In reply to Post #1050
Guess they are. We should thank ourselves lucky people like you and your Ike minded friends are not running the country and it's another bunch of muppets instead
MPs overpaid, possibly, something you could address first on your agenda
When this country has been milked dry and there's nothing left we will know where to look won't we, when the balance changes and there are not enough people paying taxes to sustain the nation, what should we do then, phone a friend?
Guess they are. We should thank ourselves lucky people like you and your Ike minded friends are not running the country and it's another bunch of muppets instead
MPs overpaid, possibly, something you could address first on your agenda
When this country has been milked dry and there's nothing left we will know where to look won't we, when the balance changes and there are not enough people paying taxes to sustain the nation, what should we do then, phone a friend?
In reply to Post #1051
State of you.
I genuinely believe whoever brainwashed you is having a right giggle when you start spouting rubbish.
State of you.
I genuinely believe whoever brainwashed you is having a right giggle when you start spouting rubbish.
In reply to Post #1052
Says you
This ones for charity folks
When you said you could be Prime Minister, that jobs taken at the moment. How about the Bank of England instead
Says you
This ones for charity folks
When you said you could be Prime Minister, that jobs taken at the moment. How about the Bank of England instead
In reply to Post #1053
Damaged brain in full effect here eh scoz. I said I would love to have a go at being PM but wouldn't ever make it there because I'd not sell out to a big party.
No idea when or where I said I COULD be prime minister. You're clearly cracking up old chap. Best go sit in the corner and try remember which way round your socks go
Damaged brain in full effect here eh scoz. I said I would love to have a go at being PM but wouldn't ever make it there because I'd not sell out to a big party.
No idea when or where I said I COULD be prime minister. You're clearly cracking up old chap. Best go sit in the corner and try remember which way round your socks go
In reply to Post #1054
Child genius aren't you
Child genius aren't you
In reply to Post #1055
Weeping in that corner too are you? I'm sure you'll edit your post in 20mins when you've stopped and come up with a shoddy insult.
To be fair a child is much more of a genius than you. I've heard that they can actually remember things accurately
Weeping in that corner too are you? I'm sure you'll edit your post in 20mins when you've stopped and come up with a shoddy insult.
To be fair a child is much more of a genius than you. I've heard that they can actually remember things accurately
In reply to Post #1056
Sat with a glass of New Zealand's finest
Enjoying reading the thoughts of a genius as usual. Thought about doubling your taxes?
Sat with a glass of New Zealand's finest
Enjoying reading the thoughts of a genius as usual. Thought about doubling your taxes?
In reply to Post #1057
Wow...your brain really doesn't work does it
Wow...your brain really doesn't work does it
In reply to Post #1058
Your such a charitable person, you should give a lot more, I don't understand people like you, pay 1/2 you salary to charity, you may get some satisfaction, or are you just another hypocrite?
Your such a charitable person, you should give a lot more, I don't understand people like you, pay 1/2 you salary to charity, you may get some satisfaction, or are you just another hypocrite?
In reply to Post #1059
How do you know what I give/do for charity? Are you stalking me? Is that how infatuated with me you are Not quite sure who “people like me are” tbh. Those that think public money should be spent helping people? That my taxes shouldn't be used in corrupt ways and line the pockets of the rich? The fact you don't get that is quite a reflection on yourself. A sheep and a fool.
It's funny how you think redistributing public money to feed the poor instead of the rich is somehow a bad thing. Or can you just not take it that it's actually a decent plan but because people that don't have the same opinions as you are asking for it, you have to oppose it because you're that sad?
I find it mind boggling that you're happy for your taxes to feed people that are being paid 2.5x the average British salary (as a minimum). More fool you I suppose.
How do you know what I give/do for charity? Are you stalking me? Is that how infatuated with me you are
Not quite sure who “people like me are” tbh. Those that think public money should be spent helping people? That my taxes shouldn't be used in corrupt ways and line the pockets of the rich? The fact you don't get that is quite a reflection on yourself. A sheep and a fool. It's funny how you think redistributing public money to feed the poor instead of the rich is somehow a bad thing. Or can you just not take it that it's actually a decent plan but because people that don't have the same opinions as you are asking for it, you have to oppose it because you're that sad?
I find it mind boggling that you're happy for your taxes to feed people that are being paid 2.5x the average British salary (as a minimum). More fool you I suppose.
In reply to Post #1060
Massive task running and funding this country. Too big for daydreamers anyway.
Maybe we should start doing highway robberies on the rich to top up the charity pot?
If people are paying their taxes they are abiding by the laws of the country, job done. Now if you have a problem with rich people, you need to deal with it?
