In reply to Post #98
Do you actually believe in the point you are trying to make or are you just arguing it for the sake of it?
Do you actually believe in the point you are trying to make or are you just arguing it for the sake of it?
In reply to Post #98
But I would guarantee alot of anglers would know exactly what lake it was, without me actually naming it. This is EXACTLY the same but on a lesser scale.
So going back to my original point, if I wanted to keep it hush hush, if I didnt mention Ellis point, or the Korda video, it would be a hell of alot harder for people to know where I'm fishing
But I would guarantee alot of anglers would know exactly what lake it was, without me actually naming it. This is EXACTLY the same but on a lesser scale.
So going back to my original point, if I wanted to keep it hush hush, if I didnt mention Ellis point, or the Korda video, it would be a hell of alot harder for people to know where I'm fishing
In reply to Post #100
Why do you ask such stupid questions? If someone wants something not named, then someone else basically say **** it if he won't name it I will, that a **** move. Very ignorant.
Why do you ask such stupid questions? If someone wants something not named, then someone else basically say **** it if he won't name it I will, that a **** move. Very ignorant.
In reply to Post #101
No it's not.
So all of you, if you had a piece on info you decided to keep quiet, then someone else took it upon themselves to decide to disclose it anyway, you'd all be fine with that? Because if so, you really do need to have a word with yourselves
No it's not.
So all of you, if you had a piece on info you decided to keep quiet, then someone else took it upon themselves to decide to disclose it anyway, you'd all be fine with that? Because if so, you really do need to have a word with yourselves
In reply to Post #103
I'm afraid it is
I'm afraid it is
What makes one persons decision not to name somewhere for whatever reason the basis of prohibiting any one else from naming / talking about it?
Is one persons decision enough to overrule everyone else's?
It's a public water, PUBLIC
Ps maybe those that think they have more entitlement than others should take a look at themselves rather than those that just get on with life
Is one persons decision enough to overrule everyone else's?
It's a public water, PUBLIC
Ps maybe those that think they have more entitlement than others should take a look at themselves rather than those that just get on with life
In reply to Post #103
If I had a water I wanted to keep quiet I wouldn't drive there, video myself fishing there then release it on the internet to plug my sponsors bait company.
I don't understand where you are struggling with this one?
If I had a water I wanted to keep quiet I wouldn't drive there, video myself fishing there then release it on the internet to plug my sponsors bait company.
I don't understand where you are struggling with this one?
In reply to Post #105
Well the bloke who named it after jt decided not to is the one showing the entitlement, and you lot are defending that. So that makes you as bad.
Well the bloke who named it after jt decided not to is the one showing the entitlement, and you lot are defending that. So that makes you as bad.
In reply to Post #106
I'm not struggling at all chap, you lot are the ones who don't seem to grasp simple etiquette
I'm not struggling at all chap, you lot are the ones who don't seem to grasp simple etiquette
In reply to Post #108
I wouldn't make the video in the first place. I don't agree with whoring out your fishing to make money. It ruins it for everybody.
How's that for etiquette?
I wouldn't make the video in the first place. I don't agree with whoring out your fishing to make money. It ruins it for everybody.
How's that for etiquette?
In reply to Post #108
Is this the same etiquette as Tel had when put a video out on the Blue Lagoon and named it, and the same etiquette as Dave Lane has when he puts a video out and names Kingsmead, or more recently Yateley??
Is this the same etiquette as Tel had when put a video out on the Blue Lagoon and named it, and the same etiquette as Dave Lane has when he puts a video out and names Kingsmead, or more recently Yateley??
In reply to Post #107
Nonsense. People asked, someone answered
As bad? Well, as it's not a bad thing to be sharing information about a public water on a forum for sharing information that has both a uk and foreign venues section, then that's not bad at all.
Nonsense. People asked, someone answered
As bad? Well, as it's not a bad thing to be sharing information about a public water on a forum for sharing information that has both a uk and foreign venues section, then that's not bad at all.
In reply to Post #109
Yeah climb up on your high horse chap. Disclosing info others decided not to is bad etiquette, arrogance ,plain snide. If that were really you're opinion you wouldn't be on here defending the naming. Because youre literally contradicting yourself
Yeah climb up on your high horse chap. Disclosing info others decided not to is bad etiquette, arrogance ,plain snide. If that were really you're opinion you wouldn't be on here defending the naming. Because youre literally contradicting yourself
In reply to Post #110
They chose to name. Jt didn't and matey just did it anyway. There's your difference. Arrogance
They chose to name. Jt didn't and matey just did it anyway. There's your difference. Arrogance
In reply to Post #113
Oh right, so it's ok for them to name it and not others??
Oh right, so it's ok for them to name it and not others??