In reply to Post #12
Just read your review on BAF and it's spot on. I do the same when preparing my bait. But, as I've never bought from BAF before, just wanted to check if they're any good...and going by the replies they obviously are!
Cheers 👍

In reply to Post #13
I haven't used squid hydrolosate from BAF yet, but every squid hydrolosate I have used from other companies, Nash, Hinders, etc has always been thin. It then thickens up over time.

The Nash one was matched with a bait called Bling, which they didn't sell for very long. I was gutted when they discontinued it

In reply to Post #13
Request an up to date technical sheet and compare it with the one on their website which is from 2018.

In reply to Post #17
Bling

Remember that, around the same times as the FF (formula fish), one of my mates used it, like you say they didn't stay around for long, not sure why?

In reply to Post #19
Yeah Bling was a cracking bait. Apparently it was Nash's first bait with pre-digested fishmeal. I don't know how true that is mind.

I remember formula fish, yeah. They did formula duck as well. Sorry I mean formula 1. No I mean formula duck lol

In reply to Post #15
The crab is not a hydro, it's an extract. Hence it is a lot thinner.

In reply to Post #21
I believe hydros are initially thin as a certain amount of water is needed for the hydrolysis.
Then water is removed by evaporation to make it more stable.

In reply to Post #22
Yep. To hydrolyse is to breakdown an extract, or compound with water. 👍

Ok so I'm not saying its an issue just asking if it could be fine at so thin compared to the fish or other hyrdos they do. The label has water as a content in it but as stated all hydros do as part of the process.


Will not worry as its catching the fish anyhow and that's what matters