Now if it's illegal, that's a completely different matter. I was very proud the other week when the drug dealer got all his assets stripped off him, more of the same please, just disappointed he didn't get sent down too?
Where should start, large corporate tax fiddles, I'm all for it
Massive task running and funding this country. Too big for daydreamers anyway.
Maybe we should start doing highway robberies on the rich to top up the charity pot?
If people are paying their taxes they are abiding by the laws of the country, job done. Now if you have a problem with rich people, you need to deal with it?
Now if it's illegal, that's a completely different matter. I was very proud the other week when the drug dealer got all his assets stripped off him, more of the same please, just disappointed he didn't get sent down too?
Where should start, large corporate tax fiddles, I'm all for it
In reply to Post #1061
If people are paying their taxes they are abiding by the laws of the country, job done. Now if you have a problem with rich people, you need to deal with it? When did I say I had a problem with rich people? Oh, I forgot you brain is damaged isn't it and doesn't work properly.
I have a problem with rich people using public money to feed themselves and home themselves when there are starving children and homeless people in the country. I'd say that's quite a reasonable thing to have a problem with. Let's put it in to context... average salary in Britain is 29k, MP salary is 79k. Yet the taxes of someone earning annually 2.5x less than an MP has to pay for an MPs food bill. Yet there are hungry children out there which MPs (who get your money to pay for their food) just decided aren't worthy of having public money to be fed.
Think you need to get seen to, plenty of good doctors out there, probably none good enough to put a stop to your embarrassing memory loss and very incorrectly assuming ramblings though.
If people are paying their taxes they are abiding by the laws of the country, job done. Now if you have a problem with rich people, you need to deal with it? When did I say I had a problem with rich people? Oh, I forgot you brain is damaged isn't it and doesn't work properly.
I have a problem with rich people using public money to feed themselves and home themselves when there are starving children and homeless people in the country. I'd say that's quite a reasonable thing to have a problem with. Let's put it in to context... average salary in Britain is 29k, MP salary is 79k. Yet the taxes of someone earning annually 2.5x less than an MP has to pay for an MPs food bill. Yet there are hungry children out there which MPs (who get your money to pay for their food) just decided aren't worthy of having public money to be fed.
Think you need to get seen to, plenty of good doctors out there, probably none good enough to put a stop to your embarrassing memory loss and very incorrectly assuming ramblings though.
In reply to Post #1062
You raise a valid point about MPs wages, maybe you should review those when you get in
Lets take a step back to Rashford shall we, and this is what pisses me off. Same with a lot of people the same, don't come banging a drum unless you are doing something about it yourself. He is a millionaire footballer, if he was so ****ing interested he would be paying a wad himself, hows that?
And like I said below, if he is, good on the lad, he is a man of his word, respect, and if he is not he's another ****ing hypocrite
You raise a valid point about MPs wages, maybe you should review those when you get in
Lets take a step back to Rashford shall we, and this is what pisses me off. Same with a lot of people the same, don't come banging a drum unless you are doing something about it yourself. He is a millionaire footballer, if he was so ****ing interested he would be paying a wad himself, hows that?
And like I said below, if he is, good on the lad, he is a man of his word, respect, and if he is not he's another ****ing hypocrite
In reply to Post #1063
He has done? Really should research before making your incorrect assumptions. He donated a large sum to fairshare and has supported them greatly. Considering £100,000 can provide 400,000 meals (according to fairshare) an MPs £25 a night food allowance could provide 100 meals a night for hungry children. See where I'm going with this? The same people that earn significant sums of money as a MINIMUM when you exclude external incomes, voted no to feeding hungry children (all 322 of them), could actually provide, if they put their £25 allowance a night to the cause for one night a week, 32,200 meals.
I mean if you don't think that's ****ed up...
He has done? Really should research before making your incorrect assumptions. He donated a large sum to fairshare and has supported them greatly. Considering £100,000 can provide 400,000 meals (according to fairshare) an MPs £25 a night food allowance could provide 100 meals a night for hungry children. See where I'm going with this? The same people that earn significant sums of money as a MINIMUM when you exclude external incomes, voted no to feeding hungry children (all 322 of them), could actually provide, if they put their £25 allowance a night to the cause for one night a week, 32,200 meals.
I mean if you don't think that's ****ed up...
In reply to Post #1064
Don't disagree with you on that. But that's all part of their package. I'm not defending them, I think they are a bunch of ****s but using your analogy, would you give up some of your salary?
And if he has, respect to the lad, he is a man of his words
Don't disagree with you on that. But that's all part of their package. I'm not defending them, I think they are a bunch of ****s but using your analogy, would you give up some of your salary?
And if he has, respect to the lad, he is a man of his words