In reply to Post #680
Win what?
Win what?
In reply to Post #677
Point 1 I just meant that if someone bombs the granny out your country you're more likely to go there to get a new life because you probably think they owe you it and you know they'll likely accept you and give you a fair bit. Revenge may be one reason but I meant it as “take away my life then you can give me a new one” type thing. Reparations if you want to call it that.
Points 2&3. That is a solution to an issue but I was just talking about some of the reasons they bypass other countries to come here. We have many EEs here earning money and looking for a better life, why would refugees settle in the countries they are leaving to come here?
Point 1 I just meant that if someone bombs the granny out your country you're more likely to go there to get a new life because you probably think they owe you it and you know they'll likely accept you and give you a fair bit. Revenge may be one reason but I meant it as “take away my life then you can give me a new one” type thing. Reparations if you want to call it that.
Points 2&3. That is a solution to an issue but I was just talking about some of the reasons they bypass other countries to come here. We have many EEs here earning money and looking for a better life, why would refugees settle in the countries they are leaving to come here?
Give em democracy , 
, i thought that had been debunked a 100 times over now , we are suffering the blowback of a failed economic strategy which was influenced heavily by the largest lobby group in the world , who can not be named , or you will be called racist !
Democracy , come on ,
, i thought that had been debunked a 100 times over now , we are suffering the blowback of a failed economic strategy which was influenced heavily by the largest lobby group in the world , who can not be named , or you will be called racist ! Democracy , come on ,
In reply to Post #653
but just for balance sake, asylum seeker does not equal terrorist
Does this not go back to what we have talked about already?
They want to come into this country or others for a better life. The problem is, a lot have no education or the relevant skills to make a contribution so as well as the lazy white folks (pardon the racist pun) there are then these. If they can't make a contribution then there is absolutely no point in being here, another group sat on their areas all day looking to blame society for their problems. Vulnerable people really, very easy to condition and manipulate
Saw the banners on the news again last night. Black lives matter we need jobs and houses
So does everybody else, get of your lazy arses and do something them ffs. It does not get offered on a plate
There opportunity's for all in good old England town. Think I might apply for Boris's job . You have two years to learn how to speak English, our language, so you can communicate, and get a job or you are going home, we have enough spongers draining our society already, I think two years is more than enough
Tell you what they should bring in. National service for all. If we were to go to war there would be a massive percentage rioting because they did not want to, against their believes or religion. Well, for me, you live in this country so you should be prepared to fight for it, simple really ain't it
but just for balance sake, asylum seeker does not equal terrorist
Does this not go back to what we have talked about already?
They want to come into this country or others for a better life. The problem is, a lot have no education or the relevant skills to make a contribution so as well as the lazy white folks (pardon the racist pun) there are then these. If they can't make a contribution then there is absolutely no point in being here, another group sat on their areas all day looking to blame society for their problems. Vulnerable people really, very easy to condition and manipulate
Saw the banners on the news again last night. Black lives matter we need jobs and houses
So does everybody else, get of your lazy arses and do something them ffs. It does not get offered on a plate
There opportunity's for all in good old England town. Think I might apply for Boris's job . You have two years to learn how to speak English, our language, so you can communicate, and get a job or you are going home, we have enough spongers draining our society already, I think two years is more than enough
Tell you what they should bring in. National service for all. If we were to go to war there would be a massive percentage rioting because they did not want to, against their believes or religion. Well, for me, you live in this country so you should be prepared to fight for it, simple really ain't it
In reply to Post #684
I think that statement “you live in this country so you should be prepared to fight for it” only really applies if the country is under threat or being invaded. Personally I feel sorry for the dead servicemen that have fought in the Middle East. They aren't protecting this country. It's ironic though isn't it that the same statement is used for those out troops are fighting against yet we are saying “how can they fight against us, we just want what we think is best for them”.... they are protecting their country from actual invasion. Not doing the invading.
I think that statement “you live in this country so you should be prepared to fight for it” only really applies if the country is under threat or being invaded. Personally I feel sorry for the dead servicemen that have fought in the Middle East. They aren't protecting this country. It's ironic though isn't it that the same statement is used for those out troops are fighting against yet we are saying “how can they fight against us, we just want what we think is best for them”.... they are protecting their country from actual invasion. Not doing the invading.
In reply to Post #684
No scozza. Not that simple at all.
Are you fighting because you believe in something or because your prime minister lied to you? It's never simple.
And someone seeking asylum is not the same as a lazy git who did feck all at school and just wants to watch daytime tv all day. A 'better life' is relative. Better than living in the rubble that used to be your family home with no water or electricity because the good old US / UK troops bombed the country you live in? Or because they preach about democracy and human rights while allowing millions of people to be displaced in their own country?
Asylum seekers are not terrorists. Take a look at the camps they find themselves in. Take a look at what they are fleeing from ffs. The huge majority of these people have had their lives obliterated. They didn't see good old England on TVs and think 'I know, I'll get the kids, leave everything I've ever owned and people I love, and set off walking to see if I can get a council house'.
It's a humanitarian disgrace and those countries that can help, SHOULD help. It's basic human kindness. Now that is simple.
