I like the ECU alot but I Love the cult history of the Nevs, The simplicity is tempting but I may miss the extra features of the ECU or if I get the ECU Will I always long for the Nevs.
Anyone with experience of both ? I dont expect one to perform better than the other as both are great but why did you pick one over the other ?
Anyone with experience of both ? I dont expect one to perform better than the other as both are great but why did you pick one over the other ?
In reply to Post #1
I've had the ecu's for around 18 months and they've never missed a beat, been used through winter without a problem,
I've had the ecu's for around 18 months and they've never missed a beat, been used through winter without a problem,
In reply to Post #2
My Nevs had very tiny screws on the back covers , very easy for the threads to knacker up.i would deffo go with the ECU mate Nevs are very basic.
My Nevs had very tiny screws on the back covers , very easy for the threads to knacker up.i would deffo go with the ECU mate Nevs are very basic.
In reply to Post #3
ECU's also have a tiny screw on the back, to hold cover in place. Never had Nevs, so cant comment but absolutely love my ECU MK1's
ECU's also have a tiny screw on the back, to hold cover in place. Never had Nevs, so cant comment but absolutely love my ECU MK1's
In reply to Post #1
I have both , ECUs are modern and full of features , Nevs are a classic and simple . Both reliable and tell you when you have a bite .
I have both , ECUs are modern and full of features , Nevs are a classic and simple . Both reliable and tell you when you have a bite .
In reply to Post #5
If you had to only have the one ?
If you had to only have the one ?
In reply to Post #1
Had Neville's for years never missed a beat , no issues with any cracks on the four I own .
Basic but do the job .
Had Neville's for years never missed a beat , no issues with any cracks on the four I own .
Basic but do the job .