Torn between these two can't make my mind up, to go on 10ft rods. Both seem to get great reviews.
In reply to Post #1
Got both, the Daiwa is slightly better Reel, better built feels more solid.
Daiwa has a normal drag (slower).
Okuma is slightly smaller, and fast drag.
Both weigh the same.
Even though I prefer the Daiwa, for a 10 foot rod and close in work I'd go to my Okuma. (just)
Better balance.
Got both, the Daiwa is slightly better Reel, better built feels more solid.
Daiwa has a normal drag (slower).
Okuma is slightly smaller, and fast drag.
Both weigh the same.
Even though I prefer the Daiwa, for a 10 foot rod and close in work I'd go to my Okuma. (just)
Better balance.
In reply to Post #1
just the anti reverse problem put me right off the okuma,
just the anti reverse problem put me right off the okuma,
Can't offer a comparison as I have never handled the Okuma but the Emcast 25a is a cracking reel, I would happily use them over my Cast'izms.
In reply to Post #3
Ive never had a problem with it but know a few who have.
Ive never had a problem with it but know a few who have.
In reply to Post #5
I have had both - the daiwa emcast is a much better reel - feels more solid and better drag. I have since got rid of the Okumas cracking reels for the price.
I have had both - the daiwa emcast is a much better reel - feels more solid and better drag. I have since got rid of the Okumas cracking reels for the price.
In reply to Post #6
Ditch both and go for a Wychwood extricator -great big spool ,small body,good clip, look good. Future fishing do them with quick drag spools.
Ditch both and go for a Wychwood extricator -great big spool ,small body,good clip, look good. Future fishing do them with quick drag spools.