I've had a pair of bushnell 10 x 50 for more years than I can remember. Yes they are bulky ,but when light levels drop you can see with them when you can't with the naked eye.

Maybe I should consider 8 x 42 then instead of 8 x 32

In reply to Post #17
I would

In reply to Post #17
the formula is you divide the end lens by the magnification the higher the number the better as it the brighter the image
so for instance 8 x 32 would give you 4 a
nd 8 x 42 would give you 5.25 a bigger number a brighter image that would be noticeable in low light conditions
my 55 years old Russian 7 x 50 are 7 !!!! thats why you can see things in near darkness

I understand the logic but doesn't the higher you go up the heavier and more difficult it is to keep the Binoculars image still? I guess I'm looking for as lightweight and compact as possible without breaking the bank

In reply to Post #21
its the higher magnification!
this affects the field of view and the higher you go the harder it is to keep still on the target thats why 8 x is about the optimum the bigger diameter end lenses just let more light in

Perfect..... I think I'll opt for an 8 X 42 set..... thanks all for the advice and comments.... Super helpful

In reply to Post #23
Bushnell h20 8x42 are very good

In reply to Post #1
I find 8x42 best for fishing use.

I've got the Bushnell H2O in this size and find them great.

Bushnell H2O and the Hawke Nature Trek are the two I have shortlisted..... Thanks