In reply to Post #14
The Lo Pro is miles easier and quicker to set up imo mate. No faffing about with poles etc.
The Lo Pro is miles easier and quicker to set up imo mate. No faffing about with poles etc.
In reply to Post #1
just thought I would mention an alternative due out middle Sept
the NEW Wychwood tactical brolly 7 rib ......... W 2400mm D 1400mm H 1200mm 6kg
just thought I would mention an alternative due out middle Sept
the NEW Wychwood tactical brolly 7 rib ......... W 2400mm D 1400mm H 1200mm 6kg
In reply to Post #16
30 seconds for me and no pegs.
I found that the lo pro needed at least 4 pegs to give it “ its shape” so to speak.
30 seconds for me and no pegs.
I found that the lo pro needed at least 4 pegs to give it “ its shape” so to speak.
I have tempest brolly mk1 I am on my 2nd one after I snapped the block on the first. (My fault) I had used and abused it. If you don't want a zip in front try and get a mk1 2nd hand. I agree would be great to see a smaller version in the future.
Only thing I would say is to tighten up the bolts every now and again they have a habit of coming loose.
Only thing I would say is to tighten up the bolts every now and again they have a habit of coming loose.
In reply to Post #19
I would agree with a lot of the comments on here. I have a Mk1 Tempest brolly and the wrap (for winter) as it lacks any zips for a front. I have recently just gone back to a new style brolly+front option with a flat back. The Tempest although very light (i also stripped the mudflap off) and very quick and stable to put up, it is quite big in tight swims and its shape means there is quite a lot of wasted space at the back(if you don't want your bedchair touching the material that is). As with most things, a bit of maintenance is also needed (tightening of nuts/bolts etc) and i found the material was not a patch on my old pioneer ultralite which might also contribute to its lightness?
The tempest will always be more stable in high winds compared to a standard brolly even without the customary four storm rods you would otherwise need for a standard brolly and the more pegs. The pole thickness alone is the reason for that.
If i had the version or a conversion(Army Andy) to attach a front i would probably continue with it on most occasions because for most of the year and swim dependent it is very good.
Matt
P.S I have my tempest+wrap in the for sale section atm if that appeals to anyone. But rest assured if it is not sold i will continue using it when the brolly wont cut it in some conditions.
I would agree with a lot of the comments on here. I have a Mk1 Tempest brolly and the wrap (for winter) as it lacks any zips for a front. I have recently just gone back to a new style brolly+front option with a flat back. The Tempest although very light (i also stripped the mudflap off) and very quick and stable to put up, it is quite big in tight swims and its shape means there is quite a lot of wasted space at the back(if you don't want your bedchair touching the material that is). As with most things, a bit of maintenance is also needed (tightening of nuts/bolts etc) and i found the material was not a patch on my old pioneer ultralite which might also contribute to its lightness?
The tempest will always be more stable in high winds compared to a standard brolly even without the customary four storm rods you would otherwise need for a standard brolly and the more pegs. The pole thickness alone is the reason for that.
If i had the version or a conversion(Army Andy) to attach a front i would probably continue with it on most occasions because for most of the year and swim dependent it is very good.
Matt
P.S I have my tempest+wrap in the for sale section atm if that appeals to anyone. But rest assured if it is not sold i will continue using it when the brolly wont cut it in some conditions.