|
|
#21 16 May 2020 at 8.51am | | | |
|
Maybe they were exploring the option of a "travel bubble" similar to the Baltic states.
|
|
|
#20 15 May 2020 at 8.10pm | | | |
|
In reply to Post #19 It's down to a lack leadership which leads too a lack of transparency.
Yes even though things are up in the air Macron should pull his finger out and make a decision regardless of the R numbers in his and other countries
|
|
|
#19 15 May 2020 at 7.39pm | | | |
|
In reply to Post #17 i cant work out if its the politicians or journalists.
It's down to a lack leadership which leads too a lack of transparency.
|
|
|
#18 15 May 2020 at 7.03pm | | | |
|
In reply to Post #17 Its probably both, politicians on both sides twisting, sampling and distorting the facts and the media are worse!
|
|
|
#17 15 May 2020 at 6.44pm | | | |
|
In reply to Post #16 There is an article in the Express and Star
The Prime Minister’s official spokesman told reporters: “If you look at what was actually said in the joint statement on Sunday night, it said no quarantine measures apply to France at this stage and the key words in that sentence are
‘at this stage’.
Seems no one knows anything for sure these days, i cant work out if its the politicians or journalists.
|
|
|
#16 15 May 2020 at 2.41pm | | | |
|
In reply to Post #15 Forgive me but I have just looked at the evil 😈 mail online and they have an article stating the government have now decided to place French travellers in quarantine, but still no explanation as to why the decision was ever made in the first place.
I know I'm a dog 🐶 with a bone 🍖 now
I also appreciate wrong decisions can be made, but if you can relationalise why you took the decision that's fine with me.
But as yet its not clear why it was decided.
I'm glad the decision has been reversed.
Keep safe peeps
|
|
| mal | Posts: 8910 | | |
|
#15 15 May 2020 at 2.14pm | | | |
|
In reply to Post #14 i gave it my best shot Mike - thing is, if the people who made the decision choose not to give us an explanation or any sense of rhyme or reason then it leaves us all equally in the dark...
maybe it comes from the same collection of brainstorm 'post-its' as the 2m distance, and 100,000 tests...
|
|
|
#14 15 May 2020 at 2.08pm | | | |
|
In reply to Post #13 Amazing , the great minds on here & the media world can't give a reason why the decision was made, I understand the rhetoric & the facts quarantine is being ( or not) implimeneted but no rhyme or reason the decision was made in the first instance.
If anyone can explain "why the decision was made I would be greatful"
Cheers
Mike
|
|
| Jon | Posts: 4271 | | |
|
#13 14 May 2020 at 10.18pm | | | |
|
Don't suppose Stanley Johnson applying for French citizenship has anything to do with it...
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8140035/Boris-Johnsons-father-Stanley-applies-FRENCH-citizen.html
|
|
| mal | Posts: 8910 | | |
|
#12 14 May 2020 at 8.49pm | | | |
|
In reply to Post #11 could be - I've not heard anything since that initial announcement but they did say there'd be further discussions and you can see the EU point in that case
|
|
|
#11 14 May 2020 at 8.40pm | | | |
|
In reply to Post #10 I thought the EU had blocked this because it’s admit one country admit all policy 🤷🏼♂️
|
|
| mal | Posts: 8910 | | |
|
#10 14 May 2020 at 8.31pm | | | |
|
In reply to Post #9 They've said it's about 'management of a common border'.
Not sure why it's only France when Belgium, Netherlands - even Denmark, Norway and Iceland could argue that same point. Maybe proximity comes into it? I'm guessing the ROI don't have a quarantine period?
It can only be finance based as there's no logical reason for it other than that
|
|
|
In reply to Post #8 Hi.
Anyone know the actual reason why the decision was made ❓
|
|
| noj | Posts: 11459 | | Social photographer... | |
|
In reply to Post #6 ...taking one look at tilbury and getting back in the boat
|
|
|
In reply to Post #6 Just because they've been living in a French refugee camp doesn't make them French
|
|