essesxandy
Posts: 3,199
Post #25 27 Apr 2020 11:03
0
In reply to Post #14
Totally agree. I had the Cotswold Vulpine which is a rip-off of the TA rucksack and although it would easily take my tackle and some bait, there just wasn't room for a winter jacket etc. And it was like a torture device to carry. I stick with my old and battered Nash 50ltr (?) and don't fill it unnecessarily.
Bivvybug Bivvybug
Posts: 2,458
Post #26 27 Apr 2020 12:57
0
In reply to Post #23
The ta rucksack is good quality and does take a fair amount but what we are saying it is uncomfortable not only on here but at the lake blokes say the same the Cotswold rucksack are the same I had a mk3 very uncomfortable the esp is the most comfortable one I've ever used and people say the korum ruckbag is good to
andy2461 andy2461
Posts: 1,402
Post #27 27 Apr 2020 13:17
0
In reply to Post #26
british army patrol pack

dont pay the carp tax,built to last,MOLLE on the outside so you can customize it to your needs
yonny yonny
Posts: 7,934
Post #28 27 Apr 2020 13:27
0
In reply to Post #27
My patrol pack's done a few tours of Afghanistan then 6 years with me dragging it through God-knows-what and still as good as the day it was made. Hard as nails.
And ironically they're just about as carpy as you can get.
scaley&dark
Posts: 5,563
Post #29 27 Apr 2020 13:56
0
In reply to Post #26
You would think that in this day and age of many consultants that the basic part of field testing an item like a rucksack, which is designed to go on the back and be carried various distances, would be comfortable to wear and do the job. Gimmicky pockets and loops and things come second.

Cannot really call it a rucksack if it is so pants people cannot wear it and has to go on the barrow.
BTW I've had the TA one, has great ideas on it, but horrible to carry.

An Army patrol pack on the other hand is 👍 great.

fairweather fairweather
Posts: 141
Post #30 27 Apr 2020 14:48
0
In reply to Post #29
i agree with the consensus here, the army / Molle ones are the 'best' you can get at least in terms of build quality and comfort when walking.

I bought a TA one and its going on the bay soon. To correct an earlier point the TA one was designed by Cotswold, though i think the slightly new camfleck one is more of their own work, though is made in China. Had a chat with them at the big one last year.

i'm sure he said they did have plans to bring a slightly larger one out. no doubt the current one is too small.
Are you sure?

This action cannot be undone.

Yes, continue

Loading…