Well, I that was a rough ride watching young Kyle Rittenhouse go through that trial which should have never been brought against him in lieu of the videographic evidence. Kyle is literally a hero 👌
I'm not surprised one bit that the lefties are trying to stoke riots, I mean, what the hell has this got to do with black people? Three white people were legally shot in self defense, two of whom are no more, yet somehow BLM activists are trying to equate these legal shootings with black people being shot, I mean, how disingenuous can some be?
I'm not surprised one bit that the lefties are trying to stoke riots, I mean, what the hell has this got to do with black people? Three white people were legally shot in self defense, two of whom are no more, yet somehow BLM activists are trying to equate these legal shootings with black people being shot, I mean, how disingenuous can some be?
In reply to Post #1
Legit judge & a jury that wouldn't back down to obvious intimidation & total BS from certain media outlets!!
The judicial system obviously works in the US as it did in the Floyd case !!
Legit judge & a jury that wouldn't back down to obvious intimidation & total BS from certain media outlets!!
The judicial system obviously works in the US as it did in the Floyd case !!
In reply to Post #1
He's really not a hero, and this sets a dangerous precedent where the logical endpoint is full blown civil war in America.
It appears he was acquitted within the strict definition of the law which surprisingly includes entitlement to shoot if he believed he was going to be assaulted. You have to wind back from the trial and then consider gun and public order laws that allow a creepy white 17 year old to travel from out of state and march into a crowd where his appearance with a semi automatic rifle would generate alarm and anger. It goes without saying that had he been black he'd have been hunted down and killed by the police.
The precedent this sets is appalling - basically armed individuals can freely turn up at a protest and start shooting if they believe they are going to be assaulted. Armed militias is a term you associate with Lebanon or Gaza, instead this is Wisconsin and Michigan. It'll end in a blood bath or white suprematists and fascists in America will drive all protest off the streets. After that they'll come to victims' homes looking for them.
He's really not a hero, and this sets a dangerous precedent where the logical endpoint is full blown civil war in America.
It appears he was acquitted within the strict definition of the law which surprisingly includes entitlement to shoot if he believed he was going to be assaulted. You have to wind back from the trial and then consider gun and public order laws that allow a creepy white 17 year old to travel from out of state and march into a crowd where his appearance with a semi automatic rifle would generate alarm and anger. It goes without saying that had he been black he'd have been hunted down and killed by the police.
The precedent this sets is appalling - basically armed individuals can freely turn up at a protest and start shooting if they believe they are going to be assaulted. Armed militias is a term you associate with Lebanon or Gaza, instead this is Wisconsin and Michigan. It'll end in a blood bath or white suprematists and fascists in America will drive all protest off the streets. After that they'll come to victims' homes looking for them.
In reply to Post #3
So the White guy who pointed a gun at Rittenhouse wasn't a creepy white guy then 🤦♂️
I guess you were oblivious to those peaceful protests according to CNN across America last year then ?
If you'd followed the trial you would have realised that it was a total sham & that was the evidence produced by the prosecution 😂
So the White guy who pointed a gun at Rittenhouse wasn't a creepy white guy then 🤦♂️
I guess you were oblivious to those peaceful protests according to CNN across America last year then ?
If you'd followed the trial you would have realised that it was a total sham & that was the evidence produced by the prosecution 😂
In reply to Post #4
He cearly didn't fancy killing someone in cold blood so probably not.
He cearly didn't fancy killing someone in cold blood so probably not.
In reply to Post #4
Well, I did follow it so not really sure what point you're trying to make. I'd have thrown the book at his mother, too - some parenting that.
Well, I did follow it so not really sure what point you're trying to make. I'd have thrown the book at his mother, too - some parenting that.
In reply to Post #6
What point the fact that he was acquitted of all chargers by 12 juror's
What point the fact that he was acquitted of all chargers by 12 juror's
In reply to Post #5
Someone points a gun at you you are entitled to use deadly force in the US which he did entirely legally as the the acquittal proves 🤷♂️
Someone points a gun at you you are entitled to use deadly force in the US which he did entirely legally as the the acquittal proves 🤷♂️
In reply to Post #8
Instead of travelling across state lines with an assault rifle, he could have stayed at home and nobody would have died. Instead, his mother drove him straight into the middle of the protest where he killed people. If you think that's justifiable in any way, then I certainly can't help you - likely, nobody can.
Instead of travelling across state lines with an assault rifle, he could have stayed at home and nobody would have died. Instead, his mother drove him straight into the middle of the protest where he killed people. If you think that's justifiable in any way, then I certainly can't help you - likely, nobody can.
In reply to Post #9
Awww did the verdict hurt your feelings do you feel offended? But heh you obviously know better than the jurors or do you just tend to disagree with a fair legal system ?
Awww did the verdict hurt your feelings do you feel offended? But heh you obviously know better than the jurors or do you just tend to disagree with a fair legal system ?
In reply to Post #10
It's not about feelings. Trying to argue this way just makes your position even less convincing than it already was.
Here's what I said;
"It appears he was acquitted within the strict definition of the law which surprisingly includes entitlement to shoot if he believed he was going to be assaulted."
I understand the legal system.
Tell me, what do you think should be done with desperate kids in this country who carry knives in self defense?
It's not about feelings. Trying to argue this way just makes your position even less convincing than it already was.
Here's what I said;
"It appears he was acquitted within the strict definition of the law which surprisingly includes entitlement to shoot if he believed he was going to be assaulted."
I understand the legal system.
Tell me, what do you think should be done with desperate kids in this country who carry knives in self defense?
In reply to Post #11
Here's what the jury said Not Guilty end of all your butt hurt posturing ain't going to change anything 🤦♂️
May I suggest Vaseline
Here's what the jury said Not Guilty end of all your butt hurt posturing ain't going to change anything 🤦♂️
May I suggest Vaseline
Clown.
In reply to Post #9
I don't think the rifle crossed state lines on the day of the shooting to be fair.
I also very much doubt it was an ‘assault' rifle. Civilian ar15s are just single round and basically a long pistol.
I don't think the rifle crossed state lines on the day of the shooting to be fair.
I also very much doubt it was an ‘assault' rifle. Civilian ar15s are just single round and basically a long pistol.
In reply to Post #13
The fact that one of his victims was a multiple times convicted Nonce makes me think he probably did the world a favour !!
The fact that one of his victims was a multiple times convicted Nonce makes me think he probably did the world a favour !!