CarpForum.co.uk brand mark, a blue stylized fish with a white eye and a smooth modern look, set in the site header against a clean background CarpForum.co.uk wordmark in a bold flowing script style, reading CarpForum.co.uk, displayed in the site header
Menu
Utils
Go Premium Who's Online Members Weather Photo Gallery Articles
Account
Login Register
Full fat Harrison Trebuchets (39 posts / 4,147 views)
TeeCee
Posts: 2,009
Post #1 25 Feb 2021 10:04
0
I'm thinking of getting a set.of 13ft Trebuchets made up. Have any of you on here any experience with them, even better, if you've gone from Lites to the full fat version what is the difference weight wise, casting distance, fish playability?

Many thanks 👍
jeffire jeffire
Posts: 4,442
Post #2 25 Feb 2021 12:44
0
In reply to Post #1
First time i have heard them called that.
allrounder2
Posts: 140
Post #3 25 Feb 2021 15:54
0
In reply to Post #1
i love mine, never had or tried the lites. usually blast 4ozs with them, i dont find them that hard to compress or worry about hook pulls, i think that their reputation puts people off, much better than the FMJs that I have had (in both 12 and 13ft).
TeeCee
Posts: 2,009
Post #4 25 Feb 2021 16:03
0
In reply to Post #2
Full.fat and Semi skimmed 👍
TeeCee
Posts: 2,009
Post #5 25 Feb 2021 16:34
0
In reply to Post #3
Thank you for the reply 👍

It's reassuring to know they're good to play fish on. I didn't think they'd broomsticks, just a slightly beefed up version of the Lites. Got to choose a rod builder now 😁
SUNNYMEAD SUNNYMEAD
Posts: 1,247
Post #6 26 Feb 2021 06:47
0
In reply to Post #5
Would of thought Kev Clayton is a good shout especially as he's the ex Harrison rod builder and of course there's others
Busted
Posts: 1,882
Post #7 26 Feb 2021 12:41
0
In reply to Post #1
Ive never tried the 13ft full treb blank but the 12ft is rubbish imo. Really stiff, really heavy with no real tip to speak of.

Im a fairly decent caster and i found the 12ft treb a real ball buster

I found them to be a lot stiffer than the lites when i had a go with one. If you're able to cast 200yds then go with them, but i could cast over 30 yds further with the 13ft lites than i could with the 12ft full fat. The lites are also ok to play fish on for a casting rods. I wouldn't really want to play a fish on the 12ft full-fat, especially as i use zigs a lot
TeeCee
Posts: 2,009
Post #8 26 Feb 2021 13:20
0
In reply to Post #7
I'm betting the 13ft would be the one .
allrounder2
Posts: 140
Post #9 26 Feb 2021 14:18
0
In reply to Post #8
in my experience 13ft are a little softer, mine are 13ft. the 12ft FMJ was a different animal to the 13ft version.
Jslinn Jslinn
Posts: 2,403
Post #10 26 Feb 2021 18:07
0
13' all the way pure mechanics. The original Harrison distance rods where the balister 3.75 13' I think mine are 3.5lb version and they are decent (probably better than my Torrix 3.25 12'), is say that as they are heavier and a thicker blank and 25 yo.
biggsyhaulin biggsyhaulin
Posts: 1,667
Post #11 26 Feb 2021 18:08
0
In reply to Post #7
Yes,the 12s are ball busters🤣
Had s set couple years back!now using aviators 12.6 plus.......proper rods lmo 👍😎
Glenn_B Glenn_B
Posts: 1,804
Post #12 27 Feb 2021 08:57
0
In reply to Post #5
The original Trebs were out quite a while before the Lites made an appearance😎
Goose Goose
Posts: 12,901
Post #13 27 Feb 2021 11:06
0
In reply to Post #12
And the lites came about as the full fats are to much for most anglers even in 13ft flavour to get the best out of as it is really designed for tournament casting.
bluebeat13
Posts: 2,168
Post #14 27 Feb 2021 11:35
0
Where are you based? If I was going to spend £400 on a tool like a Trebuchet I would want to have at least a few chucks with one. In my opinion these are a tool to do a job rather than a fishing rod so best to be sure for yourself that it's what you need.
TeeCee
Posts: 2,009
Post #15 27 Feb 2021 12:24
0
In reply to Post #14
You got one I can have a go on then?

Are you sure?

This action cannot be undone.

Yes, continue

Loading…