In reply to Post #163
Naa i appreciate your input. I think my way of thinking is completely incompatible with yours though
i couldn't care less what anyone else wants to do. I think the country has more than enough money to give everyone a universal basic income. Not everyone wants to be a 'slave to the system' if some people want to doss about and not "succeed" i think they should have that right in life.
If you wanted to live a life above the basic standard, you can put as much effort in as you want, and get as rich as you want. But who is defining success? Is it successful to work 90 hours a week for your life and die in a solid gold coffin, or is it successful to spend 90 hours a week with your friends, family and raising your kids.
Elon Musk is a big fan of UBI, which doesn't really fit his usual politics, he is backing Rupert Lowe. So wonder how that idea will go down.
Naa i appreciate your input. I think my way of thinking is completely incompatible with yours though
i couldn't care less what anyone else wants to do. I think the country has more than enough money to give everyone a universal basic income. Not everyone wants to be a 'slave to the system' if some people want to doss about and not "succeed" i think they should have that right in life. If you wanted to live a life above the basic standard, you can put as much effort in as you want, and get as rich as you want. But who is defining success? Is it successful to work 90 hours a week for your life and die in a solid gold coffin, or is it successful to spend 90 hours a week with your friends, family and raising your kids.
Elon Musk is a big fan of UBI, which doesn't really fit his usual politics, he is backing Rupert Lowe. So wonder how that idea will go down.
In reply to Post #164
Just promise me that my algorithm will not turn into FreePalestine videos at every turn afterwards mate
Not a chance....you wouldn't believe who runs Google and YouTube
Just promise me that my algorithm will not turn into FreePalestine videos at every turn afterwards mate
Not a chance....you wouldn't believe who runs Google and YouTube
In reply to Post #133
I work in child protection. The majority of women and children are abused by husbands, fathers, step fathers, brothers, grandfathers and/or family friends.
I also sit on a weekly panel where domestic abuse cases are discussed. The majority of those cases are white British families in a large town in the north west with a significant ethnic population.....
I work in child protection. The majority of women and children are abused by husbands, fathers, step fathers, brothers, grandfathers and/or family friends.
I also sit on a weekly panel where domestic abuse cases are discussed. The majority of those cases are white British families in a large town in the north west with a significant ethnic population.....
In reply to Post #169
But is that because white British are the worst offenders, or because other entnicities/nationalities haven't reported it as much?
But is that because white British are the worst offenders, or because other entnicities/nationalities haven't reported it as much?
In reply to Post #169
I don't follow the largest ethnicity in the uk is white, if you take that into the correct context they are probably the same.
If you work in child protection you should know ethnicity is not a cause of abuse "” it's influenced by social, economic and interpersonal factors, and abuse occurs in all communities.
I don't follow the largest ethnicity in the uk is white, if you take that into the correct context they are probably the same.
If you work in child protection you should know ethnicity is not a cause of abuse "” it's influenced by social, economic and interpersonal factors, and abuse occurs in all communities.
In reply to Post #171
I think you missed, my point which was a reply to a previous post. For the avoidance of doubt, violence towards women and the abuse of children is a male problem. Not culture, not race, not colour...
I think you missed, my point which was a reply to a previous post. For the avoidance of doubt, violence towards women and the abuse of children is a male problem. Not culture, not race, not colour...
The front runner to be the next Chair of Ofcom, the person who will decide what is allowed to be shown on the TV, radio and online, is Baroness Hodge. An 81yr old Egyptian Zionist secular Jew.
She has a history of covering up child sexual abuse, including Savilles victims. A member of the Fabian society, member of LFI, she used to work for Tony Blair, and Mandelson, in fact she campaigned with Mandelson in 2024.
She has a history of covering up child sexual abuse, including Savilles victims. A member of the Fabian society, member of LFI, she used to work for Tony Blair, and Mandelson, in fact she campaigned with Mandelson in 2024.
There's currently no official confirmation of who will be appointed
Regarding her history of cover ups, like a lot of things that get said where is evidence ? YouTube ?
Criticising political records or regulatory philosophy is fair game; focusing on ethnicity, religion, or using guilt-by-association with people like Tony Blair or Peter Mandelson isn't.
I'm sure Ofcom will do the necessary due diligence
Regarding her history of cover ups, like a lot of things that get said where is evidence ? YouTube ?
