Hi all....
Apologies in advance if this is a daft question...
I am struggling to understand which is the smallest Tempest? I don't want vents, i'd like light as possible and i'm not fussed about aquatex.
Seems like it is the current Tempest Brolly V2, is that right? The depth on the Tempest Advanced brolly appears to be 10cm less, however it has vents.
I've always thought they look massive (i have a compact bed, and only take a TA rucksack, bait bucket, TA cool bag and a water butt. Would be handy to stick the rod sleeve inside if its raining but thats about it.
the speed of erection (steady), free standing and solid without storm rods really appeals..... though still worried they are too big for my needs.
Anyone in a similar situation and can shed any light on it before i try to find somewhere to look in person?
thanks, Tim
Apologies in advance if this is a daft question...
I am struggling to understand which is the smallest Tempest? I don't want vents, i'd like light as possible and i'm not fussed about aquatex.
Seems like it is the current Tempest Brolly V2, is that right? The depth on the Tempest Advanced brolly appears to be 10cm less, however it has vents.
I've always thought they look massive (i have a compact bed, and only take a TA rucksack, bait bucket, TA cool bag and a water butt. Would be handy to stick the rod sleeve inside if its raining but thats about it.
the speed of erection (steady), free standing and solid without storm rods really appeals..... though still worried they are too big for my needs.
Anyone in a similar situation and can shed any light on it before i try to find somewhere to look in person?
thanks, Tim
In reply to Post #1
Tempest v2 brolly is the smallest basic version or what about the Sonik AXS brolly
Tempest v2 brolly is the smallest basic version or what about the Sonik AXS brolly
In reply to Post #1
Yes it's the V2 brolly and I agree it's still pretty big. I've had a few brollies and the V2 is by far the biggest. Still packs down small enough and is pretty light. Decent mate.
Yes it's the V2 brolly and I agree it's still pretty big. I've had a few brollies and the V2 is by far the biggest. Still packs down small enough and is pretty light. Decent mate.
In reply to Post #3
Tempest advanced brolly is smaller than the V2 Brolly I have had both and the mozzi mesh off the V2 doesn't fit the advanced its too big.
Tempest advanced brolly is smaller than the V2 Brolly I have had both and the mozzi mesh off the V2 doesn't fit the advanced its too big.
In reply to Post #4
The V2 Brolly is 125H x 230D x 250W cm.
The Advanced is 125H x 220D x 250W cm.
So you're right!
The V2 Brolly is 125H x 230D x 250W cm.
The Advanced is 125H x 220D x 250W cm.
So you're right!
In reply to Post #5
Yep, i did see that, unfortunately an extra 3 kg for vents (which i will never use) isnt particularly appealing. good to know though!
Yep, i did see that, unfortunately an extra 3 kg for vents (which i will never use) isnt particularly appealing. good to know though!
In reply to Post #6
Likewise buddy.
Likewise buddy.
In reply to Post #3
It does seem to be that way. its a shame they have put so much emphasis on widening the range on the bigger end, without considering a smaller option. a Tempest 75 brolly would be nice! No vents, smaller footprint, a bit lighter but goes up quicker than a brolly and overs the stability of a tempest.
I've got a low pro, though have got and been using an aqua fast and light, which although a very good brolly, i'd rather an something you dont have to use storm rods on.
It does seem to be that way. its a shame they have put so much emphasis on widening the range on the bigger end, without considering a smaller option. a Tempest 75 brolly would be nice! No vents, smaller footprint, a bit lighter but goes up quicker than a brolly and overs the stability of a tempest.
I've got a low pro, though have got and been using an aqua fast and light, which although a very good brolly, i'd rather an something you dont have to use storm rods on.
In reply to Post #5
Its strange how there identical width and height yet the fronts don't fit each other the opening of the V2 must be slightly larger I think. They are noticeably heavier though having gone from a V2 to an advanced.
Its strange how there identical width and height yet the fronts don't fit each other the opening of the V2 must be slightly larger I think. They are noticeably heavier though having gone from a V2 to an advanced.
In reply to Post #8
I also have a Lo Pro and use that for most of my fishing. I got the V2 specifically for one reservoir where the mahoosive winds just want to eat the Lo Pro alive.
I do rate it though, it's good
I also have a Lo Pro and use that for most of my fishing. I got the V2 specifically for one reservoir where the mahoosive winds just want to eat the Lo Pro alive.
I do rate it though, it's good
In reply to Post #9
When i saw the different dimensions of the Brolly and the Advanced i presumed that was a typo, so good to know. thanks mate.
When i saw the different dimensions of the Brolly and the Advanced i presumed that was a typo, so good to know. thanks mate.
