CarpForum.co.uk brand mark, a blue stylized fish with a white eye and a smooth modern look, set in the site header against a clean background CarpForum.co.uk wordmark in a bold flowing script style, reading CarpForum.co.uk, displayed in the site header
Menu
Utils
Go Premium Who's Online Members Weather Photo Gallery Articles
Account
Login Register
Carpology YOU TUBE ‘Reviews’ (30 posts / 4,102 views)
Cookie7
Posts: 21
Post #1 26 Feb 2021 19:12
0
Just watched the latest Carpology YOU TUBE product review (NASH powered barrow thingy) and these are all advertisements for company products, devoid of any real assessment of what's good and maybe what could be improved on. Yes you don't need to watch them but come on Carpology don't frame these as reviews if it's really a endorsement of the major brands whatever the quality of the item - end of rant!
Willyworm
Posts: 154
Post #2 26 Feb 2021 19:22
0
In reply to Post #1
It's been happening for 25+ years.
Never ever see a bad revue of any tackle in any of the mags.
Bad revue = no advertising money.
Until forums cam along I thought I was the only person who bought rubbish tackle that had been praised in magazines.
NOJOAKES NOJOAKES
Posts: 3,289
Post #3 26 Feb 2021 19:22
0
In reply to Post #1
You only just realised I've never seen them test a bad product apparently
2ndChance 2ndChance
Posts: 2,946
Post #4 26 Feb 2021 21:04
0
In reply to Post #3
I actually bought one of their so called excellent products advertised, which turned out to be complete manure Sat on the fence for a few days, till someone in here gave humpty dumpty a nudge ... nuffin´bu´shi`te
Chuffy Chuffy
Posts: 6,794
Post #5 27 Feb 2021 10:47
0
In reply to Post #2
Yes the mags have just been printing press releases and calling them 'reviews' for years, same with Carpology etc but in video form. Simon Crow goes into it on his latest Carp Cast interview, tells it as it is.
sharpda sharpda
Posts: 151
Post #6 27 Feb 2021 11:47
0
In reply to Post #5
The last negative “review” I heard was on the carp fishing podcast when they talked about worse purchases. The issue is companies only review what they are sent for free and how many people reviewing are paid by the company. From what it sounds like now is that nothing gets fully field tested anymore other then bait
DirkDiggler DirkDiggler
Posts: 2,502
Post #7 27 Feb 2021 13:19
0
In reply to Post #1
I watched a Preston vid about their new feeder reels which are apparently years in the making and development.

A genuine contender against Daiwa and Shimano.....Had one in my hands yesterday...absolutely pants.

How do they sleep at night...nestled up on your hard earned cash.
TeeCee
Posts: 2,009
Post #8 27 Feb 2021 16:14
0
So I see Nash still haven't sorted out the wheel spinning activity yet, kin jokers

A mate bought one of those Nash barrow's and f..ked it off quick sharp, bought a decent one instead, Prestige's 2020 24v number, no more wheel spinning bulls-hit.
Baitman Baitman
Posts: 5,233
Post #9 27 Feb 2021 16:17
0
In reply to Post #5
And they often only do these "reviews" for companies that advertise with them, so they are milking their own cash cow.
giving their mates a reach around
cyprymike cyprymike
Posts: 1,268
Post #10 27 Feb 2021 19:37
0
I only usually buy sober purchases once fully researched on forums such as this.
Baza1075
Posts: 552
Post #11 28 Feb 2021 00:36
0
I thought the review was very informative. It showed you that the barrow needs pushing if you get any amount of mud and snow
AaronB1992 AaronB1992
Posts: 341
Post #12 28 Feb 2021 11:08
0
In reply to Post #11
I really do like Carpology, but as a youngster I was definitely guilty of thinking 'if it's in the magazines it must be good!' 🤣🤣

Can't necessarily blame them though, tough times for printed mags as it is, so to start losing potential income by upsetting brands probably isn't the way to go
SilureMark
Posts: 1,282
Post #13 28 Feb 2021 13:54
0
In reply to Post #1
Carpology? Worst mag on the market - under exposed pictures and text so small, you need magnifying glass to read it. Reviews? You'll never see anything negative and in some cases, utter BS. I can recall their review of a Trakker cradle unhooking mat - saying it was 'compact and portable... easy to pack down...'. It's the size of a small child when packed down and packing it away - you have to wrestle it to death, just to get it in its bag. No mention in their review that you can't seal the stuff ack properly, so if it's not stored upright, the boot of your car gets a good soaking. Having said that, they're all the same, Total Carp? Total Crap! NEVER buy an angling product based on a magazine review.
NickGordon NickGordon
Posts: 3,121
Post #14 28 Feb 2021 17:08
0
In reply to Post #12

Can't necessarily blame them though, tough times for printed mags as it is, so to start losing potential income by upsetting brands probably isn't the way to go

That has been the way for years.
Some magazines don't make money from sales, but from advertising.

Personally I have given up reading magazine reviews, I prefer long term test results, usually learning more from forum answers.
However there are times when even those need to be taken with a pinch of salt; knowing some anglers are 'sponsored' or 'field testers', or things like line, for some reason not everyone gets on with a particular brand.

That last comment is not being difficult, but many, many anglers got on with Big Game. Myself and a couple of mates found it was awful. I could not get on with Ultima lines, yet I have a mate who swears by them, he can't get on with Gardner Pro.
AaronB1992 AaronB1992
Posts: 341
Post #15 28 Feb 2021 17:42
0
In reply to Post #14
Yeah I agree entirely mate. I used to get caught in the trap of changing hooks, bait etc, you name it, by what the magazines said. I soon learnt to stick with what I know works and only ever change now if I am struggling on a new venue and there is a clear reason that it's something I need to change.
Are you sure?

This action cannot be undone.

Yes, continue

Loading…