CarpForum.co.uk brand mark, a blue stylized fish with a white eye and a smooth modern look, set in the site header against a clean background CarpForum.co.uk wordmark in a bold flowing script style, reading CarpForum.co.uk, displayed in the site header
Menu
Utils
Go Premium Who's Online Members Weather Photo Gallery Articles
Account
Login Register
Powapacs atom dvb tv (8 posts / 1,769 views)
donkeypunch donkeypunch
Posts: 1,154
Post #1 30 Apr 2020 17:01
0
Does anyone use the powapacs tv? Just after some feedback.....I normally use my iPad and a freeview thingy but I'm wondering if the tv is less power hungry?

Also....is the 60w solar panel worth the extra?

Cheers
roman
Posts: 4,847
Post #2 30 Apr 2020 17:41
0
In reply to Post #1
I bought one for winter, and using the extra optional powered Ariel they sell, I haven't struggled for a picture, Cambs area. The inbuilt battery Inside the TV I probably get 2hrs, then I just switch too my vault through the 12volt cigarette adapter. Which i think would run for quite a few hours. Can't say how long.
Old-Cornishman
Posts: 688
Post #3 30 Apr 2020 18:58
0
In reply to Post #1
Might depend a bit on what IPad you have, but my apple uses about 3W and runs for about 8 to 10 hours on its internal battery.
Just had a look at the tv spec and it say under 20W. Probably not much under 20, otherwise they would have said.
Looks like the tv uses about 6 times the power needed for an apple iPad.
donkeypunch donkeypunch
Posts: 1,154
Post #4 30 Apr 2020 21:00
0
In reply to Post #3
It's an iPad air2 that I mainly take fishing, might be better off sticking with that then.


Have you got any experience with the solar panels?
Old-Cornishman
Posts: 688
Post #5 30 Apr 2020 22:13
0
In reply to Post #4
My solar panel experience is only of larger units but the same principles would apply.
Panels do vary a bit but generally you will need high sunlight intensity ( spring and summer) and a good panel angle ( 90 deg to the sun) to achieve rated output. Also cleanliness and the panel age will also have a small but significant effect.
I'm a big fan of solar panels but just remember that the rated output will rarely be achieved, so if you can, go bigger than you think you might need.
donkeypunch donkeypunch
Posts: 1,154
Post #6 1 May 2020 09:14
0
In reply to Post #5
Cheers, just looking a the RidgeMonkey panel vs the small powapacs version there's 20w difference, to be honest I'm struggling to get my head round watts, mah etc as it is
Old-Cornishman
Posts: 688
Post #7 1 May 2020 15:48
0
In reply to Post #6
If you do any calculations it's easiest to work in W h
In my opinion m ah is nothing more than marketing hype to make the power packs seem bigger.
Divide m ah by 1000 to get Amp h then multiply by specified voltage to give you capacity in Whrs

Without knowing specifics it's difficult to advise but hopefully a sample calculation might help.
To make an educated guess we would need to know the following.
What capacity power pac you have. Perhaps 240Wh?
Usage time per day and power needed for items such as iPad. Phone ,light etc
iPad 10hrs @ 3W so 30Wh /day
Phone charger typically 5Wh / day
Light 5W for say 6 hrs / day so 30Wh/ day
Total energy required would be 65Wh/ day so your 240Wh power pack
would be empty in 3.6 days.

A 40 W panel might only produce 5 W for say 3 hours in weak winter sunlight so 15Wh produced in winter
Giving you a shortfall of 50Wh.
Your 240Wh power pack would then last 240 divided by 50 so 4.8 days
The same 40W panel might produce 30W for 5 hours in summer so 150Wh which would more than cover your 65Wh usage
Hopefully that might help but PM me if you wish.
donkeypunch donkeypunch
Posts: 1,154
Post #8 2 May 2020 01:17
0
In reply to Post #7
Thanks, you may well be getting a PM in the near future 🤔
Are you sure?

This action cannot be undone.

Yes, continue

Loading…