CarpForum.co.uk brand mark, a blue stylized fish with a white eye and a smooth modern look, set in the site header against a clean background CarpForum.co.uk wordmark in a bold flowing script style, reading CarpForum.co.uk, displayed in the site header
Menu
Utils
Go Premium Who's Online Members Weather Photo Gallery Articles
Account
Login Register
Stainless outnof fashion? (51 posts / 3,618 views)
NickGordon NickGordon
Posts: 3,121
Post #16 12 Jul 2020 08:41
0
In reply to Post #1
There is a very good reason for metal i.e stainless over carbon, and that is stainless is stronger, not quite so easy to break.

As much as I like the thought of nice and light on a long walk, I would be worried about breaking carbon sticks on the bank. It only takes a slip and falling on a carbon bankstick and you have a nice set of splinters.

Plus pushing carbon sticks into some of the hard ground swims on my waters could be grinding the 'point' and breaking it.

Nice to have a lovely carbon pod, but again the weight of the pod is useful in itself, so I prefer stainless.
stuart666 stuart666
Posts: 4,779
Post #17 12 Jul 2020 08:45
0
In reply to Post #15
I never found the weight an issue with stainless. I used to use a jag compact 316 pod with 4 banksticks and i wouldn't of been able to notice any difference if i had a prolite version in my rucksack instead of a stainless one when everything else was in there.
Bivvybug Bivvybug
Posts: 2,458
Post #18 12 Jul 2020 09:32
0
In reply to Post #1
As someone in a big name tackle shop said a pod needs to be heavy so it is stable and don't fall over stainless of course is heavier but as someone on here said it still looks and works good after 20 years I wonder what the black will look like in 20 years
Bigted50 Bigted50
Posts: 283
Post #19 12 Jul 2020 10:06
0
In reply to Post #18
Yes agree weight can help a lot to keep it all secure.

Tried black stuff , carbon stuff,ali stuff and all in the bin destroyed too flimsy and prone to breaking no good in the middle of nowhere

Heavy duty rock solid stainless for me lasts a lifetime too.

RigDemon RigDemon
Posts: 1,458
Post #20 12 Jul 2020 10:08
0
In reply to Post #18
There's no way I'd feel confident knocking in a few carbon sticks into hard ground in the same way I do with a set of Keith Fieldings augured 316 stainless sticks. I doubt they'd last 5 minutes.

Also how long will the pins last between the carbon and metal?

Funny how people follow a bandwagon. I think by far the way forward is going to be titanium, not that it's any different in appearance to stainless but it's as strong and lightweight.

I think if I did buy any black stuff it would chip in no time.

Stainless all the way 👍

Enut Enut
Posts: 1,419
Post #21 12 Jul 2020 11:44
0
In reply to Post #1
I've had Chris Brown stuff for 30+ years, still have my original bars and banksticks. Yes it's black and aluminium but it's as simple and bullet proof as you can get, but then I grew up in the era when to be 'ultra cult' everything had to be black, if it wasn't black when you bought it then you painted it!

I have a set of titanium banksticks and a stainless pod but they rarely get used.
biggsyhaulin biggsyhaulin
Posts: 1,667
Post #22 12 Jul 2020 12:22
0
In reply to Post #19
👍😎 get some weight ,solar is all you need,
dickweed dickweed
Posts: 1,268
Post #23 12 Jul 2020 12:52
0
In reply to Post #21
When I was a noddy in the early 80's the carp anglers covered all the gear with black insulation tape.

Bank sticks, landing net poles, gas canisters, chair legs and tackle boxes.
Old-Cornishman
Posts: 688
Post #24 12 Jul 2020 14:01
0
In reply to Post #16
Exactly.
Although carbon fibre is very strong for its weight, it is very brittle, susceptible to breakage at section changes and very intolerant of impacts.
If your kit goes on a barrow then my in my view it's an inferior product over stainless (for this use) as it's weight saving is more than offset by the above disadvantages

If you are carrying your kit then titanium might be justified but you certainly pay for that privilege
braders1978 braders1978
Posts: 18,195
Post #25 12 Jul 2020 14:47
0
In reply to Post #24
Defiant mps,quality and no dearer than the likes of jag.Its the best bankware I have owned
daveman daveman
Posts: 2,377
Post #26 12 Jul 2020 17:24
0
In reply to Post #25
I had one of the original Steve Neville ones, that baby wasn't going anywhere when set up. Probably reduced my bag weight by 25% when I sold it lol. Cracking piece of kit though.
Halfcentury
Posts: 1,284
Post #27 12 Jul 2020 17:44
0
It is with me. Trying to avoid being the skint bloke with the large hernia and slipped discs. How much?
duggs
Posts: 5,559
Post #28 12 Jul 2020 18:38
0
In reply to Post #24
With weight, a lot of anglers are quick to say "it's only a couple of kilos", but once you start that you quickly end up with 20kgs of extra weight on the barrow.

I bought the cheap cygnet stuff years back and have replaced a lot less than I thought I would
Fortysteve Fortysteve
Posts: 734
Post #29 12 Jul 2020 18:58
0
As bankware is something that is designed to be pushed/hammered(?!) into gravelly hard ground, and remain stable when supporting 3 rods and overly massive reels, then stainless in my eyes is the only logical option.
I used jag prolite to save on weight, and although it is robust for aluminium, it still doesn't have that satisfying solid feel to it. I then momentarily flirted with Century carbon, and after one session and shoving the pretty carbon sticks into gravel, I see the light and sold it. MPE titanium was excellent and I regretfully sold it as I was made an offer I couldn't refuse.
I'm now back to faithful Jag stainless, and although it may have added an extra pound or two to my kit, I know that it'll out last me!
Tinhead Tinhead
Posts: 17,090
Post #30 12 Jul 2020 19:14
0
Didn't realise there was a suggestion that stainless may of gone out of fashion. Just shows how much out of touch I am
Are you sure?

This action cannot be undone.

Yes, continue

Loading…