So NASA have sent a rocket up into space to see if its possible to deflect an asteroid from its path. Obviously to carry out a test like this wont be cheap at all, and the sceptic in me has just started to wonder, is there possibly more to this than meets the eye???
In reply to Post #1
K.E. = 1/2 m v2
Hopefully it will create more kinetic energy than the asteroid
Let's hope the mathematicians have got their numbers right and they don't push it on a collision course with earth !
K.E. = 1/2 m v2
Hopefully it will create more kinetic energy than the asteroid
Let's hope the mathematicians have got their numbers right and they don't push it on a collision course with earth !
In reply to Post #1
Like what?
Like what?
In reply to Post #2
It's not rocket science is it?
.....
It's not rocket science is it?
.....
In reply to Post #3
They have the worlds most powerful telescopes, so it's not beyond the realms of possibility that they have seen something of interest.
As I eluded to before, this type of test must cost hundreds of millions of dollars, and I doubt they would get the go ahead for that on a whim
They have the worlds most powerful telescopes, so it's not beyond the realms of possibility that they have seen something of interest.
As I eluded to before, this type of test must cost hundreds of millions of dollars, and I doubt they would get the go ahead for that on a whim
In reply to Post #5
Plenty of others can see what the Yanks see so I doubt it.
Hundreds of millions $ is a drop in the ocean, billions are set aside in the US every new term for space related stuff. Plus if you me and the rest of the world know about it then that means its hardly groundbreaking.
The interesting stuff is the things that they've spent billions on so far but joe public wont find out about for another 20 years, Blackbird and Stealth replacements for instance.
Plenty of others can see what the Yanks see so I doubt it.
Hundreds of millions $ is a drop in the ocean, billions are set aside in the US every new term for space related stuff. Plus if you me and the rest of the world know about it then that means its hardly groundbreaking.
The interesting stuff is the things that they've spent billions on so far but joe public wont find out about for another 20 years, Blackbird and Stealth replacements for instance.
We seem to be bombarded recently with stories of near miss asteroids, almost like we are being drip fed info to desensitise us to any future impacts.
I'm convinced they either know there is one on the way and the Dart is up there practicing for it, or it's something more sinister like using them as weapons.
As regards to black project craft? The stealth fighter project started late 70s early 80s which makes it 40 years old. What next leap have they been working on to make them redundant?
I'm convinced they either know there is one on the way and the Dart is up there practicing for it, or it's something more sinister like using them as weapons.
As regards to black project craft? The stealth fighter project started late 70s early 80s which makes it 40 years old. What next leap have they been working on to make them redundant?
In reply to Post #7
The replacements will be flying around now and probably have been for years, no doubt accounting for numerous UFO claims.
The replacements will be flying around now and probably have been for years, no doubt accounting for numerous UFO claims.
Indeed. The majority of the sightings are ours, people just can't comprehend the technology used and assume they are alien. Whether the tech is back engineered or not is open for debate but they have been paying about with antigravity since the end of the war. They've perfected it and they doing it, they won't own up to it of course, they just let people believe its alien to cover up their project. 👽
Would love to see one drop down at an airshow unannounced. What a pisser that would be.
Would love to see one drop down at an airshow unannounced. What a pisser that would be.
In reply to Post #5
I think its due diligence that they are going to see what it takes to knock one off course for future reference.
As said pretty much every major power would probably be able to see one coming at some stage or another. And im sure the American's will want the ability to stop one hitting any of there land or interests.
As for the technology side and what they have up their sleeves - always remember that they spend nearly as much on defence as all the other major superpowers combed per year. And as a rule of thumb most experts would say their classified technology would be around 3 generations in front of what is mainstream now. To put that into perspective look at a 30year old mobile phone compared to one of the latest iphones or Samsungs.
I think its due diligence that they are going to see what it takes to knock one off course for future reference.
As said pretty much every major power would probably be able to see one coming at some stage or another. And im sure the American's will want the ability to stop one hitting any of there land or interests.
As for the technology side and what they have up their sleeves - always remember that they spend nearly as much on defence as all the other major superpowers combed per year. And as a rule of thumb most experts would say their classified technology would be around 3 generations in front of what is mainstream now. To put that into perspective look at a 30year old mobile phone compared to one of the latest iphones or Samsungs.
In reply to Post #9
There is no such thing as antigravity. Manipulation or even amplification of gravity waves might in theory be possible but antigravity is just a made up word. I'd love to think we have that tech but I don't, not for a second. Ultimately the country that first learns to control gravity wins. It opens the door for travelling to any destination at the speed of light with no effect from inertia.
