In reply to Post #15
I understand where your coming from with the term antigravity it may well be used in the wrong manner. However how would you describe the method of propulsion for the TR3B? It doesn't officially exist, just like many of their other projects. It allegedly uses highly pressurised Mercury accelerated by nuclear power to create a plasma that surrounds the craft in a field. Pretty scary stuff and all a bit sci-fi, though evidence for its existence is growing, no smoke without fire.
Where do we stand on the Nimitz Incident? Was it the yanks using black project tech to test there own military exercise, or was it someone else testing them? We automatically assume that the yanks are the big players in all this but we could be wrong, they could all be at it. After all haven't the Chinese just p***** all over Nasa's chips with that nuclear reactor they intend to use for space travel, 100x more powerful yet smaller? Hopefully one day it will all come out. 🤞
I understand where your coming from with the term antigravity it may well be used in the wrong manner. However how would you describe the method of propulsion for the TR3B? It doesn't officially exist, just like many of their other projects. It allegedly uses highly pressurised Mercury accelerated by nuclear power to create a plasma that surrounds the craft in a field. Pretty scary stuff and all a bit sci-fi, though evidence for its existence is growing, no smoke without fire.
Where do we stand on the Nimitz Incident? Was it the yanks using black project tech to test there own military exercise, or was it someone else testing them? We automatically assume that the yanks are the big players in all this but we could be wrong, they could all be at it. After all haven't the Chinese just p***** all over Nasa's chips with that nuclear reactor they intend to use for space travel, 100x more powerful yet smaller? Hopefully one day it will all come out. 🤞
In reply to Post #16
I think the TR3B would be anti gravity - it would overcome the force of gravity with its propulsion system. But that just going off the theory as there is zero known about it publicly at least.
The Nimitz incident is interesting and you have a fair point but its just as likely them testing themselves as it is another super power testing one of its "craft" against the navy's defences as such.
And the china nuclear reactor you refer to is a ion propulsion unit. It not neccesarily more powerful but it more suited to space travel then conventional thrusters.
And im sure the other super powers all have there hands in other pies, Havanna Syndrome as a example of one superpower attacking America in a unknown way. But as said in a earlier post when you spend double what all the opposition do you can play catch up fast when you need to and get out of distance with what you develop first yourself.... a example of that is stealth technology.
I think the TR3B would be anti gravity - it would overcome the force of gravity with its propulsion system. But that just going off the theory as there is zero known about it publicly at least.
The Nimitz incident is interesting and you have a fair point but its just as likely them testing themselves as it is another super power testing one of its "craft" against the navy's defences as such.
And the china nuclear reactor you refer to is a ion propulsion unit. It not neccesarily more powerful but it more suited to space travel then conventional thrusters.
And im sure the other super powers all have there hands in other pies, Havanna Syndrome as a example of one superpower attacking America in a unknown way. But as said in a earlier post when you spend double what all the opposition do you can play catch up fast when you need to and get out of distance with what you develop first yourself.... a example of that is stealth technology.
In reply to Post #16
The Nimitz case is fascinating. There are two crazy interviews with the pilot Dave Fravor, one with Joe Rogan and the other with Lex Fridman. Both completely mind blowing, check them out if you've not seen them.
The TR3B thing is funky but it doesn't add up for me. If it was using some kind of gravity manipulation why would it use the flying wing design previous stealth bombers used? Lift would no longer be relevant.
The Nimitz case is fascinating. There are two crazy interviews with the pilot Dave Fravor, one with Joe Rogan and the other with Lex Fridman. Both completely mind blowing, check them out if you've not seen them.
The TR3B thing is funky but it doesn't add up for me. If it was using some kind of gravity manipulation why would it use the flying wing design previous stealth bombers used? Lift would no longer be relevant.
In reply to Post #15
In the same vane think about this.
Take the year 1900 as the benchmark/starting point.
Pre 1900
Humans had been around for thousands of years up to the year 1900, at this point we were still pretty much getting around on horses, long distance communication was limited, power sources and weapons were equally limited as was just about everything on the planet compared to where mankind is today in 2021.
Remember that's where mankind was in 1900 after THOUSANDS of years.
Post 1900
So now explain how mankind has progressed to where we are today (on the moon, flying drones on Mars, nuclear energy and weapons, mobile phones, jet planes the list is endless)
All this progression in just 121 years!!!!!!! ONE HUNDRED AND TWENTY ONE YEARS versus THOUSANDS!!!
What happened? What changed? Who flicked the switch? and the pace of progression isn't slowing.
Did something or someone pay Earth a visit and flick the switch?
In the same vane think about this.
Take the year 1900 as the benchmark/starting point.
Pre 1900
Humans had been around for thousands of years up to the year 1900, at this point we were still pretty much getting around on horses, long distance communication was limited, power sources and weapons were equally limited as was just about everything on the planet compared to where mankind is today in 2021.
Remember that's where mankind was in 1900 after THOUSANDS of years.
Post 1900
So now explain how mankind has progressed to where we are today (on the moon, flying drones on Mars, nuclear energy and weapons, mobile phones, jet planes the list is endless)
All this progression in just 121 years!!!!!!! ONE HUNDRED AND TWENTY ONE YEARS versus THOUSANDS!!!
What happened? What changed? Who flicked the switch? and the pace of progression isn't slowing.
Did something or someone pay Earth a visit and flick the switch?
In reply to Post #19
It's a good question innit.....
But 3000 years or more ago we built the pyramids apparently.
Have a look at Graham Hancock's cataclysm theory. Really interesting stuff.
It's a good question innit.....
But 3000 years or more ago we built the pyramids apparently.
Have a look at Graham Hancock's cataclysm theory. Really interesting stuff.
In reply to Post #20
When you realize we know nothing about 80% of the world's oceans/seas who knows what's out or down there.
When you realize we know nothing about 80% of the world's oceans/seas who knows what's out or down there.
In reply to Post #1
I'm sure there is a bloody huge space rock going past the earth on 11th of this month........2.5 million away but in NASA terms that's close so perhaps this rocket is going to give it nudge this way so we can stop worrying about Covid and Global warming for a while........
I'm sure there is a bloody huge space rock going past the earth on 11th of this month........2.5 million away but in NASA terms that's close so perhaps this rocket is going to give it nudge this way so we can stop worrying about Covid and Global warming for a while........
In reply to Post #22
lol
lol