No scozza. Not that simple at all.
Are you fighting because you believe in something or because your prime minister lied to you? It's never simple.
And someone seeking asylum is not the same as a lazy git who did feck all at school and just wants to watch daytime tv all day. A 'better life' is relative. Better than living in the rubble that used to be your family home with no water or electricity because the good old US / UK troops bombed the country you live in? Or because they preach about democracy and human rights while allowing millions of people to be displaced in their own country?
Asylum seekers are not terrorists. Take a look at the camps they find themselves in. Take a look at what they are fleeing from ffs. The huge majority of these people have had their lives obliterated. They didn't see good old England on TVs and think 'I know, I'll get the kids, leave everything I've ever owned and people I love, and set off walking to see if I can get a council house'.
It's a humanitarian disgrace and those countries that can help, SHOULD help. It's basic human kindness. Now that is simple.
In reply to Post #686
I get that to an extent Mal but I think you are a bit naïve if you want to give everyone the benefit of the doubt.
I get that to an extent Mal but I think you are a bit naïve if you want to give everyone the benefit of the doubt.
In reply to Post #687
better than assuming the very worst of everyone though eh?
Have a good day man
better than assuming the very worst of everyone though eh?
Have a good day man
In reply to Post #681
This might come as a shock to you but wars between democracies are very rare. You say Britain leaving democracy as a legacy is "nothing to be proud of". How many of those countries have ditched it under self rule? Like I've said best leave it to those that understand it.
This might come as a shock to you but wars between democracies are very rare. You say Britain leaving democracy as a legacy is "nothing to be proud of". How many of those countries have ditched it under self rule? Like I've said best leave it to those that understand it.
In reply to Post #687
'Benefit of the doubt'?
What doubt?
Might be an idea to view them as people who have gotten off their arses to an extent almost unimaginable to the British in order to make a better life for themselves and their families, and acknowledge their determination and courage rather than immediately view them with suspicion ... and doubt.
'Benefit of the doubt'?
What doubt?
Might be an idea to view them as people who have gotten off their arses to an extent almost unimaginable to the British in order to make a better life for themselves and their families, and acknowledge their determination and courage rather than immediately view them with suspicion ... and doubt.
In reply to Post #690
If I remember rightly approx. 50% of asylum seekers get entry of the UK the rest are judged not to be and so we shouldn't just let them in because they made the journey or in my words 'give them the benefit of doubt'
That's the point I'm trying to make
If I remember rightly approx. 50% of asylum seekers get entry of the UK the rest are judged not to be and so we shouldn't just let them in because they made the journey or in my words 'give them the benefit of doubt'
That's the point I'm trying to make
In reply to Post #691
Gotcha.
You're talking about real refugees rather than the swarthy looking ne'er-do-wells, but I thought you meant terrorists rather than real refugees
Gotcha.
You're talking about real refugees rather than the swarthy looking ne'er-do-wells, but I thought you meant terrorists rather than real refugees
In reply to Post #692
That's forums for ya! 
That's forums for ya!
In reply to Post #689
Still making no sense. What do we as Britain “win” as you put it? Still haven't won any war in the Middle East. Because troops are still there. The democracy that has been installed hasn't really worked how it should do.
What I said wasn't to be proud of is invading countries on unsound evidence which is then proven to be untrue by government instigated reports. I bet you think the empire was doing the people in those countries a favour too.
Still making no sense. What do we as Britain “win” as you put it? Still haven't won any war in the Middle East. Because troops are still there. The democracy that has been installed hasn't really worked how it should do.
What I said wasn't to be proud of is invading countries on unsound evidence which is then proven to be untrue by government instigated reports. I bet you think the empire was doing the people in those countries a favour too.
In reply to Post #689
Iraq as of 2018 was the 11th most politically unstable country in the world and Afghanistan is one of the most politically corrupt countries in the world. Democracy installed again...they've been democratic countries before until certain leaders stopped doing things democratically... but the democracy isn't really working is it.
Considering the “reasons” for being in those countries was to remove al-Qaeda (Afghanistan) post 9/11...why was democracy installed? Iraq was to remove Saddam because of WMD (which never existed)...why did democracy need “installing” when it already existed, it was just him that stopped it being used. Libya the same... government report found there was no evidence Gaddafi was planning anything he was accused of
China has much less democracy than these countries but we don't invade them... so if you think Britain is some world saviour spreading democracy you're sorely mistaken.
Iraq as of 2018 was the 11th most politically unstable country in the world and Afghanistan is one of the most politically corrupt countries in the world. Democracy installed again...they've been democratic countries before until certain leaders stopped doing things democratically... but the democracy isn't really working is it.
Considering the “reasons” for being in those countries was to remove al-Qaeda (Afghanistan) post 9/11...why was democracy installed? Iraq was to remove Saddam because of WMD (which never existed)...why did democracy need “installing” when it already existed, it was just him that stopped it being used. Libya the same... government report found there was no evidence Gaddafi was planning anything he was accused of
China has much less democracy than these countries but we don't invade them... so if you think Britain is some world saviour spreading democracy you're sorely mistaken.