|
|
|
|
In reply to Post #1864
Stepping in to replace Oscar de la Hoya against an mma fighter . David haye fighting his mate 5 stone lighter than him. And no doubt a few other weird match ups.
|
|
|
|
In reply to Post #1864
evander holyfield
WTF 
|
|
|
|
In reply to Post #1862
Its a really good card on friday Gerry , sat night would you believe evander holyfield !!! And also David haye .
|
|
|
|
In reply to Post #1862
Good spot Gerry ,nice one
|
|
|
|
In reply to Post #1861
boxing on chan 5 Friday 10/9 SAM EGGINGTON VS BILEL JKITOU
|
|
|
|
In reply to Post #1858
Echo that, she is by far the best i have seen, superb 
|
|
|
|
In reply to Post #1859
yes by unanimous points decision
|
|
|
|
In reply to Post #1858
Did benn win?
|
|
|
|
In reply to Post #1857
She is the best woman boxer ever one of only eight boxers in history (female or male) to hold all four major world titles in boxing—WBA, WBC, IBF, and WBO—simultaneously
she has won 18 gold medals ! (google)
but she is 35 now
and yes terrible cut it was a fair decision I fell asleep and missed the Benn and Ebanie Bridges v Mailys Gangloff match
|
|
|
|
|
Bad cut that.K t superb .
|
|
|
|
In reply to Post #1855
Decent night of boxing
|
|
|
|
Sat boxing
WARRINGTON vs LARA
BENN vs GRANADOS
KATIE TAYLOR vs HAN
plus others 
|
|
|
|
In reply to Post #1852
I know myself that he’ll try scrape every penny from him that he can. I also know tonight’s fight is a backward step for Nathan. As for River Wilson Bent at this moment in time he needs Nathan more.
Nothing to do with loyalty to my mate and yet now you’re saying facts as stated.
Absolute fantasy land where someone APPARENTLY told Warren how good Bent was in training. He’s sparred with River Wilson but I’ll just leave it there as to how that went. All I’ll say is that what you say as apparently ‘apparently- what on earth does that even mean?’ being relayed back to Frank is absolute 30110k5.
As for loyalty towards Nathan I’ve said previously if he turns out not to be good enough then it won’t be through a lack of trying and he’d have lived the dream. Anyone would think my loyalty makes him out to be this or that.
Edit - Notice that you say Warren pulled Nathan out and yet previously you said Nathan and Warren pulled out. Why you made Nathan out to be running scared I don’t know.
|
|
|
|
In reply to Post #1852
I know myself that he’ll try scrape every penny from him that he can. I also know tonight’s fight is a backward step for Nathan. As for River Wilson Bent at this moment in time he needs Nathan more.
Nothing to do with loyalty to my mate and yet now you’re saying facts as stated.
Absolutele fantasy land where someone APPARENTLY told Warren how good Bent was in training. He’s sparred with River Wilson but I’ll just leave it there as to how that went. All I’ll say is that what you say has apparantly ‘apparently- what on earth does that even mean?’ being relayed back to Frank is absolute 30110k5.
As for loyalty towards Nathan I’ve said previously if he turns out not to good enough then it won’t be through a lack of trying and he’d have lived the dream. Anyone would think my loyalty makes him out to be this or that.
|
|
|
|
In reply to Post #1849
I understand your loyalty to your mate but the facts as stated in boxing news mag and various other sources are that frank warren cancelled the fight and that heaney had a massive row with him over it as its a fight he wanted ! As i said previously warren will get every penny out of him before throwing him on the scrap heap , the choice of opponent tonight is a step backward in his career not forward as is the case with river wilson bent whom if he wins though im not convinced he will will then be on the world stage.
Nathan is a talented lad but does now need to step up as you say he was fighting much better opponents in his first few fights.
The fight did,nt happen because warren would,nt sign the contract .
|
|
