In reply to Post #1290
Pointless trying Jon, they are racists, anti white, everybody else is persecuted in the land of.oppurtuniy and the UK is all wrong because it does not suit there map of the world.
Pointless trying Jon, they are racists, anti white, everybody else is persecuted in the land of.oppurtuniy and the UK is all wrong because it does not suit there map of the world.
In reply to Post #1286
What pathetic claims?
And what's your question?
The more you post the less you say
What pathetic claims?
And what's your question?
The more you post the less you say
In reply to Post #1289
Just trying to make the point that how you said it came across a different way than you meant it.
We all know recruitment of BAME and disabled occurs due to quotas and being perceived as fair. If it didn't then there would be no need for diversity and inclusion paperwork when applying for a job. Double edged sword as it's purpose is to ensure that no one is discriminated against however many employers use it as a way to only pursue BAME or disabled candidates to improve diversity in the workforce and don't really base it on the capability of the candidates. Of course people could lie to get jobs...I've seen it first hand with made up qualifications and even someone using a different name so they were considered for the job and not automatically binned (this was a BAME person using a British name btw).
But then if you look at it the other way round, are employers compensating for years of ignoring BAME candidates? I said a long time ago down this thread that it only takes the boss to be a racist and that creates an issue. Is it a conscious attempt to hide discrimination or even better themselves and try to make up for previous ways of thinking?
Just trying to make the point that how you said it came across a different way than you meant it.
We all know recruitment of BAME and disabled occurs due to quotas and being perceived as fair. If it didn't then there would be no need for diversity and inclusion paperwork when applying for a job. Double edged sword as it's purpose is to ensure that no one is discriminated against however many employers use it as a way to only pursue BAME or disabled candidates to improve diversity in the workforce and don't really base it on the capability of the candidates. Of course people could lie to get jobs...I've seen it first hand with made up qualifications and even someone using a different name so they were considered for the job and not automatically binned (this was a BAME person using a British name btw).
But then if you look at it the other way round, are employers compensating for years of ignoring BAME candidates? I said a long time ago down this thread that it only takes the boss to be a racist and that creates an issue. Is it a conscious attempt to hide discrimination or even better themselves and try to make up for previous ways of thinking?
In reply to Post #1291
I was just giving my views on business exploiting division..
Doesn't get you off the hook
I was just giving my views on business exploiting division..
Doesn't get you off the hook
In reply to Post #1291
Racist
Anti white
For wanting equality.
Why are you so opposed to equality is the real question.
Racist
Anti white
For wanting equality.
Why are you so opposed to equality is the real question.
In reply to Post #1290
you appear to have identified a positive reason for employing someone of a different race / religion / background there noj - careful now....
scozza - if you're out there, have a good day man.
you appear to have identified a positive reason for employing someone of a different race / religion / background there noj - careful now....
scozza - if you're out there, have a good day man.
In reply to Post #1292
Im fishing, difficult to keep up, another bream
I don't have to say anything I have wrote it all below, should have read it and joined in a proper debate nsted of ignoring and cherry picking, but then you don't want to do you becuase your right, but really, your wrong, you are banging on about minority issues and not the main fundamental causes
Im fishing, difficult to keep up, another bream
I don't have to say anything I have wrote it all below, should have read it and joined in a proper debate nsted of ignoring and cherry picking, but then you don't want to do you becuase your right, but really, your wrong, you are banging on about minority issues and not the main fundamental causes
In reply to Post #1296
Fishing mate, avoiding the pubs
Fishing mate, avoiding the pubs
In reply to Post #1293
But then if you look at it the other way round, are employers compensating for years of ignoring BAME candidates?
Maybe times change and things move on, good job were not back in the 1900s ain't it, mind you though, listening to some on here you would think so
But then if you look at it the other way round, are employers compensating for years of ignoring BAME candidates?
Maybe times change and things move on, good job were not back in the 1900s ain't it, mind you though, listening to some on here you would think so
In reply to Post #1298
and reality?
and reality?
In reply to Post #1300
Back from what turned out to be another bashing session
Have good day Mal, it's only cyber space
Back from what turned out to be another bashing session
Have good day Mal, it's only cyber space
"Why are you so opposed to equality is the real question"
Some are because they are racist, some are because they're misogynistic, individualism also plays a part. It's a great race that you start wherever you start and the finish is dependent on how fast you run and not predetermined in any way. Inequality is irrelevant in the race just get on with running. Its pretty easy to see the flaws when applied, in society.
Some are because they are racist, some are because they're misogynistic, individualism also plays a part. It's a great race that you start wherever you start and the finish is dependent on how fast you run and not predetermined in any way. Inequality is irrelevant in the race just get on with running. Its pretty easy to see the flaws when applied, in society.
In reply to Post #1295
WTF are you going on about. What makes you think that?
Maybe you have a problem?
WTF are you going on about. What makes you think that?
Maybe you have a problem?
In reply to Post #1302
misogynistic
I bet you have never heard of that until Trump got called it
misogynistic
I bet you have never heard of that until Trump got called it
In reply to Post #1303
Well I'm just going off the fact that people that acknowledge inequality and want equality you deem to be racist and anti white. So you can't want equality if our ideal of equality is, to you, a bad thing.
I get the feeling you like to single out and focus on one factor of something. For example race in this instance of “being stupid” or incapable of working to the standards. You attribute stupidity to parenting but don't look in to what social-economic circumstances lead to that parenting or that person not achieving in school, etc.
Well I'm just going off the fact that people that acknowledge inequality and want equality you deem to be racist and anti white. So you can't want equality if our ideal of equality is, to you, a bad thing.
I get the feeling you like to single out and focus on one factor of something. For example race in this instance of “being stupid” or incapable of working to the standards. You attribute stupidity to parenting but don't look in to what social-economic circumstances lead to that parenting or that person not achieving in school, etc.