In reply to Post #64
Same. Imagine if you could correct someone and they'd accept they were wrong.

In reply to Post #62
Lad, I told you your assumption was wrong. You couldn't accept that. Which is where this all stems from.

You said I said something I didn't say, you put 2 and 2 together and got 639. I corrected you and you told me I was wrong
Had you held you hands up and owned your mistake it'd have been done and dusted, but you didn't did you. You refused to believe you could be wrong and made it something it never had to be. You then tried to tell me what to do like you have some sort of authority? It'll never go down well with anyone. Let alone when it's some numpty with a bait firm that just slags off everyone else that sells more than him

I'm not the first person on here you've rubbed up the wrong way because you can't handle being wrong or challenged am I. Your mentality and personality shines through that fragile ego and we can all see you for who you are.

In reply to Post #60
Not enough because you read an article and take it as gospel clearly.

Why was it stupid? I never said they'd sink, you assumed I said that because you didn't read it properly. Same as you assumed I was on about thin liquids wrongly too. Not my fault you were wrong and can't cope with me calling you out on that is it. You're the one with a fragile ego that cries when they're wrong instead of owning it and holding your hands up to it.

I'll cal you a copy and paste merchant till the cows come home. Whether I'm right or wrong. Because it's exactly what you're doing to me and what I posted. You don't like it happening to you but you're happy to do it to others. Again, shows your mentality doesn't it, pathetic.

Once again, trying to tell others what to do like you're some kind of relevant to them. Get a grip, you're a nobody and that'll never change.

In reply to Post #56
You literally said that I said to freeze thinner liquids when I didn't. I corrected you and you couldn't accept it. When you're telling someone they're wrong when they aren't I'm pretty sure they won't be happy about it. Bit like you getting all defensive when I've called you out for being a copy and paste merchant (fyi reading the abstract doesn't mean you really know anything about paper, you've got to read the entire thing and even then it's still subjective)

Why don't you “wind it in” and F off. You were wrong in what you said, you were corrected on it, if only you'd been man enough to acknowledge that but you couldn't. Really shows your mentality doesn't it. Not sure why you think you can tell people what to do and not expect an earful either

In reply to Post #53
Haven't edited anything. I knew you'd try claim that one though as you're so up yourself, ask a mod if you're so sure it was. It'll be hilarious to see you put in your place once again.
It's funny how what you think isn't correct but you can't accept it and will try and claim anything to not be wrong. Well you were. Obviously.
Only one out here for arguments is you. I told you that you were wrong in your post and instead of saying okay and leaving it your out here trying to be right when you're just not.

Also, don't tell me what to do, who do you think you are?? Wait, you think you're someone special with your self importance. Sorry to have to tell you this, you aint, you're a clapped out pillock who thinks spouting copy and paste from scientific papers makes them special. You don't know better than everyone else, you clearly know a lot less. Crawl back to your hole, the real world seems to be too much for you to handle.

AA baits are fairly decent

In reply to Post #50
No I didn't. I said it doesn't really work well with thinner liquids. I then offered another method not linked to any viscosity of liquid, not an alternative for thinner liquids. Just as spodding neat liquid wasn't an alternative to using groats as a carrier, it was just another method.

I know you find it hard to admit your wrong, but you were, very clearly wrong. I don't expect you to hold your hands up, it's not in your personality to do it as evidence widely on the forum. I'm literally telling you how it was written, because I wrote it, so I would know. You, having read it, without using basic English, cannot tell the author what they were saying Even your self importance can't stretch that far can it?

In reply to Post #46
On that logic you'd also assume I was using groats and neat liquid in the spod device wouldnt you? Because of the full stop and line break meaning nothing. For a self declared intelligent guy, you clearly don't know basic English text structure which is hilarious tbh.

If you don't want to miss out on the next biggest edge then up to you

In reply to Post #41
Have you never drifted frozen liquids over your swim when zig fishing?

I thought it was a given they'd float? It's ice after all. The leakage happens from top downwards. Thicker the liquid the lower in the water column the attraction will sink. Obviously not great on windy days.

In reply to Post #42
No I didn't. Learn to read