A couple of my waters have pretty long walks from the car park through boggy ground and to be honest I lot of the time I can't be arsed to barrow round the other side.
At the minute I have my gear in bags on the barrow and nothing on my back. I'm considering doing away with the carryall and switching over to a small rucksack, the thinking being if the barrow is lighter it will be easier to push. However I will then have the weight on my back which I don't now. Just wondering whether you guys think they'd be any benefit to doing this or will I gain with one but loose with the other? And still end up not walking right round. Funds don't run to a power porter at the min and my barrow is so old it wouldn't be worth an aftermarket motor add on.
At the minute I have my gear in bags on the barrow and nothing on my back. I'm considering doing away with the carryall and switching over to a small rucksack, the thinking being if the barrow is lighter it will be easier to push. However I will then have the weight on my back which I don't now. Just wondering whether you guys think they'd be any benefit to doing this or will I gain with one but loose with the other? And still end up not walking right round. Funds don't run to a power porter at the min and my barrow is so old it wouldn't be worth an aftermarket motor add on.
In reply to Post #1
I whack as much as I can on my back with a small rucksack (British Army Patrol Pack 30L). It's miles easier to carry on your back than push through the mud imo. My barrow is heavy enough just with the rods, brolly, food and bait on it.
I whack as much as I can on my back with a small rucksack (British Army Patrol Pack 30L). It's miles easier to carry on your back than push through the mud imo. My barrow is heavy enough just with the rods, brolly, food and bait on it.
In reply to Post #1
Rucksack Wayne. May make you offload the tons of unnecessary gear you normally lug round!
Rucksack Wayne. May make you offload the tons of unnecessary gear you normally lug round!
I have an Army Bergen, which I can put on the barrow or lug on my back. In winter some of the paths round my lake are a 'mare, muddy, rutted and sloping, which send a heavily loaded barrow all directions.
My barrow then gets loaded up with bedchair, rod holdall, water and tackle box, no more, with rucksack on my back.
If the path is smooth enough, then the rucksack goes on the barrow.
My barrow then gets loaded up with bedchair, rod holdall, water and tackle box, no more, with rucksack on my back.
If the path is smooth enough, then the rucksack goes on the barrow.
I used to use two large carry alls for the syndicate lake where i could park right behind every peg, sheer luxury.
Then when i went trotting off to fish oxfordshire waters i used the two carryalls on a barrow, dead easy.
Now im fishing short sesh small carp waters or barbel fishing its a small rucky.
Then when i went trotting off to fish oxfordshire waters i used the two carryalls on a barrow, dead easy.
Now im fishing short sesh small carp waters or barbel fishing its a small rucky.
In reply to Post #4
I used to do as Josh mentioned, in fact I added a shelf to the front of my barrow made out of ply, Its a great solution on firm ground and as josh says, if you get it just right in terms of spreading the load it becomes really easy to push around.
However, this wont work with boggy ground. One of my favorite waters has areas you just have to get through and if you tried to push a loaded barrow through it, itd sink up to the axle of the wheel. I dont think even a power porter would deal with that. There's a fella I often see at one of the marks I fish on the SE coast, and he has a trolly with really fat wheels - wider than a ball if you know what I mean, and that can get over shingle or dry sand - surprised there isnt anything similar for a carp barrow. Perhaps have a google for that sea angling trolly as an alternative to a barrow for getting over boggy ground ?
I use a ruck sack as well, to take some of the weight off the barrow - and as mentioned, this does tend to focus the mind to cutting back to what you need instead of what you might need. For me the most awkward thing to carry is my bedchair. My rods go on my back too - mine are in a 3 rods sleeve. I can also strap my tempest brolly to either my rod sleeve or my rucksack. Before I used the 3 rod sleeve I used a quiver, and my stripped back m3 could go in the quivver too.
I used to do as Josh mentioned, in fact I added a shelf to the front of my barrow made out of ply, Its a great solution on firm ground and as josh says, if you get it just right in terms of spreading the load it becomes really easy to push around.
