In reply to Post #1734
Jumping Spider on my Bed1

Jumping Spider on my Bed

In reply to Post #1735
Think it's jumping spider Dave, approperate when you consider what it is sitting on
Think it's jumping spider Dave, approperate when you consider what it is sitting on
In reply to Post #1736
Edited john
Edited john
In reply to Post #1737
Hi all, what do you guys use for your trophy shots? I have been looking at canon 50mm 1.8 or the 35mm, im inclined on the 50mm due to the price but dont want it breaking after a few mobths use. I would also like to use it for potraits and scenic shots, I have a canon 600D if that makes any difference.
Thanks in advance, Andrew
Hi all, what do you guys use for your trophy shots? I have been looking at canon 50mm 1.8 or the 35mm, im inclined on the 50mm due to the price but dont want it breaking after a few mobths use. I would also like to use it for potraits and scenic shots, I have a canon 600D if that makes any difference.
Thanks in advance, Andrew
In reply to Post #1738
The 35mm wide angle would be IMO a better bet as on occasions you can be stuck for space and you don't want to mess about moving backwards with a fish to get everything in. It also gives you a crop option should you need it.
On the portrait front the most recommended lens is a 70mm or 90mm which gives you the option of moving back from the object.
A short zoom lens would be needed to hit all these applications from wide angle to telephoto
A fast lens is also better in low light, which would cost more but probably worth it in the long run.
On the landscape front a medium wide angle lens such as the 35mm is what you most often see recommended.
On the cash front you could get a good second party lens for less than a Canon. Do some searches on the web and have a look at some independent reviews.
The 35mm wide angle would be IMO a better bet as on occasions you can be stuck for space and you don't want to mess about moving backwards with a fish to get everything in. It also gives you a crop option should you need it.
On the portrait front the most recommended lens is a 70mm or 90mm which gives you the option of moving back from the object.
A short zoom lens would be needed to hit all these applications from wide angle to telephoto
A fast lens is also better in low light, which would cost more but probably worth it in the long run.
On the landscape front a medium wide angle lens such as the 35mm is what you most often see recommended.
On the cash front you could get a good second party lens for less than a Canon. Do some searches on the web and have a look at some independent reviews.
In reply to Post #1739
Thanks for the quick reply and sound advice
Thanks for the quick reply and sound advice
In reply to Post #1740
Your welcome Andy. Most Canon cameras when brought with a lens attached it is usually their EFS 18-55mm zoom lens.
It's a 3.5-5.6 which is not that fast but it has image stabilization and focus down to a nice close distance.
The 18mm end is a lot wider than the 35mm lens and 55mm makes a good semi portrait lens. People call it a kit lens but it is a lot better than that
Your welcome Andy. Most Canon cameras when brought with a lens attached it is usually their EFS 18-55mm zoom lens.
It's a 3.5-5.6 which is not that fast but it has image stabilization and focus down to a nice close distance.
The 18mm end is a lot wider than the 35mm lens and 55mm makes a good semi portrait lens. People call it a kit lens but it is a lot better than that
This message has been suppressed by a moderator.
In reply to Post #1741
In reply to Post #1746
Nice one Pete! Liking the middle picture, well done
Nice one Pete! Liking the middle picture, well done








