In reply to Post #15
His name is spelled Loeb.
You should consult it yourself sometime.
According to you, flavours are useless, but Loeb himself received a positive feed reaction to imitation maple flavour.
Although Loeb did receive indifferent reactions to various essential oils, he emulsified them first in chemicals that may have had negative properties. His work is therefore irrelevant on the issue of EOs.
His name is spelled Loeb.
You should consult it yourself sometime.
According to you, flavours are useless, but Loeb himself received a positive feed reaction to imitation maple flavour.
Although Loeb did receive indifferent reactions to various essential oils, he emulsified them first in chemicals that may have had negative properties. His work is therefore irrelevant on the issue of EOs.
In reply to Post #16
but Loeb himself received a positive feed reaction to imitation maple flavour.
Now I wonder....was that because of the fenugreek it may have contained by any chance
but Loeb himself received a positive feed reaction to imitation maple flavour.
Now I wonder....was that because of the fenugreek it may have contained by any chance
In reply to Post #15
Loeb's report may be online, but practical experience from my own testing and experience goes against a lot of what is on there.
And my friend, that is far more important than reading up on something.
Loeb's report may be online, but practical experience from my own testing and experience goes against a lot of what is on there.
And my friend, that is far more important than reading up on something.
In reply to Post #18
Hallelujah. Finally a voice of reason.
Hallelujah. Finally a voice of reason.