However, this wont work with boggy ground. One of my favorite waters has areas you just have to get through and if you tried to push a loaded barrow through it, itd sink up to the axle of the wheel. I dont think even a power porter would deal with that. There's a fella I often see at one of the marks I fish on the SE coast, and he has a trolly with really fat wheels - wider than a ball if you know what I mean, and that can get over shingle or dry sand - surprised there isnt anything similar for a carp barrow. Perhaps have a google for that sea angling trolly as an alternative to a barrow for getting over boggy ground ?
I use a ruck sack as well, to take some of the weight off the barrow - and as mentioned, this does tend to focus the mind to cutting back to what you need instead of what you might need. For me the most awkward thing to carry is my bedchair. My rods go on my back too - mine are in a 3 rods sleeve. I can also strap my tempest brolly to either my rod sleeve or my rucksack. Before I used the 3 rod sleeve I used a quiver, and my stripped back m3 could go in the quivver too.
British Army Berghaus rucksack.
I've never owned a barrow, still carry my gear, sometimes it takes two trips.
I'll continue carrying as long as my body allows.
I've never owned a barrow, still carry my gear, sometimes it takes two trips.
I'll continue carrying as long as my body allows.
In reply to Post #1
Used to hate my rucksack then i scaled down to 40l one and now I love it
Used to hate my rucksack then i scaled down to 40l one and now I love it
In reply to Post #1
I used to pile everything on the barrow, I'm a short arse and always struggled, so this year I bought an Avid Ruck bag, thinned my gear down by getting rid of those large Fox F boxes for the Tackle safe and RM Action station, so much easier on my back, and now even better as generally now only use the Nash Scopes, life is so much easier
I used to pile everything on the barrow, I'm a short arse and always struggled, so this year I bought an Avid Ruck bag, thinned my gear down by getting rid of those large Fox F boxes for the Tackle safe and RM Action station, so much easier on my back, and now even better as generally now only use the Nash Scopes, life is so much easier
In reply to Post #11
It's the 9foot ones you have? Still tempted by a set of 10foot ones.
It's the 9foot ones you have? Still tempted by a set of 10foot ones.
In reply to Post #12
Yeah 9' one's and spod, they even fit sideways in my car, along with my Titan TC Pro, so much easier to load as well, means I can get the barrow out first
Yeah 9' one's and spod, they even fit sideways in my car, along with my Titan TC Pro, so much easier to load as well, means I can get the barrow out first
In reply to Post #9
No such thing? Bergen maybe?
No such thing? Bergen maybe?
In reply to Post #14
Nope! British Army Berghaus rucksack. I've been carrying it around (the world) for the past twenty years, cannot break the thing.
Google it
Nope! British Army Berghaus rucksack. I've been carrying it around (the world) for the past twenty years, cannot break the thing.
Google it
In reply to Post #15
Hmmmm.
I would be interested to see a photo of this as it would be a vary rare beast indeed. Is it DPM or Green?
Whilst Berghaus produce a range of "military" rucksacks which have been privately purchased by soldiers and Royal Marines for decades, the name on the label inside British Army Bergens is not Berghaus but ISS, a defence contractor.
The army Bergen was based on the Crusader and the Karrimor Sabre, but with many features removed to save costs, a simplified harness and frame added and no padded hip belt, just a webbing strap. More significant was a reduction in length to allow the rucksack to be worn with the then new PLCE webbing system. The shorted sack sits on top of the webbing pouches, hence the removal of the padded waist belt.
I am genuinely intrigued to see your rucksack as if it is marked Berghaus, it may be a prototype for the current issue Bergen and very rare!
Hmmmm.
I would be interested to see a photo of this as it would be a vary rare beast indeed. Is it DPM or Green?
Whilst Berghaus produce a range of "military" rucksacks which have been privately purchased by soldiers and Royal Marines for decades, the name on the label inside British Army Bergens is not Berghaus but ISS, a defence contractor.
The army Bergen was based on the Crusader and the Karrimor Sabre, but with many features removed to save costs, a simplified harness and frame added and no padded hip belt, just a webbing strap. More significant was a reduction in length to allow the rucksack to be worn with the then new PLCE webbing system. The shorted sack sits on top of the webbing pouches, hence the removal of the padded waist belt.
I am genuinely intrigued to see your rucksack as if it is marked Berghaus, it may be a prototype for the current issue Bergen and very rare!