Criticising political records or regulatory philosophy is fair game; focusing on ethnicity, religion, or using guilt-by-association with people like Tony Blair or Peter Mandelson isn't.
I'm sure Ofcom will do the necessary due diligence
In reply to Post #174
I'm sure Ofcom will do the necessary due diligence
Yeah, I don't trust any of them. With respect. Did you actually look into her before you replied? Or just assumed I'm some conspiracy nut?
This is just one event involving her. Her whole career stinks.
LINKY POO™ https://www.theguardian.com/society/2003/nov/19/childrensservices.childrensministry
I'm sure Ofcom will do the necessary due diligence
Yeah, I don't trust any of them. With respect. Did you actually look into her before you replied? Or just assumed I'm some conspiracy nut?
This is just one event involving her. Her whole career stinks.
LINKY POO™ https://www.theguardian.com/society/2003/nov/19/childrensservices.childrensministry
In reply to Post #174
Criticising political records or regulatory philosophy is fair game; focusing on ethnicity, religion, or using guilt-by-association with people like Tony Blair or Peter Mandelson isn't.
If keir Starmer was raising his kids as Muslims, it would be all over GB news 24h a day, it would be all over social media, and probably mentioned in this thread. "We're a Christian country!!!!"
Yet nobody talks about him raising his kids Jewish.
I agrees what difference does it make what religion he raises his kids, or who he's married to, but you must agree there are double standards at play here.
We don't talk enough about Jewish/Israeli influence in our politics, because people are terrified of being labeled an anti-semite. You can slag off muslims as much as you like though.
Criticising political records or regulatory philosophy is fair game; focusing on ethnicity, religion, or using guilt-by-association with people like Tony Blair or Peter Mandelson isn't.
If keir Starmer was raising his kids as Muslims, it would be all over GB news 24h a day, it would be all over social media, and probably mentioned in this thread. "We're a Christian country!!!!"
Yet nobody talks about him raising his kids Jewish.
I agrees what difference does it make what religion he raises his kids, or who he's married to, but you must agree there are double standards at play here.
We don't talk enough about Jewish/Israeli influence in our politics, because people are terrified of being labeled an anti-semite. You can slag off muslims as much as you like though.
I feel people don't understand why i think Zionism is completely incompatible with British values, and why it is a threat.
Zionism fundamentally is a political ideology that says Jewish people have the right to a Nation in their ancestral homeland.
I agree with that statement at face value, but what is their Ancestral homeland? According to the bible, the land that God promised to Abraham it's pretty much most of the Middle East. The modern state of Israel was created in 1948 and has been at war trying to expand ever since. The current Israli government believes in Greater Israel, this not just the Land from Palestine/gaza/westbank it also covers syria, Jordan Lebanon and Egypt.
Iran is the only military in the middle east with the capabilities to stop Israel from expanding further, however, the USA is a strong ally of Israel. This is why they want regeime change in Iran.
The USA is about to get dragged into yet another war on behalf of Israel. Yet another war in the middle east that will displace yet more immigrants into Europe, and drive up prices on everything, especially fuel.
Suporting the current state of Israel, does not help the UK in any way, it makes us less safe. Nobody in our government, or regulatory body's should be in support of beliefs that are damaging to the core values of the UK.
So why do SO many of our politicians explicitly support the state of Israel?
Zionism fundamentally is a political ideology that says Jewish people have the right to a Nation in their ancestral homeland.
I agree with that statement at face value, but what is their Ancestral homeland? According to the bible, the land that God promised to Abraham it's pretty much most of the Middle East. The modern state of Israel was created in 1948 and has been at war trying to expand ever since. The current Israli government believes in Greater Israel, this not just the Land from Palestine/gaza/westbank it also covers syria, Jordan Lebanon and Egypt.
Iran is the only military in the middle east with the capabilities to stop Israel from expanding further, however, the USA is a strong ally of Israel. This is why they want regeime change in Iran.
The USA is about to get dragged into yet another war on behalf of Israel. Yet another war in the middle east that will displace yet more immigrants into Europe, and drive up prices on everything, especially fuel.
Suporting the current state of Israel, does not help the UK in any way, it makes us less safe. Nobody in our government, or regulatory body's should be in support of beliefs that are damaging to the core values of the UK.
So why do SO many of our politicians explicitly support the state of Israel?
