In reply to Post #15
Because something in carp fishing is dearer doesn't make it better I leant that years ago anyway each to there own
Because something in carp fishing is dearer doesn't make it better I leant that years ago anyway each to there own
In reply to Post #9
I still have one of the first aqua 60" brollies made from aquatex well over 10 years old still excellent a union jack m3 aquatex which is still excellent and a trakker tempest air (aquatex) which i have had no issues with.
The only brolly i did have an issue with was an aqua 60" made from nylon that was ruined after being put away wet the material all came away on the inside which also happened to my first aqua nylon winter skin which then leaked however my original aqua nylon dillo from around 2002 is still going strong, this has been left in a friends garage for years used 3 or 4 times a year on my french trips
I still have one of the first aqua 60" brollies made from aquatex well over 10 years old still excellent a union jack m3 aquatex which is still excellent and a trakker tempest air (aquatex) which i have had no issues with.
The only brolly i did have an issue with was an aqua 60" made from nylon that was ruined after being put away wet the material all came away on the inside which also happened to my first aqua nylon winter skin which then leaked however my original aqua nylon dillo from around 2002 is still going strong, this has been left in a friends garage for years used 3 or 4 times a year on my french trips
In reply to Post #6
well the original Wychwood MHR and the Compact 50" were made of a ripstop material and had a 5 year warrantee they were imo the best brollys around
sadly its replacement the Mk2 is a lottery brolly loads of them leaked and Wychwood stopped the 5 year warrantee but if you got a good one they are great
as far as comparing the Solar Undercover with them Size wise its in between the 2 original Wychwood MHRs Dimensions W264cm x 150cm x 150cm - Weight: 7kg
the material is 10,000 HH and keeping the weight to 7.4kg all inc is a very decent top quality Nylon its certainly not flimsy in the least IMO possibly the best material of this type I have seen
I cant see it ever leaking I like it a lot !!!!
the main points I like is the height 150cm the weight only 7kg inc the size great footprint the bedchair can go right to the back so the 150cn deep is not an issue but a huge plus in tight swims
rear vents complete easy zip off front
to me its perfect
Oh yea and Im loving the look of the NEW SP SPIDER COMPACT with the Cam-Loc frame system a winner on uneven ground can see it kicking the arse of the hides and tempest they just need a scull cap for it
well the original Wychwood MHR and the Compact 50" were made of a ripstop material and had a 5 year warrantee they were imo the best brollys around
sadly its replacement the Mk2 is a lottery brolly loads of them leaked and Wychwood stopped the 5 year warrantee but if you got a good one they are great
as far as comparing the Solar Undercover with them Size wise its in between the 2 original Wychwood MHRs Dimensions W264cm x 150cm x 150cm - Weight: 7kg
the material is 10,000 HH and keeping the weight to 7.4kg all inc is a very decent top quality Nylon its certainly not flimsy in the least IMO possibly the best material of this type I have seen
I cant see it ever leaking I like it a lot !!!!
the main points I like is the height 150cm the weight only 7kg inc the size great footprint the bedchair can go right to the back so the 150cn deep is not an issue but a huge plus in tight swims
rear vents complete easy zip off front
to me its perfect
Oh yea and Im loving the look of the NEW SP SPIDER COMPACT with the Cam-Loc frame system a winner on uneven ground can see it kicking the arse of the hides and tempest they just need a scull cap for it
In reply to Post #12
I'm a nylon fan too, but the Aquatexx fans get a bit emotional if you knock it. Lighter weight, tougher, dries quicker, not as dark in daylight and cheaper.
I'm a nylon fan too, but the Aquatexx fans get a bit emotional if you knock it. Lighter weight, tougher, dries quicker, not as dark in daylight and cheaper.
Hardly "New" been out since middle of last year
In reply to Post #20
wonder WHY SOLAR SAYS ON THEIR WEBSITE THE NEW SP COMPACT
and as its completely different to the previous model when does it stop being the new model ???
and as its completely different to the previous model when does it stop being the new model ???
In reply to Post #21
If you are talking about the SP Spider Compact it's not new Gerry. It was launched last April. Looks like Solar have re-launched the same item saying it's ‘NEW' and putting the price up. Almost certain it was under £300 RRP last year.
Check out the date on the YouTube videos. There were also threads on here discussing it.
If you are talking about the SP Spider Compact it's not new Gerry. It was launched last April. Looks like Solar have re-launched the same item saying it's ‘NEW' and putting the price up. Almost certain it was under £300 RRP last year.
Check out the date on the YouTube videos. There were also threads on here discussing it.
and as its completely different to the previous model when does it stop being the new model ??? Are Solar wrong in STATING the New on their website then ?
In reply to Post #23
Give it up
Watch the Solar video from last April on YouTube. It's exactly the same. In fact if you launch the ‘NEW' video on the solar website in YouTube it links you to the same video from last April.
Give it up
Watch the Solar video from last April on YouTube. It's exactly the same. In fact if you launch the ‘NEW' video on the solar website in YouTube it links you to the same video from last April.
In reply to Post #24
I am NOT SAYING in April the video wasnt posted ? with different weights and different dimensions !
I AM simply quoting the Solar website
dont shoot the messenger
I think its totally irrelevant unless a Newer model come out just NIT PICKING
I am NOT SAYING in April the video wasnt posted ? with different weights and different dimensions !
I AM simply quoting the Solar website
dont shoot the messenger
In reply to Post #25
It's only a bivvy, all is well that ends well.
I actually nearly bought one of these last year to replace my old Tempest Brolly. Went for the 100T in the end but the solar looks decent.
It's only a bivvy, all is well that ends well.
I actually nearly bought one of these last year to replace my old Tempest Brolly. Went for the 100T in the end but the solar looks decent.
I barely trust camlocks on banksticks let alone legs on a bivvy.......
In reply to Post #27
Agree Wayne some are proper gash had many a pram hood bivvy with tensioning poles and more than useless cam locks Avid Tardis was about the worst I came across about as much use as a chocolate fireguard.
Agree Wayne some are proper gash had many a pram hood bivvy with tensioning poles and more than useless cam locks Avid Tardis was about the worst I came across about as much use as a chocolate fireguard.
In reply to Post #28
I agree korum ones are terrible
I agree korum ones are terrible
In reply to Post #27
got one of the bivvys last year and to me it seems like they really have put a thougt into it really easy to put up an seems prettty sturdy to me .way better than the sonik axs that i had before. i only had it out for 4 nights before winter hit us up here in sweden but it seems to be really well made.
got one of the bivvys last year and to me it seems like they really have put a thougt into it really easy to put up an seems prettty sturdy to me .way better than the sonik axs that i had before. i only had it out for 4 nights before winter hit us up here in sweden but it seems to be really well made.