In reply to Post #44
You did say thinner, then immediately mention freezing the liquids, not unreasonable to assume you're talking about an alternative method of delivering the liquids you previously mentioned.
However your follow up zig comment makes me think you either don't know what you're talking about, or joking
You did say thinner, then immediately mention freezing the liquids, not unreasonable to assume you're talking about an alternative method of delivering the liquids you previously mentioned.
However your follow up zig comment makes me think you either don't know what you're talking about, or joking
In reply to Post #46
On that logic you'd also assume I was using groats and neat liquid in the spod device wouldnt you? Because of the full stop and line break meaning nothing. For a self declared intelligent guy, you clearly don't know basic English text structure which is hilarious tbh.
If you don't want to miss out on the next biggest edge then up to you
On that logic you'd also assume I was using groats and neat liquid in the spod device wouldnt you? Because of the full stop and line break meaning nothing. For a self declared intelligent guy, you clearly don't know basic English text structure which is hilarious tbh.
If you don't want to miss out on the next biggest edge then up to you
In reply to Post #39
Just a solid walled spod.
Just a solid walled spod.
In reply to Post #45
mollases cubes...
mollases cubes...
In reply to Post #47
Sorry but thats just rubbish.
you stated than the thinner liquids couldn't be spodded then offered an alternative method. I've never claimed to be a master linguist.
Sorry but thats just rubbish.
you stated than the thinner liquids couldn't be spodded then offered an alternative method. I've never claimed to be a master linguist.
In reply to Post #50
No I didn't. I said it doesn't really work well with thinner liquids. I then offered another method not linked to any viscosity of liquid, not an alternative for thinner liquids. Just as spodding neat liquid wasn't an alternative to using groats as a carrier, it was just another method.
I know you find it hard to admit your wrong, but you were, very clearly wrong. I don't expect you to hold your hands up, it's not in your personality to do it as evidence widely on the forum. I'm literally telling you how it was written, because I wrote it, so I would know. You, having read it, without using basic English, cannot tell the author what they were saying
Even your self importance can't stretch that far can it? 
No I didn't. I said it doesn't really work well with thinner liquids. I then offered another method not linked to any viscosity of liquid, not an alternative for thinner liquids. Just as spodding neat liquid wasn't an alternative to using groats as a carrier, it was just another method.
I know you find it hard to admit your wrong, but you were, very clearly wrong. I don't expect you to hold your hands up, it's not in your personality to do it as evidence widely on the forum. I'm literally telling you how it was written, because I wrote it, so I would know. You, having read it, without using basic English, cannot tell the author what they were saying
Even your self importance can't stretch that far can it?
In reply to Post #51
Great nickname
Great nickname
In reply to Post #51
Fairly sure you've edited that lol
I don't think you're out to do anything other than start arguments, you offered a different delivery method after stating one wasn't appropriate for thinner liquids. Most would see that as offering an alternative. Now wind it 😆
Fairly sure you've edited that lol
I don't think you're out to do anything other than start arguments, you offered a different delivery method after stating one wasn't appropriate for thinner liquids. Most would see that as offering an alternative. Now wind it 😆
In reply to Post #53
Haven't edited anything. I knew you'd try claim that one though as you're so up yourself, ask a mod if you're so sure it was. It'll be hilarious to see you put in your place once again.
It's funny how what you think isn't correct but you can't accept it and will try and claim anything to not be wrong. Well you were. Obviously.
Only one out here for arguments is you. I told you that you were wrong in your post and instead of saying okay and leaving it your out here trying to be right when you're just not.
Also, don't tell me what to do, who do you think you are?? Wait, you think you're someone special with your self importance. Sorry to have to tell you this, you aint, you're a clapped out pillock who thinks spouting copy and paste from scientific papers makes them special. You don't know better than everyone else, you clearly know a lot less. Crawl back to your hole, the real world seems to be too much for you to handle.
Haven't edited anything. I knew you'd try claim that one though as you're so up yourself, ask a mod if you're so sure it was. It'll be hilarious to see you put in your place once again.
