In reply to Post #1371
David ; that is a cracking picture of the moon
David ; that is a cracking picture of the moon
In reply to Post #1372
thanks, yes did see the weed
didn't want two pick it off might disturb the fish lol.
Thanks mickey i did take several exposures using my sigma 500 handheld, super lens
thanks, yes did see the weed
didn't want two pick it off might disturb the fish lol.Thanks mickey i did take several exposures using my sigma 500 handheld, super lens
In reply to Post #1371
Out of interest what were you working with here. Looking at this image again it struck me how sharp the image is across the board. Given that I would have expected the lens to be opened up because of the lack of light, you seem to have nailed the exposure.
Out of interest what were you working with here. Looking at this image again it struck me how sharp the image is across the board. Given that I would have expected the lens to be opened up because of the lack of light, you seem to have nailed the exposure.
In reply to Post #1375
Only used aperture priority on f/8 1/160sec -4/3EV iso200. it is surpising how much light you get off the moon
the sigma is sharper at f/8 than max aperture of f/6.3.
I added some sharpness contrast in aperture software
Taken handheld with a steady hand, the stabiliser did the rest
Only used aperture priority on f/8 1/160sec -4/3EV iso200. it is surpising how much light you get off the moon
the sigma is sharper at f/8 than max aperture of f/6.3.
I added some sharpness contrast in aperture software
Taken handheld with a steady hand, the stabiliser did the rest
In reply to Post #1376
The shot I was asking about is the shot with the rods, is that the one you are referring to or the moon shot
The shot I was asking about is the shot with the rods, is that the one you are referring to or the moon shot
In reply to Post #1377
sorry
using AFS-35mm lens with D5000 in vivid mode f/13 1/125sec iso100 added a little enhancing in aperture software otherwise nearly as taken.
never could get the hang of putting links on here but you can check the exif on all my shots in my flickrhttp://www.flickr.com/photos/32791195@N08/
or google dangerousdavecarper
sorry
using AFS-35mm lens with D5000 in vivid mode f/13 1/125sec iso100 added a little enhancing in aperture software otherwise nearly as taken.
never could get the hang of putting links on here but you can check the exif on all my shots in my flickrhttp://www.flickr.com/photos/32791195@N08/
or google dangerousdavecarper
In reply to Post #1378
Thanks David, That's impressive, ISO 100, I would have put the house on you using a higher setting. Just goes to show what you can produce with a DSLR. Looking forward to having a look at some more of your work using the site addresses.
You mentioned using some aperture enhancing software, what programme would that be.
Thanks David, That's impressive, ISO 100, I would have put the house on you using a higher setting. Just goes to show what you can produce with a DSLR. Looking forward to having a look at some more of your work using the site addresses.
You mentioned using some aperture enhancing software, what programme would that be.
In reply to Post #1379
http://www.apple.com/uk/aperture/?cid=mc-uk-g-mac-m-ape-brand&sissr=1
Thanks 60s rules Aperture 3 is photo enhancing software from Apple, its a fairly good organiser and enhancing program though there are quite a few things you can't do that you can in photoshop or Gimp.
I still use my Gimp for further editing at times
http://www.apple.com/uk/aperture/?cid=mc-uk-g-mac-m-ape-brand&sissr=1
Thanks 60s rules Aperture 3 is photo enhancing software from Apple, its a fairly good organiser and enhancing program though there are quite a few things you can't do that you can in photoshop or Gimp.
I still use my Gimp for further editing at times
In reply to Post #1380
I played around with GIMP for a while but having used SC4 I could not get on with it. Good software but not as user friendly as Photoshop, if you can call CS4 user friendly. I take it you are a mac user.
I played around with GIMP for a while but having used SC4 I could not get on with it. Good software but not as user friendly as Photoshop, if you can call CS4 user friendly. I take it you are a mac user.
In reply to Post #1381
Yes got fed up with my old windows vista and bought a iMac 27in few months ago upped the RAM to 12gb,
Awesome for editing lot of money but well worth it
Totally agree Gimp isn't very user freindly took me a while to figure out just some of the things you can do with it, Might get photoshop in the future
Yes got fed up with my old windows vista and bought a iMac 27in few months ago upped the RAM to 12gb,
Awesome for editing
lot of money but well worth itTotally agree Gimp isn't very user freindly took me a while to figure out just some of the things you can do with it, Might get photoshop in the future
This message has been suppressed by a moderator.
In reply to Post #1383
Nice work mate
Nice work mate
Buzzard from Great Barr Estate near Walsall.
In reply to Post #1385
lovely photo keebs
lovely photo keebs
Keebs and bungle, they are all incredible shots! 