|
|
|
|
In reply to Post #900
City were dog Arsenal ruthless
|
|
|
|
On another note, sad to say it, I fancy City for the win later 
Edit - Glad I was wrong 
|
|
|
|
In reply to Post #898
Honestly, what’s the song, things, can only get better…one ****ing day!  
|
|
|
|
In reply to Post #897
🤣🤣🤣 you gotta grin .
|
|
|
|
****ing ****
Had chances ffs, goal threat, zero, pray for a messiah, or £900 million
|
|
|
|
In reply to Post #895
The way they have started playing they could actually win it !!!
|
|
|
|
In reply to Post #894
They should easily finish in the top 4. They are fourth at the moment.
|
|
|
|
In reply to Post #893
Yeah city could well finish in top 4. Money talks again .Be a good match tomorrow
|
|
|
|
A few weeks back I would have relished playing the 115ers but they have had a return to form lately, whereas with our injuries we haven't been as good lately
I'm concerned about tomorrow 
@Slughunter
I don't know, what's the answer.
|
|
|
|
|
Mo Salah running down the wing 😁
|
|
|
|
What do man united and black and white TVs have in common...no prizes for the correct answer... 
|
|
|
|
Well, started with10 again and won, think Amad was well on side.
Zirkee, ****ing clueless both on and off the ball, headless chicken 
|
|
|
|
I'm doing a Ralphy and only come on here because his team lost. 
|
|
|
|
In reply to Post #887
On the basis of the cards given there was another bad tackle later in the game that they didn't show on motd. That wasn't punished.at all
I could also argue that the second wolves second yellow was actually a straight red but it doesn't really matter, the point I'm trying to make is there's so many inconsistencies
|
|
|
|
In reply to Post #886
Saw MOTD last night and thought wrong decision. On SSN just now they showed from another angle and studs showing catching he's achilles if that's the angle ref has seen then i can understand the red. Also thought Gomes was a straight red rather than a 2nd yellow.
When I used to play in the 70s/80s they were standard tacles 
|
|
