In reply to Post #1674
Note you covered yourself by not saying in what decade π€£π€£π€£π€£
Note you covered yourself by not saying in what decade π€£π€£π€£π€£
This is a painful watch as a Man U fan. Get Tesco off the bench, Dorgu off.
Great playing from Hull though....don't get me started about a man on the posts!
Great playing from Hull though....don't get me started about a man on the posts!
In reply to Post #1676
Mauled by the Tigers π π π π π π π€£
Mauled by the Tigers π π π π π π π€£
The new only fools Christmas special revisited βTo hull & backβ
Carrick you plonker π
Carrick you plonker π
In reply to Post #1676
Not watched the game, Rashford back in the side ffs, that canβt be good for moral for starters ffs
Not watched the game, Rashford back in the side ffs, that canβt be good for moral for starters ffs
De Zerbi spunked the lottery win and will get sacked soon π€£
In reply to Post #1677
The Mrs saw the mailing paws of the Hull fans, can't get it out of her head π
The Mrs saw the mailing paws of the Hull fans, can't get it out of her head π
We do love a late goal against the Geordies.
Point snatched there.
I thought when we were good, we were very good but equally when we were bad we were very bad.
Central Midfielders need to know they are allowed to tackle.
Work to be done.
Point snatched there.
I thought when we were good, we were very good but equally when we were bad we were very bad.
Central Midfielders need to know they are allowed to tackle.
Work to be done.
Well somehow that turned into a convincing win.
I no longer want to see Rashford in a UTD shirt, we donβt donβt need him, sell him. He has had far, far too many opportunities now ffs and we are still playing him, like starting with 10 men!
We got 3 decent strikers last year, Carrick needs to persevere with these, find out what they are all about and then decide who is staying ffs
I no longer want to see Rashford in a UTD shirt, we donβt donβt need him, sell him. He has had far, far too many opportunities now ffs and we are still playing him, like starting with 10 men!
We got 3 decent strikers last year, Carrick needs to persevere with these, find out what they are all about and then decide who is staying ffs
In reply to Post #1683
I only saw the highlights as for the 1st time since the prem began and before I've not renewed Sky Sports (yet). Now TV tried to put my price up stupidly...not paying it π‘
Anyway, Rashy looked o.k on the highlights, I take it they showed his 'best'. Can't believe we started withoug a striker...again...what is he worried about!
Barcola...worth it, or just another prem team having their pants pulled down (at least it's not us for a change π)
I only saw the highlights as for the 1st time since the prem began and before I've not renewed Sky Sports (yet). Now TV tried to put my price up stupidly...not paying it π‘
Anyway, Rashy looked o.k on the highlights, I take it they showed his 'best'. Can't believe we started withoug a striker...again...what is he worried about!
Barcola...worth it, or just another prem team having their pants pulled down (at least it's not us for a change π)
In reply to Post #1684
"Barcola...worth it, or just another prem team having their pants pulled down (at least it's not us for a change π)"
If Anderson is worth Β£116m then yes he is worth it.
Proof will be in the pudding of course but no doubting his ability.
"Barcola...worth it, or just another prem team having their pants pulled down (at least it's not us for a change π)"
If Anderson is worth Β£116m then yes he is worth it.
Proof will be in the pudding of course but no doubting his ability.
In reply to Post #1685
but no doubting his ability
Lots of players have failed to show it coming to the PL though π€ I genuinely hope he does well π
but no doubting his ability
Lots of players have failed to show it coming to the PL though π€ I genuinely hope he does well π
In reply to Post #1684
Its the impact on team moral that concerns me with Rashford, that's after his lack of goal scoring ability. We have persevered with him far too long, said it a long time ago, he is another Welbeck. To be up there we cant carry anyone and we have carried him for a long, long, long time now ffs
Its the impact on team moral that concerns me with Rashford, that's after his lack of goal scoring ability. We have persevered with him far too long, said it a long time ago, he is another Welbeck. To be up there we cant carry anyone and we have carried him for a long, long, long time now ffs
Well, Micheal Oliver WTF!
First half I thought we were very good, second, could have donβt better, hit the bar twice and had a few chances throughout, canβt complain other than βthatβ decision FFS
First half I thought we were very good, second, could have donβt better, hit the bar twice and had a few chances throughout, canβt complain other than βthatβ decision FFS
In reply to Post #1688
How Enzo wasn't interfering with play π
I thought City were there for the taking after Fodens red...should have been a yellow each, and Bruno rolling round on the floor...shame on himπ‘
I thought City played better with 10 men than UTD with 11, neither look on par with Arsenal π...but it's a long season.
Edit, UTD bloody embarrassing last night, reminded me of when Amorin was in charge.
Liverpool looked good tye other night.
How Enzo wasn't interfering with play π
I thought City were there for the taking after Fodens red...should have been a yellow each, and Bruno rolling round on the floor...shame on himπ‘
I thought City played better with 10 men than UTD with 11, neither look on par with Arsenal π...but it's a long season.
Edit, UTD bloody embarrassing last night, reminded me of when Amorin was in charge.
Liverpool looked good tye other night.