CarpForum.co.uk brand mark, a blue stylized fish with a white eye and a smooth modern look, set in the site header against a clean background CarpForum.co.uk wordmark in a bold flowing script style, reading CarpForum.co.uk, displayed in the site header
Menu
Utils
Go Premium Who's Online Members Weather Photo Gallery Articles
Account
Login Register
Coronavirus and fishing (1,184 posts / 72,931 views)
Chuffy Chuffy
Posts: 6,794
Post #287 29 Mar 2020 11:53
0
In reply to Post #286
That's up to you, did you watch any of the videos as well?
noj
Posts: 11,459
Social photographer...
Social photographer... Post #288 29 Mar 2020 12:02
0
In reply to Post #281
The **** storm will continue for a decade or more mate
Not sure any virus has ever been eradicated but plenty of people have starved and frozen to death during the ‘good times'
The deaths are horrific, I don't doubt that. Months on end of no economic activity will be catastrophic.
Make sure your house is secure in the coming months!!!!!
Tinhead Tinhead
Posts: 17,089
Post #289 29 Mar 2020 12:03
0
In reply to Post #287
No didn't watch the videos there's only so many I can watch.
My conclusion is there is no conclusion just the Guardian doing its stuff.
blackfield blackfield
Posts: 2,651
Post #290 29 Mar 2020 13:54
0
In reply to Post #289
As opposed to the sun, star, express, fail, torygraph, times......
Chuffy Chuffy
Posts: 6,794
Post #291 29 Mar 2020 14:01
0
In reply to Post #290
Exactly, I'd rather listen to one of the world's leading figues on pandemics rather than a journalist or 'Susan off Facebook'

Perspectives on the Pandemic: Dealing with Coronavirus, a fiasco in the making?


most people won't be bothered to watch it, rather get info in soundbites/clickbait off Facebook etc
Tinhead Tinhead
Posts: 17,089
Post #292 29 Mar 2020 14:13
0
In reply to Post #290
I didn't intentionally try to make it political but I'm sure those you mention are doing their stuff as well as Susan on Facebook or youtube.
I prefer to listen to the NHS, I don't believe in the conspiracy theories going around so if they've got it wrong then I believe at least they didn't do it on purpose.
Chuffy Chuffy
Posts: 6,794
Post #293 29 Mar 2020 14:23
0
In reply to Post #292
They haven't got anything wrong at all it's just the way what is happening is being interpreted, a prime example to me is the 'Nightingale Hospitals'. Now as far as I can tell most people are taking that as a sure sign we are on the brink of Armageddon and that within the year life will be like a scene from a Mad Max film. Or could it be, as I see it, is it actually the case that the hospitals are being battered by this because they still have to deal with running the Oncology Wards, the Thoracic Wards, the Maternaity Wards, the A+E depts etc etc etc, none of the everyday stuff that a hospital deals with has gone away, so why not build temp hospitals where all the people riddled with CV can be put so as to let the hospitals return to dealing with all the **** they normally have to deal with and also get the infected away from all the other 'normal' patients?

But hey, maybe it's just me.
ocelot ocelot
Posts: 1,802
Post #294 29 Mar 2020 14:40
0
In reply to Post #293
Isolation hospital's are nothing new. It's been done for thousands of years with plagues, disease etc. Some that were for TB I remember as a kid. It works.
Tinhead Tinhead
Posts: 17,089
Post #295 29 Mar 2020 14:43
0
In reply to Post #293
That sounds the best use of a temporary hospital to me and thought that's what they would be used for.
I'm doing as I'm told and keeping indoors, not because I believe I will die if I get the disease but I don't want to unknowingly spread it to someone who I may never meet but won't be able to cope and may sadly will die.
tonymartin
Posts: 143
Post #296 29 Mar 2020 14:52
0
In reply to Post #293
Something about the numbers we are being given doesn't seem to add up to me:

10,000 cv cases, 1,200 hospitals in the uk (including private) shouldn't our hospitals be able to handle these extra people? That's about 8-9 extra patients per hospital (assuming all have been hospitalised).
mal mal
Posts: 8,986
Post #297 29 Mar 2020 14:58
0
In reply to Post #296
It's not as simple as that mate.

Think of the other contributing factors.

Expected increase over the coming weeks

Huge numbers of NHS staff unable to work

Specific need for intensive care and isolated facilities.

So many other things alongside the basic numbers that make the maths of cases divided by hospitals a redundant figure


Edit - it's a bit like saying there are 250 carp in the lake and 10 anglers, so they will all catch 25 fish....
braders1978 braders1978
Posts: 18,195
Post #298 29 Mar 2020 14:59
0
In reply to Post #293
There is something not right about the virus,how it started and how it's spread
ocelot ocelot
Posts: 1,802
Post #299 29 Mar 2020 15:01
0
In reply to Post #296
The distribution of cases isn't uniform. Large population area's seem to show rapid plumes of infections, overwhelming the area's hospital capacity. Plus you've had a 10 year drive to make the NHS "more efficient" that means you cut out over capacity as it's deemed a waste. Not so good when a pandemic hits you.
noj
Posts: 11,459
Social photographer...
Social photographer... Post #300 29 Mar 2020 15:03
0
In reply to Post #297
25 in the whole of Hereford
Over 200 just in my London borough
That said, I'm sure there's hundreds of thousands of cases worldwide going untested, possibly millions
I think the average number of deaths this time of year is above 10k per week
Chuffy Chuffy
Posts: 6,794
Post #301 29 Mar 2020 15:15
0
In reply to Post #298
There is something not right about the virus,how it started and how it's spread

If you watch the video I put up earlier, there is every chance that without the media and the panic created it could have actually gone unnoticed and just been seen as a slight 'bump' in the normal flu/corona statistics experienced every year
Are you sure?

This action cannot be undone.

Yes, continue

Loading…