In reply to Post #10
hmmm..... if i cna find a new one to look at i might take a punt on a second hand V2 and off load the F&L.
use the V2 if i need something sturdier and to give me more space in the winter.
thanks mate.
hmmm..... if i cna find a new one to look at i might take a punt on a second hand V2 and off load the F&L.
use the V2 if i need something sturdier and to give me more space in the winter.
thanks mate.
In reply to Post #12
You could pick up a V1 for next to nothing and they're even lighter
You could pick up a V1 for next to nothing and they're even lighter
My v1 weighs in at 4.2 kg after I cut out the mud skirt and front wing bits.
I did try a low pro a while back but found it a bit small for my standard Bedchair and a bit too much messing about to set up compared to the Tempest. Luckily I was able to get a full refund.
I very rarely use pegs with my tempest.
I did try a low pro a while back but found it a bit small for my standard Bedchair and a bit too much messing about to set up compared to the Tempest. Luckily I was able to get a full refund.
I very rarely use pegs with my tempest.
I've just bought a Tempest 100T, having fished for years under a mk1 trakker 60”.
First thoughts are what an awesome bit of kit, goes up mega quick and is rock solid- only downside is the weight of it, but that's fine on a barrow.
For 10cm difference, may just be worth getting the tempest Brolly?
First thoughts are what an awesome bit of kit, goes up mega quick and is rock solid- only downside is the weight of it, but that's fine on a barrow.
For 10cm difference, may just be worth getting the tempest Brolly?
In reply to Post #14
The Lo Pro is miles easier and quicker to set up imo mate. No faffing about with poles etc.
The Lo Pro is miles easier and quicker to set up imo mate. No faffing about with poles etc.
In reply to Post #1
just thought I would mention an alternative due out middle Sept
the NEW Wychwood tactical brolly 7 rib ......... W 2400mm D 1400mm H 1200mm 6kg
just thought I would mention an alternative due out middle Sept
the NEW Wychwood tactical brolly 7 rib ......... W 2400mm D 1400mm H 1200mm 6kg
In reply to Post #16
30 seconds for me and no pegs.
I found that the lo pro needed at least 4 pegs to give it “ its shape” so to speak.
30 seconds for me and no pegs.
I found that the lo pro needed at least 4 pegs to give it “ its shape” so to speak.
I have tempest brolly mk1 I am on my 2nd one after I snapped the block on the first. (My fault) I had used and abused it. If you don't want a zip in front try and get a mk1 2nd hand. I agree would be great to see a smaller version in the future.
Only thing I would say is to tighten up the bolts every now and again they have a habit of coming loose.
Only thing I would say is to tighten up the bolts every now and again they have a habit of coming loose.
In reply to Post #19
I would agree with a lot of the comments on here. I have a Mk1 Tempest brolly and the wrap (for winter) as it lacks any zips for a front. I have recently just gone back to a new style brolly+front option with a flat back. The Tempest although very light (i also stripped the mudflap off) and very quick and stable to put up, it is quite big in tight swims and its shape means there is quite a lot of wasted space at the back(if you don't want your bedchair touching the material that is). As with most things, a bit of maintenance is also needed (tightening of nuts/bolts etc) and i found the material was not a patch on my old pioneer ultralite which might also contribute to its lightness?
The tempest will always be more stable in high winds compared to a standard brolly even without the customary four storm rods you would otherwise need for a standard brolly and the more pegs. The pole thickness alone is the reason for that.
If i had the version or a conversion(Army Andy) to attach a front i would probably continue with it on most occasions because for most of the year and swim dependent it is very good.
Matt
P.S I have my tempest+wrap in the for sale section atm if that appeals to anyone. But rest assured if it is not sold i will continue using it when the brolly wont cut it in some conditions.
I would agree with a lot of the comments on here. I have a Mk1 Tempest brolly and the wrap (for winter) as it lacks any zips for a front. I have recently just gone back to a new style brolly+front option with a flat back. The Tempest although very light (i also stripped the mudflap off) and very quick and stable to put up, it is quite big in tight swims and its shape means there is quite a lot of wasted space at the back(if you don't want your bedchair touching the material that is). As with most things, a bit of maintenance is also needed (tightening of nuts/bolts etc) and i found the material was not a patch on my old pioneer ultralite which might also contribute to its lightness?
The tempest will always be more stable in high winds compared to a standard brolly even without the customary four storm rods you would otherwise need for a standard brolly and the more pegs. The pole thickness alone is the reason for that.
If i had the version or a conversion(Army Andy) to attach a front i would probably continue with it on most occasions because for most of the year and swim dependent it is very good.
Matt
P.S I have my tempest+wrap in the for sale section atm if that appeals to anyone. But rest assured if it is not sold i will continue using it when the brolly wont cut it in some conditions.
Reading ALL pages