I think this test is just that. To see if the theoretical solution is possible.
There is no such thing as antigravity. Manipulation or even amplification of gravity waves might in theory be possible but antigravity is just a made up word. I'd love to think we have that tech but I don't, not for a second. Ultimately the country that first learns to control gravity wins. It opens the door for travelling to any destination at the speed of light with no effect from inertia.
I think this test is just that. To see if the theoretical solution is possible.
In reply to Post #11
Bob Lazar would disagree
Bob Lazar would disagree
In reply to Post #12
For sure. I'm a big fan of all that stuff and would love to believe they have something but imho if they did, and they'd figured out how to use it, China and Russia would no longer exist as we know them.
For sure. I'm a big fan of all that stuff and would love to believe they have something but imho if they did, and they'd figured out how to use it, China and Russia would no longer exist as we know them.
In reply to Post #13
Yeah I'm in general agreement with you
However I do think the American's do take a stance on not fully showing their hand fully with military technology, particularly in times of relative peace like we have had since the end of cold war.
And that they much prefer to show they are on a par with the other super powers rather then in front of them.
But as you said i don't think they have any "alien technology"
Although what they are up to with the X-37B i am sure would be of great interest.
Yeah I'm in general agreement with you
However I do think the American's do take a stance on not fully showing their hand fully with military technology, particularly in times of relative peace like we have had since the end of cold war.
And that they much prefer to show they are on a par with the other super powers rather then in front of them.
But as you said i don't think they have any "alien technology"
Although what they are up to with the X-37B i am sure would be of great interest.
In reply to Post #14
Absolutely agree they have some pretty special stuff that we don't know about.
Going slightly off topic, we mentioned that the US govt are happy to let peeps think some of their tech is/are UFO's. If you're not already familiar with them, Google UAPTF, specifically the UAPTF Report, and AOIMSG. These are US govt bodies established in the last year or so to study some pretty overwhelming evidence that something is flying around that's not man made.
Does this support the theory that they let peeps think their tech is UFO's or not..... I've no idea. But it's pretty ****ing cool either way.
Absolutely agree they have some pretty special stuff that we don't know about.
Going slightly off topic, we mentioned that the US govt are happy to let peeps think some of their tech is/are UFO's. If you're not already familiar with them, Google UAPTF, specifically the UAPTF Report, and AOIMSG. These are US govt bodies established in the last year or so to study some pretty overwhelming evidence that something is flying around that's not man made.
Does this support the theory that they let peeps think their tech is UFO's or not..... I've no idea. But it's pretty ****ing cool either way.
In reply to Post #15
I understand where your coming from with the term antigravity it may well be used in the wrong manner. However how would you describe the method of propulsion for the TR3B? It doesn't officially exist, just like many of their other projects. It allegedly uses highly pressurised Mercury accelerated by nuclear power to create a plasma that surrounds the craft in a field. Pretty scary stuff and all a bit sci-fi, though evidence for its existence is growing, no smoke without fire.
Where do we stand on the Nimitz Incident? Was it the yanks using black project tech to test there own military exercise, or was it someone else testing them? We automatically assume that the yanks are the big players in all this but we could be wrong, they could all be at it. After all haven't the Chinese just p***** all over Nasa's chips with that nuclear reactor they intend to use for space travel, 100x more powerful yet smaller? Hopefully one day it will all come out. 🤞
I understand where your coming from with the term antigravity it may well be used in the wrong manner. However how would you describe the method of propulsion for the TR3B? It doesn't officially exist, just like many of their other projects. It allegedly uses highly pressurised Mercury accelerated by nuclear power to create a plasma that surrounds the craft in a field. Pretty scary stuff and all a bit sci-fi, though evidence for its existence is growing, no smoke without fire.
Where do we stand on the Nimitz Incident? Was it the yanks using black project tech to test there own military exercise, or was it someone else testing them? We automatically assume that the yanks are the big players in all this but we could be wrong, they could all be at it. After all haven't the Chinese just p***** all over Nasa's chips with that nuclear reactor they intend to use for space travel, 100x more powerful yet smaller? Hopefully one day it will all come out. 🤞
In reply to Post #16
I think the TR3B would be anti gravity - it would overcome the force of gravity with its propulsion system. But that just going off the theory as there is zero known about it publicly at least.
The Nimitz incident is interesting and you have a fair point but its just as likely them testing themselves as it is another super power testing one of its "craft" against the navy's defences as such.