"The current Israeli government believes in Greater Israel, this not just the Land from Palestine/gaza/westbank it also covers syria, Jordan Lebanon and Egypt."
Just look at the Israeli flag, the 2 blue lines represent the rivers Nile and Euphrates with the star of David between. So from Egypt all the way to and including Iraq .
As for the birth of Israel in 1940s as an ancestral home for persecuted Jews..not true , there are pretty much no Israeli people with ancestral ties to the "promised" land, they are all European and Slavic peoples. That's why DNA based genealogy is banned in Israel.
Zionism and Israel goes back further than that.look up the 1917 Balfour declaration. Further back than that the whole ideology was constructed by the Rosthchilds in the mid to late 1800's just as the the potential for vast oil reserves were being discovered in the region. In short Israel was concieved as the western oligarchys attack dog in the middle east and Persian gulf. This was the beginning of the fall of the British empire and the start of the rise of the American empire.
Just look at the Israeli flag, the 2 blue lines represent the rivers Nile and Euphrates with the star of David between. So from Egypt all the way to and including Iraq .
As for the birth of Israel in 1940s as an ancestral home for persecuted Jews..not true , there are pretty much no Israeli people with ancestral ties to the "promised" land, they are all European and Slavic peoples. That's why DNA based genealogy is banned in Israel.
Zionism and Israel goes back further than that.look up the 1917 Balfour declaration. Further back than that the whole ideology was constructed by the Rosthchilds in the mid to late 1800's just as the the potential for vast oil reserves were being discovered in the region. In short Israel was concieved as the western oligarchys attack dog in the middle east and Persian gulf. This was the beginning of the fall of the British empire and the start of the rise of the American empire.
In reply to Post #131
We have imported the third world's problems here. These are middle east problems. NOT British problems... NOT UNTILL we imported the third world here.
Never such a true word said
The simple thing is they will never be able to contribute to our society. Their country's are a reflection of their people and their cultures. Light years behind ours, all these illegals are just littering the streets, they cannot and will not be able to contribute to our society and "fit in"
Let's face it, the Pakistani community as a whole cannot really integrate into our society, they are creating their own culture, Mosque building etc. In Bradford historically they all worked in the mills, which have now gone, they are taxi drivers, shop or curry house owners as a whole. A lot are getting educated and going into professional positions, dentists, doctors, lawyers, engineers, it's not hard graft, easy money and that's why they do it. You won't find them where there is any hard graft. Where I live it's pit villages and there are none and that's the reason why. I spent some time at Huddersfield university and it was like spot the white man, the majority of the classes were Asian, these will be filling all these former mentioned positions in the future. We are on the verge of being white trash in our country!
So regardless of the Pakistani population in the UK, what are all these illegals going to do other than turn to crime and milk our system even more. All these adults at the top knew what they were doing when they opened the flood gates, I just hope it all backfires on them all, and personally. It's the normal folk living amongst these scum and communities that's in danger
We have imported the third world's problems here. These are middle east problems. NOT British problems... NOT UNTILL we imported the third world here.
Never such a true word said
The simple thing is they will never be able to contribute to our society. Their country's are a reflection of their people and their cultures. Light years behind ours, all these illegals are just littering the streets, they cannot and will not be able to contribute to our society and "fit in"
Let's face it, the Pakistani community as a whole cannot really integrate into our society, they are creating their own culture, Mosque building etc. In Bradford historically they all worked in the mills, which have now gone, they are taxi drivers, shop or curry house owners as a whole. A lot are getting educated and going into professional positions, dentists, doctors, lawyers, engineers, it's not hard graft, easy money and that's why they do it. You won't find them where there is any hard graft. Where I live it's pit villages and there are none and that's the reason why. I spent some time at Huddersfield university and it was like spot the white man, the majority of the classes were Asian, these will be filling all these former mentioned positions in the future. We are on the verge of being white trash in our country!
So regardless of the Pakistani population in the UK, what are all these illegals going to do other than turn to crime and milk our system even more. All these adults at the top knew what they were doing when they opened the flood gates, I just hope it all backfires on them all, and personally. It's the normal folk living amongst these scum and communities that's in danger
I think we all need to put the debating aside and go fishing ðŸ‘🼠✌ï¸
In reply to Post #180
And the reason being?
Touching on something that does not suit your bias Jase?
And the reason being?
Touching on something that does not suit your bias Jase?