It's funny how what you think isn't correct but you can't accept it and will try and claim anything to not be wrong. Well you were. Obviously.
Only one out here for arguments is you. I told you that you were wrong in your post and instead of saying okay and leaving it your out here trying to be right when you're just not.
Also, don't tell me what to do, who do you think you are?? Wait, you think you're someone special with your self importance. Sorry to have to tell you this, you aint, you're a clapped out pillock who thinks spouting copy and paste from scientific papers makes them special. You don't know better than everyone else, you clearly know a lot less. Crawl back to your hole, the real world seems to be too much for you to handle.
Mark Holmes uses Golden syrup to spomb liquids to his spots....
In reply to Post #54
IF I was copy and pasting from science papers you could copy what I post and reverse search it.
The fact that the information stays with me after reading it and adding it to memory? Im sorry should I forget things after reading?
Ask anyone who's used my bait, they can assure you I know what I'm doing.
I do wonder where your Agressive streak comes from, its not at all unreasonable for someone to see you finish one paragraph with the assertion you cannot spod thinner liquids out, and starting the next one with freezing liquids, to be related.
IF I was copy and pasting from science papers you could copy what I post and reverse search it.
The fact that the information stays with me after reading it and adding it to memory? Im sorry should I forget things after reading?
Ask anyone who's used my bait, they can assure you I know what I'm doing.
I do wonder where your Agressive streak comes from, its not at all unreasonable for someone to see you finish one paragraph with the assertion you cannot spod thinner liquids out, and starting the next one with freezing liquids, to be related.
In reply to Post #56
Honestly you are like all the pop up idiots that join all the forums that allow such Muppets... Get a grip and make your bait better not spout rubbish about others on a public forum. Makes us look no better than match fishermen and why should anyone get peg 13 in a match????
Honestly you are like all the pop up idiots that join all the forums that allow such Muppets... Get a grip and make your bait better not spout rubbish about others on a public forum. Makes us look no better than match fishermen and why should anyone get peg 13 in a match????
In reply to Post #57
Says you lol. you only ever come on the forum to troll.
you've no experience of my wares.
Says you lol. you only ever come on the forum to troll.
you've no experience of my wares.
In reply to Post #56
You literally said that I said to freeze thinner liquids when I didn't. I corrected you and you couldn't accept it. When you're telling someone they're wrong when they aren't I'm pretty sure they won't be happy about it. Bit like you getting all defensive when I've called you out for being a copy and paste merchant (fyi reading the abstract doesn't mean you really know anything about paper, you've got to read the entire thing and even then it's still subjective)
Why don't you “wind it in” and F off. You were wrong in what you said, you were corrected on it, if only you'd been man enough to acknowledge that but you couldn't. Really shows your mentality doesn't it. Not sure why you think you can tell people what to do and not expect an earful either
You literally said that I said to freeze thinner liquids when I didn't. I corrected you and you couldn't accept it. When you're telling someone they're wrong when they aren't I'm pretty sure they won't be happy about it. Bit like you getting all defensive when I've called you out for being a copy and paste merchant (fyi reading the abstract doesn't mean you really know anything about paper, you've got to read the entire thing and even then it's still subjective)
Why don't you “wind it in” and F off. You were wrong in what you said, you were corrected on it, if only you'd been man enough to acknowledge that but you couldn't. Really shows your mentality doesn't it. Not sure why you think you can tell people what to do and not expect an earful either
In reply to Post #59
You really are an @rse. You have no idea how much time I dedicate to research.
You made a stupid post about ice cubes right after excluding spombing as viable for thinner liquids, anyone would suggest the two were connected.
You called me out as a copy and paste merchant with no evidence, no reverse search on anything I've written etc. its sad really.
Anyhow, at work, so talk to someone else (Y)
You really are an @rse. You have no idea how much time I dedicate to research.
You made a stupid post about ice cubes right after excluding spombing as viable for thinner liquids, anyone would suggest the two were connected.
You called me out as a copy and paste merchant with no evidence, no reverse search on anything I've written etc. its sad really.
Anyhow, at work, so talk to someone else (Y)