And the china nuclear reactor you refer to is a ion propulsion unit. It not neccesarily more powerful but it more suited to space travel then conventional thrusters.
And im sure the other super powers all have there hands in other pies, Havanna Syndrome as a example of one superpower attacking America in a unknown way. But as said in a earlier post when you spend double what all the opposition do you can play catch up fast when you need to and get out of distance with what you develop first yourself.... a example of that is stealth technology.
I think the TR3B would be anti gravity - it would overcome the force of gravity with its propulsion system. But that just going off the theory as there is zero known about it publicly at least.
The Nimitz incident is interesting and you have a fair point but its just as likely them testing themselves as it is another super power testing one of its "craft" against the navy's defences as such.
And the china nuclear reactor you refer to is a ion propulsion unit. It not neccesarily more powerful but it more suited to space travel then conventional thrusters.
And im sure the other super powers all have there hands in other pies, Havanna Syndrome as a example of one superpower attacking America in a unknown way. But as said in a earlier post when you spend double what all the opposition do you can play catch up fast when you need to and get out of distance with what you develop first yourself.... a example of that is stealth technology.
In reply to Post #16
The Nimitz case is fascinating. There are two crazy interviews with the pilot Dave Fravor, one with Joe Rogan and the other with Lex Fridman. Both completely mind blowing, check them out if you've not seen them.
The TR3B thing is funky but it doesn't add up for me. If it was using some kind of gravity manipulation why would it use the flying wing design previous stealth bombers used? Lift would no longer be relevant.
The Nimitz case is fascinating. There are two crazy interviews with the pilot Dave Fravor, one with Joe Rogan and the other with Lex Fridman. Both completely mind blowing, check them out if you've not seen them.
The TR3B thing is funky but it doesn't add up for me. If it was using some kind of gravity manipulation why would it use the flying wing design previous stealth bombers used? Lift would no longer be relevant.
In reply to Post #15
In the same vane think about this.
Take the year 1900 as the benchmark/starting point.
Pre 1900
Humans had been around for thousands of years up to the year 1900, at this point we were still pretty much getting around on horses, long distance communication was limited, power sources and weapons were equally limited as was just about everything on the planet compared to where mankind is today in 2021.
Remember that's where mankind was in 1900 after THOUSANDS of years.
Post 1900
So now explain how mankind has progressed to where we are today (on the moon, flying drones on Mars, nuclear energy and weapons, mobile phones, jet planes the list is endless)
All this progression in just 121 years!!!!!!! ONE HUNDRED AND TWENTY ONE YEARS versus THOUSANDS!!!
What happened? What changed? Who flicked the switch? and the pace of progression isn't slowing.
Did something or someone pay Earth a visit and flick the switch?
In the same vane think about this.
Take the year 1900 as the benchmark/starting point.
Pre 1900
Humans had been around for thousands of years up to the year 1900, at this point we were still pretty much getting around on horses, long distance communication was limited, power sources and weapons were equally limited as was just about everything on the planet compared to where mankind is today in 2021.
Remember that's where mankind was in 1900 after THOUSANDS of years.
Post 1900
So now explain how mankind has progressed to where we are today (on the moon, flying drones on Mars, nuclear energy and weapons, mobile phones, jet planes the list is endless)
All this progression in just 121 years!!!!!!! ONE HUNDRED AND TWENTY ONE YEARS versus THOUSANDS!!!
What happened? What changed? Who flicked the switch? and the pace of progression isn't slowing.
Did something or someone pay Earth a visit and flick the switch?
In reply to Post #19
It's a good question innit.....
But 3000 years or more ago we built the pyramids apparently.
Have a look at Graham Hancock's cataclysm theory. Really interesting stuff.
It's a good question innit.....
But 3000 years or more ago we built the pyramids apparently.
Have a look at Graham Hancock's cataclysm theory. Really interesting stuff.
In reply to Post #20
When you realize we know nothing about 80% of the world's oceans/seas who knows what's out or down there.
When you realize we know nothing about 80% of the world's oceans/seas who knows what's out or down there.
In reply to Post #1
I'm sure there is a bloody huge space rock going past the earth on 11th of this month........2.5 million away but in NASA terms that's close so perhaps this rocket is going to give it nudge this way so we can stop worrying about Covid and Global warming for a while........
I'm sure there is a bloody huge space rock going past the earth on 11th of this month........2.5 million away but in NASA terms that's close so perhaps this rocket is going to give it nudge this way so we can stop worrying about Covid and Global warming for a while........
In reply to Post #22
lol
lol
Reading ALL pages