In reply to Post #1278
Which race was it that you know are the most stupid?
Because you are implying that the most stupid race is down to a majority bad parenting, so that race has inferior parenting as a result of race?
I know exactly what you mean but you're ignoring the fact there are external factors to all of it and solely saying it's race related that there is bad parenting, lack of ambition, etc. On the majority of course not everyone.
Which race was it that you know are the most stupid?
Because you are implying that the most stupid race is down to a majority bad parenting, so that race has inferior parenting as a result of race?
I know exactly what you mean but you're ignoring the fact there are external factors to all of it and solely saying it's race related that there is bad parenting, lack of ambition, etc. On the majority of course not everyone.
In reply to Post #1280
I don't need to. You need to take your head out of the sand
I don't need to. You need to take your head out of the sand
In reply to Post #1279
Yeah really...I'm wondering if he's one of the idiots you refer to or not
Yeah really...I'm wondering if he's one of the idiots you refer to or not
In reply to Post #1283
Idiot by definition A stupid person
Could be, depends if you think he's stupid or not?
Forgot, or an idiot?
Idiot by definition A stupid person
Could be, depends if you think he's stupid or not?
Forgot, or an idiot?
In reply to Post #1282
Of course you don't need to.
Why would using language that offends be something you needed to worry about?
Blissfully ignorant
Of course you don't need to.
Why would using language that offends be something you needed to worry about?
Blissfully ignorant
In reply to Post #1285
There you go again, back to pathetic claims. You have still not answered the question about the white kid out side KFC have you, easier to keep banging the same old drum
There you go again, back to pathetic claims. You have still not answered the question about the white kid out side KFC have you, easier to keep banging the same old drum
In reply to Post #1284
Maybe can't bring himself to acknowledge any other nationality than English so refuses to type Greek
Maybe can't bring himself to acknowledge any other nationality than English so refuses to type Greek
In reply to Post #1286
Tbf you still haven't answered which race you know Is more idiotic than the other based on the data you forgot to keep
Tbf you still haven't answered which race you know Is more idiotic than the other based on the data you forgot to keep
In reply to Post #1288
Read the post again
If
But yes, I do have the picture in my head but it could be seen as derogatory instead of a honest opinion based on xperiences so let's leave it at that eh?
Unless you want to tell me that the biggest idiots are Italain (stupid person)
Or.are you just trying to cause trouble?
Read the post again
If
But yes, I do have the picture in my head but it could be seen as derogatory instead of a honest opinion based on xperiences so let's leave it at that eh?
Unless you want to tell me that the biggest idiots are Italain (stupid person)
Or.are you just trying to cause trouble?
In scozza's defence I have witnessed people of varying races, religions and social groups be promoted to management without the ‘relevant' skills; myself included.
It can however be considered good business because managing is just the management of those who are actually doing the work. If, for instance, it's an area with a high BAME population then a big proportion of the workforce would potentially better relate to a manger with similar social, religious, financial and linguistic differences and work more efficiently; or at least with less division.
Sadly that in itself feeds casual racism across the board but business is business and success almost always comes at a cost
It can however be considered good business because managing is just the management of those who are actually doing the work. If, for instance, it's an area with a high BAME population then a big proportion of the workforce would potentially better relate to a manger with similar social, religious, financial and linguistic differences and work more efficiently; or at least with less division.
Sadly that in itself feeds casual racism across the board but business is business and success almost always comes at a cost
In reply to Post #1290
Pointless trying Jon, they are racists, anti white, everybody else is persecuted in the land of.oppurtuniy and the UK is all wrong because it does not suit there map of the world.
Pointless trying Jon, they are racists, anti white, everybody else is persecuted in the land of.oppurtuniy and the UK is all wrong because it does not suit there map of the world.
In reply to Post #1286
What pathetic claims?
And what's your question?
The more you post the less you say
What pathetic claims?
And what's your question?
The more you post the less you say
In reply to Post #1289
Just trying to make the point that how you said it came across a different way than you meant it.
We all know recruitment of BAME and disabled occurs due to quotas and being perceived as fair. If it didn't then there would be no need for diversity and inclusion paperwork when applying for a job. Double edged sword as it's purpose is to ensure that no one is discriminated against however many employers use it as a way to only pursue BAME or disabled candidates to improve diversity in the workforce and don't really base it on the capability of the candidates. Of course people could lie to get jobs...I've seen it first hand with made up qualifications and even someone using a different name so they were considered for the job and not automatically binned (this was a BAME person using a British name btw).
But then if you look at it the other way round, are employers compensating for years of ignoring BAME candidates? I said a long time ago down this thread that it only takes the boss to be a racist and that creates an issue. Is it a conscious attempt to hide discrimination or even better themselves and try to make up for previous ways of thinking?
Just trying to make the point that how you said it came across a different way than you meant it.
We all know recruitment of BAME and disabled occurs due to quotas and being perceived as fair. If it didn't then there would be no need for diversity and inclusion paperwork when applying for a job. Double edged sword as it's purpose is to ensure that no one is discriminated against however many employers use it as a way to only pursue BAME or disabled candidates to improve diversity in the workforce and don't really base it on the capability of the candidates. Of course people could lie to get jobs...I've seen it first hand with made up qualifications and even someone using a different name so they were considered for the job and not automatically binned (this was a BAME person using a British name btw).
But then if you look at it the other way round, are employers compensating for years of ignoring BAME candidates? I said a long time ago down this thread that it only takes the boss to be a racist and that creates an issue. Is it a conscious attempt to hide discrimination or even better themselves and try to make up for previous ways of thinking?
In reply to Post #1291
I was just giving my views on business exploiting division..
Doesn't get you off the hook
I was just giving my views on business exploiting division..
Doesn't get you off the hook
In reply to Post #1291
Racist
Anti white
For wanting equality.
Why are you so opposed to equality is the real question.
Racist
Anti white
For wanting equality.
Why are you so opposed to equality is the real question.