CarpForum.co.uk brand mark, a blue stylized fish with a white eye and a smooth modern look, set in the site header against a clean background CarpForum.co.uk wordmark in a bold flowing script style, reading CarpForum.co.uk, displayed in the site header
Menu
Utils
Go Premium Who's Online Members Weather Photo Gallery Articles
Account
Login Register
DSLR lenses (36 posts / 2,415 views)
duggs
Posts: 5,559
Post #31 18 Oct 2020 16:56
0
In reply to Post #30
Have you still got a kit lens to try it out?

The cost is a big difference, I don't know about sharpness or focussing speed but small differences just from the change in focal length will be

A slight difference in subject isolation(background blur)
Your camera will have to be 50% further away
A very slight difference in perspective, if you were on the same spot with the same fish and someone took pics with a 50 and a 35 with the same framing you'd notice the difference but generally most wouldnt (smaller fish, bigger ears with the 50)
Also for lighting, the extra distance will use a bit more power, while lessening the difference in brightness between you and the background (assuming your using a flash on camera)

Personally if I was to buy a second prime I'd go more than one step in focal length


Edit, I was getting mixed up with canon, the cost isn't much of a factor with nikon
NOJOAKES NOJOAKES
Posts: 3,289
Post #32 18 Oct 2020 17:07
0
In reply to Post #31
Haven't got the kit lens mate. Point taken regarding lighting, I hadn't thought about that. What lens would you get to accompany the 35
Thanks
duggs
Posts: 5,559
Post #33 18 Oct 2020 17:20
0
In reply to Post #32
A good zoom

Without another lens to compare, you could do a mock catch shot in the garden, then move the camera 50% further, open up to 1.8 and then crop to match framing. It won't be perfect but will give you a visual idea of the difference
hyperloop hyperloop
Posts: 2,798
Post #34 18 Oct 2020 18:50
0
In reply to Post #32
What do you want it to do mate?

The 35 is perfect for trophy shots, you won't get much better without spending £££.

If it's just for general use... I find myself using my telephoto far more than anything these days. Keeps me occupied on the bank, at work and basically whenever I'm out and about
NOJOAKES NOJOAKES
Posts: 3,289
Post #35 18 Oct 2020 19:19
0
In reply to Post #34
I just find my pics aren't quite as sharp as I'd like them. I know it's more than likely the settings and I'm rubbish But just thinking if it's perfectly suited to my d3300.
I do also need another lens that can do anything kids wildlife trophy shots etc if you have any suggestions
Thanks
duggs
Posts: 5,559
Post #36 18 Oct 2020 22:13
0
In reply to Post #35
Take some shots where the flash is the main light, if these are soft the lens may be the issue, if they're sharp it's a settings problem

A telephoto is nice to have, and often aren't bad for macro with the right adaptor
Are you sure?

This action cannot be undone.

Yes, continue

Loading…