In reply to Post #1575
So facts are now colouring to suit a bias? Okay then little buddy.
Tbh I'd say telling someone that they have a constant need to seek approval is an insult, especially when it's very far from the truth.
So facts are now colouring to suit a bias? Okay then little buddy.
Tbh I'd say telling someone that they have a constant need to seek approval is an insult, especially when it's very far from the truth.
In reply to Post #1574
Sad demise?
You make it sound like he was a decent bloke who's gone downhill. This isn't the case. He got elected by telling racists it's ok to be racist, banging on about building walls and muslim bans, and threw a few gallons of petrol on the sad little fire that was the world of conspiracy theorists with the cobblers about Obama's birth certificate.
He was a self-obsessed buffoon when he won, and he's now a self-obsessed buffoon of a loser.
Sad demise?
You make it sound like he was a decent bloke who's gone downhill. This isn't the case. He got elected by telling racists it's ok to be racist, banging on about building walls and muslim bans, and threw a few gallons of petrol on the sad little fire that was the world of conspiracy theorists with the cobblers about Obama's birth certificate.
He was a self-obsessed buffoon when he won, and he's now a self-obsessed buffoon of a loser.
In reply to Post #1577
Either way he is still a billionaire. A sad, pathetic little billionaire that needs the approval of others around them constantly and sees life as a popularity contest.
I've said it over and over. He cheats at golf so he has no self respect and no one should respect him.
Either way he is still a billionaire. A sad, pathetic little billionaire that needs the approval of others around them constantly and sees life as a popularity contest.
I've said it over and over. He cheats at golf so he has no self respect and no one should respect him.
In reply to Post #1577
Yeah, that's the sole reason he got voted in by the majority, all those decent folk amongst them
People want change, I can see why people voted for him, make America great again, jobs, import taxes for starters, there were good amongst bad. He had an opportunity and did not deliver
I wish we had someone with bollox but more level headed i would vote for them today!
What are we going to have, another ****ing muppet after another walking the same old road
Yeah, that's the sole reason he got voted in by the majority, all those decent folk amongst them
People want change, I can see why people voted for him, make America great again, jobs, import taxes for starters, there were good amongst bad. He had an opportunity and did not deliver
I wish we had someone with bollox but more level headed i would vote for them today!
What are we going to have, another ****ing muppet after another walking the same old road
In reply to Post #1576
Have you ever let anyone have the last word?
tiat
Have you ever let anyone have the last word?
tiat
In reply to Post #1570
I'm not sure terrorism can be categorised by colour. People refer to Islamist terrorists, not brown ones.
For arguments sake if over 5.5% of those white terror suspects are radical Muslim converts then Islamist terror (without a percentage of those ‘black and others') will dwarf all other causes and no doubt read as the biggest threat to the nation in an opposing paper or report.
It amazes me the mob in Washington didn't all get killed, shame
I'm not sure terrorism can be categorised by colour. People refer to Islamist terrorists, not brown ones.
For arguments sake if over 5.5% of those white terror suspects are radical Muslim converts then Islamist terror (without a percentage of those ‘black and others') will dwarf all other causes and no doubt read as the biggest threat to the nation in an opposing paper or report.
It amazes me the mob in Washington didn't all get killed, shame
In reply to Post #1580
People that deserve it
People that deserve it
In reply to Post #1581
You're right there are nuances in it. But again, my point was referring to the white supremacist terrorists in America, who were, believe it or not, all white and all right wing.
Terrorism can be categorised in many different ways. Politics, religion,, nationality, colour, etc. All valid metrics depending on what you're reporting on.
You're right there are nuances in it. But again, my point was referring to the white supremacist terrorists in America, who were, believe it or not, all white and all right wing.
Terrorism can be categorised in many different ways. Politics, religion,, nationality, colour, etc. All valid metrics depending on what you're reporting on.
In reply to Post #1582
tiat in my previous post= this is a test. And you keep on failing.
Maybe this time?
tiat in my previous post= this is a test. And you keep on failing.
Maybe this time?
In reply to Post #1583
Plus, one man's terrorist is another's hero.
Plus, one man's terrorist is another's hero.
In reply to Post #1585
Yup.
Yup.
In reply to Post #1584
Nope
Nope
In reply to Post #1570
but i wont engage in your pathetic tit for tat tinhead.
But you are
but i wont engage in your pathetic tit for tat tinhead.
But you are
In reply to Post #1588
For goodness sake, it's no surprise other members don't contribute to these threads.
I dare say Mr Normal is thoroughly sick of this petty tit-for-tattery tactic.
For goodness sake, it's no surprise other members don't contribute to these threads.
I dare say Mr Normal is thoroughly sick of this petty tit-for-tattery tactic.
In reply to Post #1588
That was before you insulted me little buddy.
Or did you stupidly think you'd do your normal insult and duck for cover routine?
That was before you insulted me little buddy.
Or did you stupidly think you'd do your normal insult and duck for cover routine?